Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

LoadComplete VS Loader.io

Compare LoadComplete VS Loader.io and see what are their differences

LoadComplete logo LoadComplete

The only load testing tool to record, replay, and test in real browsers at scale.

Loader.io logo Loader.io

Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service
  • LoadComplete Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-01
  • Loader.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-26

LoadComplete features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    LoadComplete offers an intuitive interface that allows users to easily set up and execute load tests without needing extensive technical knowledge.
  • Comprehensive Reporting
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics, making it easier for users to understand performance metrics and identify bottlenecks.
  • Integration Capabilities
    LoadComplete integrates well with various CI/CD tools, enhancing its utility in automated testing environments.
  • Real Browser Testing
    It enables testing using real browsers, ensuring that load tests closely simulate real user interactions and provide more accurate performance data.

Possible disadvantages of LoadComplete

  • Cost
    The pricing of LoadComplete can be high for small organizations or individuals, potentially limiting its accessibility for budget-conscious users.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running extensive tests may require significant computing resources, which could impact other operations if not managed properly.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its usability, some aspects of the tool might have a learning curve, especially for users unfamiliar with load testing concepts.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Compared to some other load testing tools, LoadComplete may support fewer protocols, which could be a limitation for testing complex systems.

Loader.io features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Loader.io offers a straightforward and intuitive user interface, making it easy for users to set up and run load tests without a steep learning curve.
  • Quick Test Setup
    With Loader.io, you can quickly set up load tests by simply verifying your website, inputting the target URL, and defining parameters such as duration and the number of clients.
  • Scalability
    Loader.io allows you to scale your tests from a few clients to hundreds of thousands, accommodating different testing needs.
  • Free Tier
    Loader.io offers a free tier that allows users to perform basic load testing, which is great for small projects or initial testing phases.
  • Integration
    Loader.io integrates well with other services and CI/CD pipelines, enabling automated performance testing as part of your development workflow.

Possible disadvantages of Loader.io

  • Limited Test Duration
    The free tier and some lower-tier plans have limitations on the duration of load tests, which might not be sufficient for testing long-running processes.
  • Complex Scenarios
    Loader.io may not support highly complex testing scenarios out-of-the-box, such as tests requiring advanced scripting or multi-step transactions.
  • Resource Limitations
    High concurrency and load levels may require higher-tier plans, which can become costly for larger-scale testing.
  • Geographic Limitations
    There may be limitations on the geographical distribution of clients, which could affect tests intended to simulate traffic from varied regions.
  • Reporting
    While Loader.io provides basic reporting, it may lack the depth and customization options offered by some other performance testing tools, such as detailed analytics and advanced visualization features.

LoadComplete videos

LoadComplete 101: Getting Started in LoadComplete | SmartBear Academy

More videos:

  • Review - Hello Yogurt Game Review 1080p Official LoadComplete
  • Review - Hello Yogurt Game Review 1080p Official LoadComplete

Loader.io videos

No Loader.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LoadComplete and Loader.io)
Monitoring Tools
35 35%
65% 65
Website Testing
40 40%
60% 60
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LoadComplete and Loader.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Loader.io seems to be a lot more popular than LoadComplete. While we know about 22 links to Loader.io, we've tracked only 1 mention of LoadComplete. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LoadComplete mentions (1)

  • Automated Performance Testing?
    Browser Testing: Hit pages with virtual users performing a flow e.g. Sign up, login. If you want a report of how many "real" users can use your app concurrently, then this testing would give the closest "real" world statistics. Cons - price and requires JS/TS scripting knowledge. Tools: BrowserStorm, Flood.IO, LoadNinja. Source: almost 4 years ago

Loader.io mentions (22)

  • express server failing after high number of requests in digital ocean droplet with high configuration
    I wanted to see how many requests can this server handle, so I have used loader.io and run10k requests for 15 seconds. But it seems 20% percent of request fail due to timeout, and the response time keep increasing. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Why everyone says PostgreSQL better then mongo?
    I ran on the same hardware 5k current get requests through https://loader.io/ tool to the server with each db. Source: about 2 years ago
  • free-for.dev
    Loader.io — Free load testing tools with limitations. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • How to stress test my website?
    We put 50 servers of puppets against 50 http servers and see who wins. Ever had 10,000 in your checkout line at once? loader.io is for posers. Also what if there's 250,000 wanting to join the checkout line. Well we can scale to the moon and not handle that. I recommend a waiting room like Queue It. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Best Way to Benchmark Web Hosting?
    I've used what you said, identical setups (with Wordpress) and some plugins: WordPress Hosting Benchmark tool and WP Performance Tester plus some runs with loader.io. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LoadComplete and Loader.io, you can also consider the following products

WebLOAD - WebLOAD - The most flexible and cost effective software for enterprise load, stress and performance testing, integrated with DevOps processes. Click for details

locust - An open source load testing tool written in Python.

LoadView - LoadView is a cloud-based load testing platform that allows users to stress-test their websites and web apps to know their performance level.

Apache JMeter - Apache JMeter™.

StresStimulus - Load testing tool for websites and mobile that works with hard-to-test applications.

k6 Cloud - Managed load testing service built on top of the popular open-source project k6.