No features have been listed yet.
Based on our record, Launchpad.net seems to be a lot more popular than SCM-Manager. While we know about 65 links to Launchpad.net, we've tracked only 3 mentions of SCM-Manager. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
This doesn’t sound right at all. Ubuntu itself doesn’t have an ESR package, only https://packages.ubuntu.com/focal/firefox which is at 125. The Mozilla PPA does have an ESR package, but per https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa?field.series_filter=focal it’s at 115. has been supported since Firefox 98, meaning ESR 91 was the last release lacking it, and it reached end of support... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
I agree, but I think that model of GPG is not how it's used any more. I think nowadays people upload a one-shot CI key, which is used to sign builds. So you're basically saying "The usual machine built this". Which is good information, don't get me wrong, but it's much less secure than "John was logged into his laptop and entered the password for the key that signed this" So, you're right, that GPG verifies... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
You can use https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/, but that's no official Mozilla repository. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
As a user of the PPA packages (https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa), now I'm confused. Are these the same packages? Should I switch? I'd have appreciated at least a mention in the article. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
There's also a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa Though you'll have to convince Ubuntu to prefer that instead of the snap. It's not hard, certainly easier than installing Debian which is probably still what I should have done. I think I used this guide: https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt-ubuntu-22-04 Though what that doesn't tell you is that the snap... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
You might take a look at SCM Manager - https://scm-manager.org/. Source: about 1 year ago
The source code management tool SCM-Manager can be used to manage Git, Mercurial as well as Subversion repositories. This makes the tool much more flexible than other solutions that only support one kind of repositories, e,g, Git. This makes the tool particularly valuable for companies that still have Mercurial repositories, for example, but would like to switch to Git. But even if only one repository type is... - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Have people used SCM Manager [1]? I recently found it on the Mercurial self-hosting page [2], and while it seems pretty good to me (at least for a single person use-case), the fact that I never hear of it (as much as Gogs or Gitea) makes me think that it may have some non-obvious issues with it. [1]: https://scm-manager.org/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.
GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab
Bonobo Git Server - Set up your own self hosted git server on IIS for Windows.
BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.
Gitea - A painless self-hosted Git service
SourceForge - The Complete Open-Source and Business Software Platform.