Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Lightspark VS Laravel

Compare Lightspark VS Laravel and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Lightspark logo Lightspark

The Lightspark project

Laravel logo Laravel

A PHP Framework For Web Artisans
  • Lightspark Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-02
  • Laravel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24

Lightspark features and specs

  • Open Source
    Lightspark is an open-source project which means its source code is freely available, allowing developers to inspect, modify, and contribute to its development.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    It is designed to work across multiple platforms, including Linux and Windows, providing flexibility and accessibility for various users.
  • Active Development
    The project is actively maintained, ensuring that it receives regular updates and bug fixes, which contribute to improving performance and stability.

Possible disadvantages of Lightspark

  • Limited Flash Support
    Lightspark focuses on supporting newer versions of Flash, which may not cover all the features of legacy Flash content, potentially limiting its effectiveness in certain situations.
  • Performance Issues
    Users may experience performance issues, such as slower playback and higher resource consumption, depending on their system configuration and the complexity of the Flash content.
  • Compatibility Gaps
    There may be compatibility gaps with some Flash content, as not all features and use cases are fully supported, leading to inconsistent user experiences.

Laravel features and specs

  • Eloquent ORM
    Laravel includes Eloquent ORM, which provides a beautiful and simple ActiveRecord implementation for working with your database. It allows for easy interaction with your databases, offering an intuitive syntax.
  • Blade Templating Engine
    The Blade templating engine offers a clean and efficient syntax for writing templates. It provides features like template inheritance and sections, which makes template design more manageable and organized.
  • Artisan CLI
    Laravel's Artisan Command Line Interface (CLI) allows developers to perform repetitive tasks and manage their Laravel project more efficiently with built-in commands for database migration, seeding, and building tasks.
  • Strong Community and Ecosystem
    Laravel has a large and active community that provides an abundance of resources, including packages, tutorials, and screencasts on Laracasts. This ecosystem allows for quick problem-solving and an extensive library of reusable components.
  • Robust Security Features
    Laravel provides built-in security features such as salted and hashed passwords, encryption, and protection against common vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site request forgery (CSRF).
  • Efficient Testing
    Laravel comes with PHPUnit integrated, along with convenient helper methods, making writing test cases and performing automated testing more straightforward. This leads to better code reliability and fewer bugs.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    Laravel has thorough and well-organized documentation that covers all its features in detail. This makes it easier for new and experienced developers to understand and use the framework effectively.

Possible disadvantages of Laravel

  • Performance Overhead
    Since Laravel is a full-featured framework, it includes many built-in functions and layers that can create performance overhead. For very high-performance applications, fine-tuning may be necessary.
  • Steep Learning Curve for Beginners
    For those new to web development or coming from a different programming paradigm, Laravel can be challenging to grasp initially due to its extensive features and modern PHP practices.
  • Heavy Dependency on Composer
    Laravel heavily relies on Composer for dependency management. While this is beneficial for package management, it can be a downside if you are not familiar with Composer or have issues managing packages.
  • Frequent Updates
    Laravel receives frequent updates and changes in the new versions, which can sometimes lead to compatibility issues with existing projects. Keeping up with the updates can be time-consuming.
  • Hosting Requirements
    Laravel requires specific server configurations and dependencies, which may not be available on all shared hosting services. This can necessitate using a Virtual Private Server (VPS) or dedicated server, which might have higher costs.

Analysis of Laravel

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Laravel is considered a good framework for web development.

Why this product is good

  • ["features", "Laravel includes a wide variety of built-in features such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching, which accelerate the development process."]
  • ["community", "It has a large and active community which contributes to a rich ecosystem of packages and resources."]
  • ["ease_of_use", "Laravel emphasizes simplicity and elegance, making it relatively easy to use, especially for developers familiar with PHP."]
  • ["documentation", "It provides comprehensive and well-structured documentation, which is very helpful for beginners and experienced developers alike."]
  • ["modern_tooling", "Laravel offers modern tooling with features like a robust CLI, built-in task scheduling, and an expressive ORM called Eloquent."]

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to build scalable web applications with PHP.
  • Teams seeking a framework with a strong balance between power and ease of use.
  • Projects that benefit from built-in solutions for common web application requirements like authentication and API support.
  • Developers interested in a framework with out-of-the-box features and an expressive syntax.

