Kotest VS Mockito

The extensions are not particularly useful in this scenario because the described functionality can be incorporated into the Host class. On the other hand, they flourish in test frameworks like Kotest and enable the rapid development of useful add-ons like custom matchers. Extending third-party libraries with utility functions is another prevalent use case. In the next sections, we'll zero in on this specific aspect. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Kotest/kotest: Powerful, elegant and flexible test framework for Kotlin with additional assertions, property testing and data driven testing. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

I would say no. Mocking is generally creating a mock object. Like with Mockito. https://site.mockito.org. Source: 12 months ago

Could you explain how this relates to Mockito? Could it be used together perhaps for more advanced mocking? Source: over 1 year ago

You could use mocks, but you'd basically be implementing JSch. I'm not mocking a framework, and recently learned my misgivings have a name: the soviet police station anti-pattern. Source: over 1 year ago

In Mockito it exists the possibilty to use ArgumentCaptor to allow developers to verify the arguments used during the call of mocked method, but not the result itself. Indeed, in the current release of Mockito it's not possible to capture it and my solution to do that is to build a ResultCaptor class which implements the Answer interface and generify it for more conveniance. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

So I am building my own little project, which you can read about HERE and I have made the decision to use as few libraries as possible. Now that I am doing some testing I need some mock objects, which means I have to try to recreate Mockito. So this series will be me recreating Mockito the best I can. This post will be about creating a simple single use case implementation that gets our annotation working. It... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago