Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

lf (file manager) VS joshuto

Compare lf (file manager) VS joshuto and see what are their differences

lf (file manager) logo lf (file manager)

Terminal file manager written in Go (programming language).

joshuto logo joshuto

Ranger-like file manager for the terminal made with Rust.
  • lf (file manager) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04
  • joshuto Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-01

lf (file manager) features and specs

  • Speed
    Being a terminal-based file manager, lf is fast and snappy, providing swift navigation and file manipulation compared to GUI-based file managers.
  • Minimalistic Design
    With its simple and minimal interface, lf is less distracting and allows users to focus more on managing files effectively without unnecessary bells and whistles.
  • Keyboard-driven
    Offers efficient, keyboard-driven navigation and file management, increasing productivity for users comfortable with mouse-less interaction.
  • Configurable
    Highly configurable with the ability to customize key bindings, appearance, and integrate with external tools, making it adaptable to various workflows.
  • Cross-platform
    Available on multiple operating systems, including Unix-like systems and Windows, providing a consistent experience across different environments.
  • Vi-like Key Bindings
    Supports vi-like key bindings by default, which can be appealing to users familiar with the vi or vim editors who can extend their keyboard proficiency to file management.

Possible disadvantages of lf (file manager)

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The reliance on keyboard input and lack of graphical user interface elements can be difficult for users unfamiliar with terminal-based applications.
  • Limited Functionality
    May lack out-of-the-box features found in some GUI file managers, such as drag-and-drop support, thumbnail previews, and built-in synchronization capabilities.
  • Dependency on Terminal
    Since lf runs within a terminal, users must be comfortable navigating and operating within a terminal environment, which might not be ideal for everyone.
  • No Built-in Viewer
    Lf doesn't offer a built-in file viewer, requiring users to configure and rely on external programs to open or preview files, adding an extra configuration step.
  • Customization Required
    While lf is highly configurable, it requires users to spend time and effort in setting up custom configurations to tailor it to their specific needs.

joshuto features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to lf (file manager) and joshuto)
FTP Client
84 84%
16% 16
File Manager
80 80%
20% 20
Robo-Advisor
86 86%
14% 14
File Explorer
68 68%
32% 32

User comments

Share your experience with using lf (file manager) and joshuto. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, lf (file manager) seems to be a lot more popular than joshuto. While we know about 65 links to lf (file manager), we've tracked only 3 mentions of joshuto. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

lf (file manager) mentions (65)

View more

joshuto mentions (3)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing lf (file manager) and joshuto, you can also consider the following products

nnn - Fast and resource-sensitive file manager for the terminal

CliFM - CliFM is a completely CLI-based, shell-like and KISS file manager written in C: simple, fast, and lightweight as hell.

Broot - Commandline app to simplify directory navigation.

Bat - A cat(1) clone with wings.

xplr - Fast and hackable file manager for the terminal.

fd - A simple, fast and user-friendly alternative to 'find'.