Software Alternatives & Reviews

lgtm.com VS Splint

Compare lgtm.com VS Splint and see what are their differences

lgtm.com logo lgtm.com

lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.

Splint logo Splint

Splint Home Page
  • lgtm.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-14
  • Splint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-01-23

lgtm.com videos

No lgtm.com videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Splint videos

Will a Night Splint Help Your Plantar Fasciitis? We Review 3 Braces.

More videos:

  • Review - Will A Night Splint Help Your Plantar Fasciitis?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to lgtm.com and Splint)
Code Analysis
61 61%
39% 39
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
51 51%
49% 49
Code Review
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using lgtm.com and Splint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Splint should be more popular than lgtm.com. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

lgtm.com mentions (3)

Splint mentions (9)

  • C-rusted: The Advantages of Rust, in C, without the Disadvantages
    Whenever I see people talk about the portability or compatibility advantages of C, I'm reminded of how "even C isn't compatible with C", because you typically aren't talking about up-to-date GCC or LLVM on these niche platforms... you're talking about some weird or archaic vendor-provided compiler... Possibly with syntax extensions that static analyzers like splint will choke on. (Splint can't even understand near... Source: about 1 year ago
  • Announcing Rust 1.67.1
    Huh. I think I actually needed to use the equivalent position for certain splint annotations in my C retro-hobby project. Source: about 1 year ago
  • US NGO Consumer Reports also reporting on C and C++ safety for product development.
    I often like to say that Rust's bindings are a way to trick people into writing the compile-time safety annotations that they didn't want to write for things like splint. (Seriously. Look into how much splint is capable of checking with the correct annotations.). Source: over 1 year ago
  • “Rust is safe” is not some kind of absolute guarantee of code safety
    Linters like Splint [0] can do that for C. I’m not saying that Rust’s built-in approach isn’t better, but please be careful about what exactly you claim. [0] http://splint.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Glauber's Journey from rust to typescript
    (Sort of like how, for my DOS hobby project, I use splint to require explicit casts between typedefs so I can use the newtype pattern without having to manually reach into wrapper struct fields in places that don't do conversions.). Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing lgtm.com and Splint, you can also consider the following products

Cppcheck - Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...

Parasoft C/C++test - Ensure compliance with a variety of functional safety, security, and coding standards in embedded C/C++ software.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

LDRA Testbed - Liverpool Data Research Associates (LDRA) is a provider of software analysis, test and requirements...