LiteSpeed Web Server VS OpenResty

Compare LiteSpeed Web Server VS OpenResty and see what are their differences

LibHunt

LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

LiteSpeed Web Server

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

OpenResty

Turning Nginx into a Full-fledged Web App Server

Landing page //
2021-07-31

Landing page //
2023-03-16

LiteSpeed Web Server

Website: litespeedtech.com

Edit details

LiteSpeed Web Server features and specs

Performance
LiteSpeed is known for its high performance, handling more traffic with fewer resources compared to traditional web servers like Apache.
Built-in Caching
It comes with LSCache, which provides advanced server-side caching, significantly boosting loading times for web applications.
Security
LiteSpeed includes built-in anti-DDoS features, application-level distributed defense, and the ability to mitigate different kinds of attacks effectively.
Easy Apache Replacement
LiteSpeed is compatible with Apache's htaccess, mod_rewrite, and mod_security, making it easy to switch from Apache without changing configurations.
HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 Support
LiteSpeed supports modern protocols such as HTTP/2 and HTTP/3, making it suitable for the latest website requirements and performance enhancements.

Possible disadvantages of LiteSpeed Web Server

Cost
LiteSpeed is a commercial solution, and its licensing fees can be a disadvantage for smaller businesses or individual developers.
Proprietary Software
Being a proprietary solution, it doesn’t offer the transparency and community support advantages of open-source web servers like Apache and Nginx.
Learning Curve
Switching to LiteSpeed may involve a learning curve, especially for those accustomed to other web server technologies.
Limited Customization
It may not offer the same level of customization and flexibility as some other web servers, particularly in specialized or highly unique environments.

OpenResty features and specs

High Performance
Built on NGINX, OpenResty benefits from high-performance HTTP server capabilities, capable of handling a large number of simultaneous connections efficiently.
Extensibility
Integrates seamlessly with the LuaJIT scripting language, allowing for powerful customizations and extending the server's functionality without the need to modify core code.
Rich Ecosystem
Supports a wide range of third-party modules for various functionalities such as caching, security, request manipulation, and more, fostering a comprehensive and versatile ecosystem.
Asynchronous Processing
Capable of non-blocking processing, which is essential for real-time web applications, ensuring lower latency and higher throughput.
Active Community and Support
Backed by an active community and commercial support options, providing ample resources for troubleshooting, enhancing functionality, and keeping up with the latest best practices.

Possible disadvantages of OpenResty

Steep Learning Curve
Requires proficiency in Lua scripting and understanding of NGINX configuration, which might be challenging for those new to these technologies.
Complex Debugging
Debugging Lua code within OpenResty can be complex, lacking some of the more advanced debugging tools available for other languages.
Limited Documentation
While there is documentation available, it may not be as comprehensive or beginner-friendly compared to other more mature web server ecosystems.
Niche Use Case
Primarily suited for high-performance applications requiring custom HTTP server behavior, which might not be necessary for simpler web applications or APIs.
Resource Intensive
Depending on the complexity of the Lua scripts and modules used, OpenResty can become resource-intensive, requiring careful optimization and resource management.

LiteSpeed Web Server videos

+ Add

What Is LiteSpeed Web Server?

OpenResty videos

+ Add

Why and how I built my CMS based on ArangoDB & openresty

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LiteSpeed Web Server and OpenResty)

OpenResty

Web And Application Servers

62 62%

Web And Application Servers

38% 38

Web Servers

61 61%

Web Servers

39% 39

Application Server

58 58%

Application Server

42% 42

Development Tools

85 85%

Development Tools

15% 15

User comments

Share your experience with using LiteSpeed Web Server and OpenResty. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare LiteSpeed Web Server and OpenResty

LiteSpeed Web Server Reviews

Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown

LiteSpeed Web Server, abbreviated as LSWS, is almost a newcomer to the webserver ‘scene’. It has gained a huge, perhaps even cult-like following in the last few years among web hosting companies due to its efficiency. With its streamlined architecture, companies running LiteSpeed Web Server could (theoretically) double the maximum capacity of websites their servers, assuming...

Source: chemicloud.com

Top Linux Web Servers: Pros and Cons

LiteSpeed comes in two versions: a free one known as OpenLiteSpeed and a paid enterprise version with extended functionality.

Source: bigstep.com

Alternative web servers compared: Lighttpd, Nginx, LiteSpeed and Zeus

Brief info: LiteSpeed is a commercial web server designed specifically for large websites. One of LiteSpeed’s advantages is that it can read Apache configurations directly which makes it easy to integrate with existing products to replace Apache. The server is lightweight and as the name implies very fast.

Source: www.pingdom.com

OpenResty Reviews

We have no reviews of OpenResty yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OpenResty seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LiteSpeed Web Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LiteSpeed Web Server yet. Tracking of LiteSpeed Web Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

OpenResty mentions (21)

Scriptable Operating Systems with Lua [pdf]
It's maybe deprecated by the official Nginx support, but there are other projects and organizations that are offering Lua scripting with Nginx with all kinds of extensions and libraries. See OpenResty website[0] and Github repo[1]. [0] - https://openresty.org/en/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Ask HN: The C10M Problem
Have you seen https://openresty.org/en/ before? To share a quote directly taken from their website: > By taking advantage of various well-designed Nginx modules (most of which are developed by the OpenResty team themselves), OpenResty® effectively turns the nginx server into a powerful web app server, in which the web developers can use the Lua programming language to script various existing nginx C modules and... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
Show HN: Lockbox: forward proxy for making third party API calls
Nginx is quite extendable, there are tons of nginx plugins to help you add more customizations. There is OpenResty, a version of nginx [0]. It allows you to script all sorts of stuff with Lua inside nginx itself. Tools like lockbox are not necessary, nginx, caddy, etc or heck even a normal 70 line python3 fastapi based script works just fine and should be more extendable than lockbox. [0](https://openresty.org/en/). - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Five Apache projects you probably didn't know about
APISIX is an API Gateway. It builds upon OpenResty, a Lua layer built on top of the famous nginx reverse-proxy. APISIX adds abstractions to the mix, e.g., Route, Service, Upstream, and offers a plugin-based architecture. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
Apache APISIX plugin priority, a leaky abstraction?
Apache APISIX is an API Gateway, which builds upon the OpenResty reverse-proxy to offer a plugin-based architecture. The main benefit of such an architecture is that it brings structure to the configuration of routes. It's a help at scale, when managing hundreds or thousands of routes. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago