Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

LAVfilters VS FLIF

Compare LAVfilters VS FLIF and see what are their differences

Img.vision
Image hosting & video hosting for eCommerce sellers featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

LAVfilters logo LAVfilters

LAV Filters are a set of open-source DirectShow filters, aimed to eventually replace the better...

FLIF logo FLIF

Free Lossless Image Format
  • LAVfilters Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14
  • FLIF Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-20

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to LAVfilters and FLIF)

LAVfilters

FLIF

Audio Player
100 100%
Audio Player
0% 0
Image Optimisation
0 0%
Image Optimisation
100% 100
Media Player
100 100%
Media Player
0% 0
Image Editing
0 0%
Image Editing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using LAVfilters and FLIF. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FLIF seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

LAVfilters mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LAVfilters yet. Tracking of LAVfilters recommendations started around Mar 2021.

FLIF mentions (9)

  • JPEG XL gains support by a billion+ devices
    JXL contains FLIF, one of the most efficient lossless formats. Source: 11 months ago
  • Google Chrome Is Already Preparing To Deprecate JPEG-XL (~3x smaller than JPEG, HDR, lossless, alpha, progressive, recompression, animations)
    As for lossless image compression, FLIF is based off of a deriviative of CABAC (used by H264) called MANIAC (which I couldn't find any information for). As mentioned on the website in general it outperforms PNG at around 33% smaller files. Interestingly enough, FLIF is a predecessor to JPEG-XL which is what this post is talking about. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Google Chrome Is Already Preparing To Deprecate JPEG-XL
    I'm a huge fan of AV1 for video, but for images JPEG-XL is simply the better codec than AVIF. If you've not actually looked closely at a comparison and are just on the side of AVIF in this debate because it's based on AV1 (and maybe you hate HEVC / HEIC), I'd urge you to look closer. Jpeg XL is pretty unrelated to Jpeg, Jpeg 2000 and Jpeg XR and instead a successor of Google Guetzli, FLIF and newer research. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Pain in the ass
    Legally they had no choice because jpeg xl is based on flif.info and https://github.com/google/pik but the flif has LGPL license which should open source the rest.. However regardless the media group didn't really do much other than write some standard and slap their name on it. Wasn't their work. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Pain in the ass
    No this is a niche format like FLIF was flif.info which got embedded in jpeg xl along with other image technologies. The tech behind QOI and many other things is great, and hopefully the research goes into usage in the future but it won't get mass adoption. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing LAVfilters and FLIF, you can also consider the following products

K-Lite Codec Pack - K-Lite Codec Pack is a collection of codecs, DirectShow filters and tools.

ImageOptim - Faster web pages and apps.

CCCP: Combined Community Codec Pack - The CCCP: Combined Community Codec Pack is a codec pack specifically built for playing videos (including mkv).

OptiPNG - OptiPNG is a command-line PNG optimizer that recompresses image files to a smaller size, without...

AC3Filter - AC3Filter is a high quality free audio decoder and processor filter.

JPEG Resampler - Jpeg Resampler, nástroj pro konverzi a změnu velikosti obrázků, snadné použití, zdarma

Loading...