Software Alternatives & Reviews

LinuxKit VS Ottomatica slim

Compare LinuxKit VS Ottomatica slim and see what are their differences

LinuxKit logo LinuxKit

A toolkit for building secure, portable and lean operating systems for containers

Ottomatica slim logo Ottomatica slim

Build and run tiny vms from Dockerfiles. Small and sleek. - ottomatica/slim
  • LinuxKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23
  • Ottomatica slim Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-27

LinuxKit videos

How LinuxKit Made Tinkerbell More Magical with Justin Cormack and Dan Finneran

Ottomatica slim videos

No Ottomatica slim videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LinuxKit and Ottomatica slim)
DevOps Tools
60 60%
40% 40
Developer Tools
57 57%
43% 43
Linux
100 100%
0% 0
Containers As A Service
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LinuxKit and Ottomatica slim. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, LinuxKit should be more popular than Ottomatica slim. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LinuxKit mentions (8)

  • Gokrazy – Go Appliances
    Another project that aims to deliver this is Linuxkit (https://github.com/linuxkit/linuxkit). All the components they ship are written in memory safe languages (usually Go) and run as containers under containerd. You can build a custom image very easily, fully defined as a YAML file. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • An overview of single-purpose Linux distributions
    Docker-the-company maintained https://github.com/linuxkit/linuxkit. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Create a minimalist OS using Docker Containers and Hashicorp Packer
    LF-Edge EVE project leverages Linuxkit to create custom OSs for Edge Devices which in turn leverages Containers as Lego Blocks. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Unpopular opinion: I was promised lightweight containers but I got yet another VM
    Behind the scenes Docker Desktop for Mac spawns a linuxkit VM with a bit of extra stuff like NFS to enable mounting Mac paths into containers. In the Docker Desktop settings you'll find the current resource assignment for that VM. That is pretty much reserved for docker so that it does not have to compete with MacOS processes for available resources. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What happened to the nice Ansible cloud (provisioning) listing?
    That said... You might want to check out linuxkit. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Ottomatica slim mentions (1)

  • Execute Docker Containers as QEMU MicroVMs
    There are a few existing projects out there like this if folks are interested. Slim [0] is the one I can remember off the top of my head. I think there are a couple more. Still, neat to have the walkthrough here in this post. https://github.com/ottomatica/slim. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LinuxKit and Ottomatica slim, you can also consider the following products

Docker Swarm - Native clustering for Docker. Turn a pool of Docker hosts into a single, virtual host.

Docker Compose - Define and run multi-container applications with Docker

RancherOS - A simplified Linux distribution built from containers, for containers. Everything in RancherOS is managed by Docker, with minimum software needed to run Docker.

Moby - A new upstream project to break up Docker into independent components

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service

Kitematic - The easiest way to start using Docker on your Mac