Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

LiteSpeed Web Server VS Ninja Build

Compare LiteSpeed Web Server VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

LiteSpeed Web Server logo LiteSpeed Web Server

LiteSpeed Web Server (LSWS) is a high-performance Apache drop-in replacement.

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
  • LiteSpeed Web Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-31
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14

LiteSpeed Web Server videos

+ Add

What Is LiteSpeed Web Server?

More videos:

  • Review - What Is LiteSpeed Web Server?

Ninja Build videos

+ Add

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LiteSpeed Web Server and Ninja Build)

LiteSpeed Web Server

Ninja Build

Web And Application Servers
100 100%
Web And Application Servers
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100
Web Servers
100 100%
Web Servers
0% 0
JavaScript Package Manager
0 0%
JavaScript Package Manager
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LiteSpeed Web Server and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare LiteSpeed Web Server and Ninja Build

LiteSpeed Web Server Reviews

Litespeed vs Nginx vs Apache: Web Server Showdown
LiteSpeed Web Server, abbreviated as LSWS, is almost a newcomer to the webserver ‘scene’. It has gained a huge, perhaps even cult-like following in the last few years among web hosting companies due to its efficiency. With its streamlined architecture, companies running LiteSpeed Web Server could (theoretically) double the maximum capacity of websites their servers, assuming...
Source: chemicloud.com
Top Linux Web Servers: Pros and Cons
LiteSpeed comes in two versions: a free one known as OpenLiteSpeed and a paid enterprise version with extended functionality.
Source: bigstep.com
Alternative web servers compared: Lighttpd, Nginx, LiteSpeed and Zeus
Brief info: LiteSpeed is a commercial web server designed specifically for large websites. One of LiteSpeed’s advantages is that it can read Apache configurations directly which makes it easy to integrate with existing products to replace Apache. The server is lightweight and as the name implies very fast.
Source: www.pingdom.com

Ninja Build Reviews

We have no reviews of Ninja Build yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LiteSpeed Web Server mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LiteSpeed Web Server yet. Tracking of LiteSpeed Web Server recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 11 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LiteSpeed Web Server and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Loading...