Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Lightspark VS Sothink SWF Decompiler

Compare Lightspark VS Sothink SWF Decompiler and see what are their differences

Lightspark logo Lightspark

The Lightspark project

Sothink SWF Decompiler logo Sothink SWF Decompiler

Sothink SWF Decompiler, a professional Flash decompiler easily decompiles one or more SWF to FLA.
  • Lightspark Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-02
  • Sothink SWF Decompiler Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-31

Lightspark features and specs

  • Open Source
    Lightspark is an open-source project which means its source code is freely available, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to its development.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    It is designed to work across multiple platforms, including Linux and Windows, providing flexibility and accessibility for various users.
  • Active Development
    The project is actively maintained, ensuring that it receives regular updates and bug fixes, which contribute to improving performance and stability.

Possible disadvantages of Lightspark

  • Limited Flash Support
    Lightspark focuses on supporting newer versions of Flash, which may not cover all the features of legacy Flash content, potentially limiting its effectiveness in certain situations.
  • Performance Issues
    Users may experience performance issues, such as slower playback and higher resource consumption, depending on their system configuration and the complexity of the Flash content.
  • Compatibility Gaps
    There may be compatibility gaps with some Flash content, as not all features and use cases are fully supported, leading to inconsistent user experiences.

Sothink SWF Decompiler features and specs

  • Comprehensive SWF Decompilation
    Sothink SWF Decompiler provides users with the ability to decompile SWF files into FLA or FLEX formats, making it easy to edit and recover Flash projects.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The software is designed with a user-friendly interface that simplifies navigation and operation, catering to both novice and advanced users.
  • Multi-Format Export
    It allows exporting of Flash resources such as shapes, sounds, images, and ActionScript to various formats, facilitating flexibility in usage.
  • Preview and Playback
    The integrated player and preview capabilities enable users to view Flash videos and animations before proceeding with decompilation.
  • ActionScript Support
    The software supports ActionScript 2.0 and 3.0, allowing for the extraction and decompilation of complex Flash applications.

Possible disadvantages of Sothink SWF Decompiler

  • Limited OS Compatibility
    Sothink SWF Decompiler is primarily available for Windows, limiting its accessibility for users on other operating systems such as macOS or Linux.
  • Outdated Technology
    With the decline of Flash and the discontinuation of Flash Player support as of 2021, the relevance and usage of SWF Decompiler have become limited.
  • Possible Legal Concerns
    Decompiling SWF files may lead to intellectual property issues, as it involves reverse-engineering someone's work, which can be legally questionable.
  • Cost Consideration
    While offering a free trial, the full version of Sothink SWF Decompiler requires a purchase, which might be a downside for users seeking free software.
  • Performance Limitations
    Some users report performance issues, such as slow decompilation processes, especially when dealing with large or complex SWF files.

Lightspark videos

No Lightspark videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Sothink SWF Decompiler videos

Sothink SWF Decompiler Review (+ 2 giveaway licenses will be available soon!!)

More videos:

  • Review - A Handy Program Called Sothink SWF Decompiler
  • Review - Sothink SWF Decompiler 7 - LeecherMods Reviewed.mp4

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Lightspark and Sothink SWF Decompiler)
Online Services
57 57%
43% 43
Product Presentation
59 59%
41% 41
Game Engine
100 100%
0% 0
Tool
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Lightspark and Sothink SWF Decompiler. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Lightspark seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Lightspark mentions (9)

  • When SVG almost got network support for raw sockets
    Not the first attempted Flash reimplementation[1,2,3]. The GNU one didn’t work all that well back in the day as far as I remember, but then Flash was a moving target at the time. [1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/ [2]: http://lightspark.github.io/ [3]: https://github.com/mozilla/shumway. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Good flash emulator for walfas?
    A true emulator would be something like Ruffle or Lightspark. Ruffle I know doesn't work well with Walfas last time I checked. I don't know about Lightspark. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Flash game to Html5 converter
    Lightspark, a browser plugin written in C++. It's a work in progress, not every flash content will work. Modern mainstream browsers don't support running it within a page, so flash content needs to be run in a standalone lightspark app, or in some lesser known browsers. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How and where do I tell CMake where my C/CXX compiler is?
    I'm trying to install lightspark on my computer, and it hinges on launching a shell script that mainly executes a CMake command. When I try ./build.sh (the name of the shell script), I get a bunch of lines of errors. The first one I think is major is CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-3.23/Modules/CMakeTestCCompiler.cmake:69 (message): The C compiler "/usr/bin/cc" is not able to compile a simple test... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • What "legacy" software are you still forced to use in 2022 that you wish would die?
    I'm having alot of fun with this post actually. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some alternative or workaround for whatever you guys need to run. For example, instead of the clunky Java, we have this. Instead of Flash, try this. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Sothink SWF Decompiler mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Sothink SWF Decompiler yet. Tracking of Sothink SWF Decompiler recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Lightspark and Sothink SWF Decompiler, you can also consider the following products

Ruffle - An open source Flash player

Flash Decompiler Trillix - SWF Decompiler Trillix allows you to decompile SWF (Flash), convert SWF to FLA, extract SWF elements and edit SWF file. Supports AS 3.0, Flash CS6 & CC and Flex.

BlueMaxima's Flashpoint - the webgame preservation project.

JPEXS Free Flash Decompiler - JPEXS Free Flash Decompiler (FFDec) is an opensource Shockwave Flash (SWF) decompiler.

Flash Player 2021 - Want to fix "This plugin is not supported" and "Adobe Flash Player is blocked" error messages? This extension will remove those messages and allow you to play Flash in any website with a single click.

SWFTOOLS - SWFTools is a collection of utilities for working with Adobe Flash files (SWF files).