Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Lazarus VS Ruby

Compare Lazarus VS Ruby and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Lazarus logo Lazarus

Lazarus is a cross-platform IDE for the Free Pascal compiler.

Ruby logo Ruby

A dynamic, interpreted, open source programming language with a focus on simplicity and productivity
  • Lazarus Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-17
  • Ruby Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-30

We recommend LibHunt Ruby for discovery and comparisons of trending Ruby projects.

Lazarus features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Development
    Lazarus IDE supports development for multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux, allowing developers to create applications that are portable across different operating systems.
  • Open Source
    Lazarus is open-source software, which means it is free to use, distribute, and modify, providing flexibility and cost savings for developers.
  • Rich Component Library
    The environment includes the Free Pascal Component Library (FCL) and Lazarus Component Library (LCL), offering a wide range of pre-built components to speed up application development.
  • Compatibility with Delphi
    Lazarus aims to be compatible with Delphi, allowing developers familiar with Delphi IDE to transition more easily and utilize existing Delphi codebases.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source, Lazarus has a supportive community that provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums to assist developers.

Possible disadvantages of Lazarus

  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users, especially those with no background in Pascal programming, may find Lazarus challenging to learn and start using effectively.
  • Less Modern UI Components
    Compared to other modern IDEs, Lazarus may lack some of the cutting-edge UI components or design tools that newer environments offer.
  • Limited Third-Party Libraries
    The ecosystem for third-party libraries and components may not be as extensive as other platforms like .NET or Java, which could limit functionality for certain projects.
  • Smaller Developer Community
    While there is support available, the community is smaller compared to other IDEs, which might impact the speed of getting help or updates.
  • Potential Delphi Compatibility Issues
    Despite efforts to maintain compatibility, some differences between Delphi and Lazarus can result in compatibility issues, requiring adjustments when migrating projects.

Ruby features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Ruby is designed with a focus on simplicity and productivity. Its syntax is easy to read and write, which makes it accessible for beginners as well as enjoyable for seasoned developers.
  • Rich Libraries
    Ruby boasts a large ecosystem of libraries and frameworks, such as Ruby on Rails, which speed up the development process and provide robust solutions for common tasks.
  • Community Support
    Ruby has a vibrant and active community, which means lots of resources, gems (libraries), and forums are available for learning and problem-solving.
  • Dynamic Typing
    Ruby's dynamic typing allows for more flexible and rapid development, as it doesn't require variable type declarations and allows for more expressive code.
  • Meta-Programming
    Ruby has powerful meta-programming capabilities that allow developers to write more abstract and flexible code, reducing repetition and improving code maintainability.

Possible disadvantages of Ruby

  • Performance
    Ruby is generally slower compared to languages like C, Java, and Go. This can be a significant drawback for applications where performance is critically important.
  • Concurrency
    While Ruby has some support for concurrency, it is not as robust as in other languages like Java or Erlang. This can be a limitation for highly concurrent applications.
  • Memory Usage
    Ruby applications tend to consume more memory compared to those written in other languages, which can be a drawback for large-scale applications or resource-constrained environments.
  • Not Suitable for All Types of Applications
    While Ruby excels in web development, particularly with Ruby on Rails, it may not be the best choice for system-level programming, real-time systems, or applications requiring fine-grained control over hardware.
  • Dependency on Gems
    While the rich ecosystem of gems is a strength, it can also be a downside. Over-reliance on third-party libraries can lead to dependencies on potentially unmaintained or poorly supported gems.

Lazarus videos

+ Add

Lazarus The First Collection Hardcover Review.

More videos:

  • Review - Lazarus at NYTW Review
  • Review - Lazarus DELUXE Collection - Series and Hardcover Review! IMAGE COMICS
  • Tutorial - Lazarus Free Pascal, creating Sistem From zero to expert
  • Tutorial - acordeon menu with Lazarus

Ruby videos

+ Add

Ruby Programming Language - Full Course

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Lazarus and Ruby)

Lazarus

Ruby

IDE
100 100%
IDE
0% 0
Programming Language
28 28%
Programming Language
72% 72
Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
OOP
0 0%
OOP
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Lazarus and Ruby. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Lazarus and Ruby

Lazarus Reviews

We have no reviews of Lazarus yet.
Be the first one to post

Ruby Reviews

The 10 Best Programming Languages to Learn Today
With the growing popularity of Apple operating systems and applications, having Swift programming skills under your belt is a wise investment. Swift shares some similar characteristics with programming languages Ruby and Python.
Source: ict.gov.ge

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ruby should be more popular than Lazarus. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Lazarus mentions (1)

  • Are we GUI Yet? The state of building user interfaces in Rust
    > nearly as easy and pleasant as WinForms with VisualStudio Check out Lazarus: http://lazarus-ide.org It is WAY easier than WinForms. WinForms' VS "integration" feels as if they started with what Delphi 1 could do back in 1995 or so, implemented most of it and then decided that is enough. Lazarus' GUI tools are way above and beyond anything WinForms can do and the underlying LCL is crossplatform using... - Source: Hacker News / almost 4 years ago

Ruby mentions (4)

  • What I posted this week about Ruby
    On Thursday, I shared the importance of contributing to Ruby's documentation, and I wanted to show that even a small contribution can help. Thus, I showed a small PR I submitted for the ruby-lang.org website:. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • A full-stack serverless application with AssemblyLift and Next.js
    The counter function is written in Ruby. Since Ruby is an interpreted language, AssemblyLift deploys a customized Ruby 3.1 interpreter compiled to WebAssembly, which executes the function handler. Since the interpreter is somewhat large, the cold-start time of a Ruby function tends to be larger than that of a Rust function. Our counter is being run in the backround, so we're fine with it being a little bit laggy... - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Why is no one promoting ruby?
    But, in general I was told use rubyapi.org unless you _really_ want to stick with the ruby-lang.org docs for all you do (which is fine) or to dig more into some object hierarchy, etc. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Looking for pwsh (core/open source, v7) integration w/ rbenv, asdf
    [2] 'rbenv' - https://github.com/rbenv/rbenv - Ruby version management utility. Run something like rbenv install 3.1.1 to install that version on your system (requires related project ruby-build), then rbenv local 3.1.1 in your code's directory to specify that for any ruby command in that directory only, you want to use version 3.1.1 that you installed through rbenv. Does other useful stuff too. Only does Ruby,... Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Lazarus and Ruby, you can also consider the following products

Microsoft Visual Studio - Microsoft Visual Studio is an integrated development environment (IDE) from Microsoft.

Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.

Free Pascal - Free Pascal (aka FPK Pascal) is a 32 and 64 bit professional Pascal compiler.

JavaScript - Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

Qt Creator - Qt Creator is a cross-platform C++, JavaScript and QML integrated development environment. It is the fastest, easiest and most fun experience a C++ developer could wish for.

C++ - Has imperative, object-oriented and generic programming features, while also providing the facilities for low level memory manipulation

Loading...