Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Links VS GitHub Pages

Compare Links VS GitHub Pages and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Links logo Links

Links is a graphics and text mode web browser, released under GPL. Links is free software.

GitHub Pages logo GitHub Pages

A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub
  • Links Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05
  • GitHub Pages Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-19

Links features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Links is designed to be a lightweight web browser, making it ideal for systems with limited resources or older hardware, providing fast browsing experience without consuming excessive system resources.
  • Text-Based Mode
    Links offers a text-based mode, which can render pages in text format without graphics, useful for users needing fast, non-graphical web access or on terminals without graphical capabilities.
  • Low Bandwidth Usage
    By focusing on text content and fewer multimedia elements, Links is efficient in terms of bandwidth usage, beneficial for users with limited or metered internet connections.
  • Security
    Due to its minimalist design and fewer dependencies, Links potentially has a smaller attack surface compared to more feature-rich browsers, potentially providing enhanced security.
  • Cross-Platform
    Links is available on multiple platforms, including Linux, Windows, and Unix-like systems, providing flexibility to users across different operating systems.

Possible disadvantages of Links

  • Limited Multimedia Support
    Links lacks extensive support for modern multimedia features and dynamic content, which can lead to compatibility issues with websites that rely heavily on JavaScript or multimedia elements.
  • Basic User Interface
    The user interface of Links is quite rudimentary compared to modern browsers, which may not appeal to users accustomed to more polished and feature-rich graphic interfaces.
  • Learning Curve
    For users new to text-based or minimalist browsers, there might be a learning curve involved in understanding how to navigate and utilize Links effectively.
  • Limited Extensions and Plugins
    Links does not support a wide range of extensions and plugins that modern browsers offer, leading to less customization and additional functionalities for users.
  • Site Compatibility
    Due to its focus on simplicity, Links may not render some modern web pages accurately, which can lead to a subpar experience on many contemporary websites.

GitHub Pages features and specs

  • Free Hosting
    GitHub Pages provides free hosting for static websites, making it an economical choice given no cost is involved.
  • Easy Integration with GitHub
    Direct integration with GitHub repositories allows for seamless deployment directly from a repository’s branches.
  • Custom Domains
    Users can use their own custom domains, providing greater control over their site's branding and URL structure.
  • Jekyll Integration
    Built-in support for Jekyll, a popular static site generator, allows for easy creation and management of content.
  • Version Control
    Since your website's source code is hosted on GitHub, you can use Git version control to manage changes and collaborate with others.
  • SSL for Custom Domains
    Free SSL certificates provided for custom domains enhance security and improve SEO performance for your website.
  • GitHub Actions
    Integration with GitHub Actions allows for advanced CI/CD workflows, automating the process of testing and deploying updates.
  • Community and Documentation
    Extensive documentation and a large community make it easier to troubleshoot issues and find examples or guides.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Pages

  • Static Site Limitations
    GitHub Pages only supports the hosting of static content, which means no support for server-side scripting or dynamic content.
  • Resource Limitations
    Imposed restrictions on bandwidth and storage may not be suitable for high-traffic or large-scale websites.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration, especially when dealing with custom domains or SSL, can be complex for beginners.
  • Limited Customization Options
    While Jekyll is powerful, there are still limitations in terms of plugins and customization compared to more robust CMS solutions.
  • No Backend Support
    Inability to run backend processes or databases means that dynamic applications requiring real-time data and complex backend logic cannot be hosted.
  • Corporate Restrictions
    Enterprises or organizations with strict security or compliance policies may find GitHub Pages insufficient for their needs.
  • Dependent on GitHub
    Reliance on GitHub's platform means that any downtime or outages on GitHub can directly affect the availability of your website.

Analysis of GitHub Pages

Overall verdict

  • Yes, GitHub Pages is a good option for hosting static websites, especially for those who are already familiar with GitHub. It provides a straightforward, reliable, and cost-effective solution for many small to medium-sized projects.

Why this product is good

  • GitHub Pages is a popular choice for hosting static websites because it's directly integrated with GitHub, making deployment seamless and efficient. It supports custom domain configurations, offers free hosting, and automatically integrates with GitHub's version control system. These features make it particularly appealing for developers looking for a simple and effective way to host project sites or personal blogs.

Recommended for

  • Developers and tech-savvy users who are comfortable with Git and GitHub.
  • Individuals or organizations looking to host static sites, such as blogs or project documentation.
  • Users interested in a free hosting solution with easy Version Control System (VCS) integration.
  • Open-source project maintainers who want to provide project documentation or demos.

Links videos

Heavy Links REVIEW!!!

More videos:

  • Review - LINKS HAIR REVIEW:WATCH ME SLAY THIS INSTALL FT LINKS HAIR

GitHub Pages videos

Intro to GitHub Pages

More videos:

  • Review - What is GitHub Pages?
  • Tutorial - How to Setup GitHub Pages (2020) | Data Science Portfolio

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Links and GitHub Pages)
Web Browsers
100 100%
0% 0
Static Site Generators
0 0%
100% 100
Rental Property Management
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Links and GitHub Pages. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Links and GitHub Pages

Links Reviews

We have no reviews of Links yet.
Be the first one to post

GitHub Pages Reviews

Exploring alternatives to Vercel: A guide for web developers
GitHub Pages is a free hosting service provided by GitHub, primarily intended for hosting static sites directly from a GitHub repository. While it lacks some of the advanced features found in other platforms, its simplicity and integration with GitHub make it an attractive option for certain types of projects.
Source: fleek.xyz
Top 10 Netlify Alternatives
Static Site Generators — It is a good way for developers to build sites on GitHub pages with the help of site generators. Yes, it has the ability to publish and release any static file. But it is recommended to proceed with Jekyll.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Pages seems to be a lot more popular than Links. While we know about 495 links to GitHub Pages, we've tracked only 20 mentions of Links. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Links mentions (20)

  • Lynx is the oldest web browser still being maintained
    I use http://links.twibright.com for surfing the local folders and lynx to retrieve pages. A little bit of sanity in this crazy world. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Stupid Problems Require Stupid Solutions (Cloudflare Is Breaking My SVGs)
    Every dash they remove is a byte (at least!) saved. This increases shareholder value. Your side note is solved by using the Links Browser[0]. I don't see the need to present a professional page when you're calling out one of the top 10 single points of global internet failure.[1] [0]http://links.twibright.com/ [1]Cloudflare routes 43% of the top 10,000 sites globally. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Show HN: Dillo 3.1.0 released after 9 years
    Links+ it's still posting releases, it's 2.29 right now. http://links.twibright.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • MicroWeb 2.0 – DOS web browser for Intel 8088
    I'm assuming author is aware of (E)Links? http://links.twibright.com At least Links seems to have a DOS version. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Show HN: Frogmouth – A Markdown browser for your terminal
    Http://links.twibright.com is the website, but the easiest way to try it is probably to search your preferred package manager. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

GitHub Pages mentions (495)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Links and GitHub Pages, you can also consider the following products

W3M - w3m is a text-based web browser as well as a pager like ' ...

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Lynx.invisible-island.net - Thomas Dickey is the maintainer/developer of the Lynx text-browser. This page gives some background and pointers to Lynx resources.

Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

Browsh - A fully-modern text-based browser, rendering to TTY and browsers

surge.sh - Static website hosting for front-end developers.