Lightspark videos

No Lightspark videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Laravel videos

+ Add

Laravel in 100 seconds

More videos:

  • Review - Why Laravel is Still Best in 2018

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Lightspark and Laravel)

Lightspark

Laravel

Online Services
100 100%
Online Services
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Product Presentation
100 100%
Product Presentation
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Lightspark and Laravel. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Lightspark and Laravel

Lightspark Reviews

We have no reviews of Lightspark yet.
Be the first one to post

Laravel Reviews

Laravel vs. Symfony: A Comprehensive Comparison of PHP Frameworks
Laravel has a vibrant ecosystem with many first-party packages, such as Laravel Horizon for queue management, Laravel Echo for real-time events, and Laravel Sanctum for API authentication, that make it easy to extend functionality without much hassle.
Source: blog.radwebhosting.com
The 20 Best Laravel Alternatives for Web Development
Oh, you bet. When devs talk Symfony, they’re eyeing robustness and a modular vibe that Laravel fans might miss. Its reusable components could tempt even the most loyal Laravel artisans to at least take a peek.
Source: tms-outsource.com
Top 9 best Frameworks for web development
The best frameworks for web development include React, Angular, Vue.js, Django, Spring, Laravel, Ruby on Rails, Flask and Express.js. Each of these frameworks has its own advantages and distinctive features, so it is important to choose the framework that best suits the needs of your project.
Source: www.kiwop.com
Top 5 Laravel Alternatives
However, there are other excellent choices other than Laravel as well. So, let’s check out some excellent Laravel alternatives before you hire Laravel developers India for your web development project. This post provides you with a thorough understanding of the available web development framework choices and their benefits over Laravel. For that, let’s first discuss the...
Source: www.etatvasoft.com
Framework review: Laravel vs CodeIgniter
Let's start with CodeIgniter first. It focuses on performance and speed. It offers a simple, easy-to-learn syntax, making it ideal for beginners. CodeIgniter uses its own proprietary Active Record implementation for database operations, which provides a simple and intuitive way to interact with data. Unlike Laravel, CodeIgniter does not enforce a specific architectural...
Source: infinyhost.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Laravel seems to be a lot more popular than Lightspark. While we know about 240 links to Laravel, we've tracked only 9 mentions of Lightspark. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Lightspark mentions (9)

  • When SVG almost got network support for raw sockets
    Not the first attempted Flash reimplementation[1,2,3]. The GNU one didn’t work all that well back in the day as far as I remember, but then Flash was a moving target at the time. [1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/ [2]: http://lightspark.github.io/ [3]: https://github.com/mozilla/shumway. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Good flash emulator for walfas?
    A true emulator would be something like Ruffle or Lightspark. Ruffle I know doesn't work well with Walfas last time I checked. I don't know about Lightspark. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Flash game to Html5 converter
    Lightspark, a browser plugin written in C++. It's a work in progress, not every flash content will work. Modern mainstream browsers don't support running it within a page, so flash content needs to be run in a standalone lightspark app, or in some lesser known browsers. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • How and where do I tell CMake where my C/CXX compiler is?
    I'm trying to install lightspark on my computer, and it hinges on launching a shell script that mainly executes a CMake command. When I try ./build.sh (the name of the shell script), I get a bunch of lines of errors. The first one I think is major is CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-3.23/Modules/CMakeTestCCompiler.cmake:69 (message): The C compiler "/usr/bin/cc" is not able to compile a simple test... Source: almost 3 years ago
  • What "legacy" software are you still forced to use in 2022 that you wish would die?
    I'm having alot of fun with this post actually. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some alternative or workaround for whatever you guys need to run. For example, instead of the clunky Java, we have this. Instead of Flash, try this. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

Laravel mentions (240)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Lightspark and Laravel, you can also consider the following products

Ruffle - An open source Flash player

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

BlueMaxima's Flashpoint - the webgame preservation project.

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Flash Player 2021 - Want to fix "This plugin is not supported" and "Adobe Flash Player is blocked" error messages? This extension will remove those messages and allow you to play Flash in any website with a single click.

CodeIgniter - A Fully Baked PHP Framework

Loading...