Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

lighttpd VS Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager

Compare lighttpd VS Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

lighttpd logo lighttpd

A secure, fast, compliant, and very flexible web-server that has been optimized for high-performance environments

Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager logo Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager

Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager is a great solution that enables you to route incoming traffic for high availability and performance.
  • lighttpd Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-28
  • Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-15

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to lighttpd and Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager)

lighttpd

Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager

Web And Application Servers
100 100%
Web And Application Servers
0% 0
Web Servers
79 79%
Web Servers
21% 21
Network & Admin
0 0%
Network & Admin
100% 100
Application Server
100 100%
Application Server
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using lighttpd and Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare lighttpd and Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager

lighttpd Reviews

13 Best XAMPP Alternatives
Lighttpd is a simple and lightweight web server that allows you to do very fast static file serving. It can also be used as a content cache, a reverse proxy, or an HTTP accelerator. Lighttpd is not only lightning-fast but also straightforward to set up; in many cases, you only need one configuration file to work. Lighttpd has been around for some time now, so there are...
Source: thetechtian.com
Top 5 open source web servers
Great article Robin. Most of my experience is with Apache. I first started using it on Windows about 1998 or 1999. When I got into using Linux in 2001 I switched my previous install to that OS and have since deployed it many times. I have tried NGINX and lighttpd but never in production.
Source: opensource.com
Alternative web servers compared: Lighttpd, Nginx, LiteSpeed and Zeus
The huge leap for Lighttpd in January-March of 2007 is most likely due to one or more web hosting or domain registration companies switching over to Lighttpd either for their regular pages, or for parked pages, or both. If anyone knows what happened there in more detail, please feel free to let us know in the comments.
Source: www.pingdom.com

Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager Reviews

We have no reviews of Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager yet.
Be the first one to post

What are some alternatives?

When comparing lighttpd and Microsoft Azure Traffic Manager, you can also consider the following products

Apache HTTP Server - Apache httpd has been the most popular web server on the Internet since April 1996

Kemp LoadMaster - L4/7 Load Balancer w SSL offload

Microsoft IIS - Internet Information Services is a web server for Microsoft Windows

Avi Vantage Load Balancer - Avi Vantage is a suite of multi-cloud application services that, among others, consist of a Software Load balancer to help provide you with a scalable, quick, and secure application experience.

Apache Tomcat - An open source software implementation of the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages technologies

AWS Elastic Load Balancing - Amazon ELB automatically distributes incoming application traffic across multiple Amazon EC2 instances in the cloud.

Loading...