Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Kitty terminal VS ZOC Terminal

Compare Kitty terminal VS ZOC Terminal and see what are their differences

Kitty terminal logo Kitty terminal

Super fast, GPU and OpenGL based terminal emulator with tiling support

ZOC Terminal logo ZOC Terminal

ZOC is a professional SSH/telnet client and terminal emulator. With its impressive list of emulations and features, it is a snap to access hosts and mainframes via secure shell, telnet, serial cable, modem/isdn and other methods of communication.
  • Kitty terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-21
  • ZOC Terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-08

Kitty terminal features and specs

  • Performance
    Kitty is designed to be a fast and efficient terminal, with support for GPU rendering. This can provide smoother and quicker display updates, especially beneficial for intensive command-line tasks.
  • Features
    Kitty offers a rich set of features including support for tabs, multiple layouts, and extensions. It also supports features like ligatures, image display, and sixel graphics.
  • Customization
    Kitty is highly customizable, allowing users to modify key bindings, color schemes, and more through its comprehensive configuration files.
  • Remote Control
    Kitty provides a remote control framework, which allows users to script and control the terminal from the command line or other external programs.
  • Platform Support
    Kitty is available on multiple platforms including Linux, macOS, and Windows (through WSL), making it versatile for various operating systems.
  • Active Development
    The terminal is actively maintained by its developers, ensuring regular updates, bug fixes, and the addition of new features.

Possible disadvantages of Kitty terminal

  • Learning Curve
    Given its extensive feature set and customization options, there can be a steep learning curve for new users unfamiliar with its configuration and advanced features.
  • Configuration Complexity
    The extensive customization options, while powerful, can be overwhelming and may require a considerable amount of time to configure to a user's liking.
  • Font Support
    Although Kitty supports font ligatures and several other advanced font features, some users have reported occasional issues with font rendering and compatibility.
  • Resource Usage
    While designed for performance, the use of GPU rendering can mean higher resource usage compared to simpler terminals, which might be noticeable on older hardware.
  • Documentation
    Though extensive, the documentation can sometimes be challenging to navigate for new users, making it harder to find specific information or solutions to particular problems.
  • No Native Windows Support
    Kitty does not have native Windows support; it runs on Windows through the Windows Subsystem for Linux (WSL). This might not be ideal for users looking for a fully native Windows terminal experience.

ZOC Terminal features and specs

  • Versatile Connectivity
    ZOC Terminal supports a wide range of protocols such as SSH, Telnet, and serial communication, making it suitable for connecting to diverse systems and devices.
  • Tabbed Sessions
    It allows users to open multiple terminal sessions in a tabbed interface, providing a convenient way to manage different connections without cluttering the desktop.
  • Session Management
    ZOC Terminal offers robust session management features, including the ability to save sessions, organize them into folders, and quickly access frequently used connections.
  • Scripting Capabilities
    It supports scripting in languages like REXX, which can be used to automate tasks and streamline workflows, enhancing productivity for advanced users.
  • Customizability
    The terminal provides extensive customization options, including keyboard mappings, color schemes, and font styles, allowing users to tailor the interface to their preferences.

Possible disadvantages of ZOC Terminal

  • Cost
    ZOC Terminal is a commercial product, which means it requires a purchase or license for continued use, making it less appealing for those seeking a free solution.
  • Complexity for Beginners
    The rich feature set and extensive customization options can be overwhelming for beginners, making it less user-friendly compared to simpler terminal emulators.
  • Limited Platform Support
    ZOC Terminal is primarily designed for Windows and macOS, which limits its availability for users on other operating systems like Linux.
  • Resource Intensive
    Due to its advanced features, ZOC Terminal may consume more system resources compared to more lightweight terminal emulators, potentially affecting performance on less powerful machines.

Analysis of Kitty terminal

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Kitty is a highly regarded terminal emulator that is considered good by many users.

Why this product is good

  • Kitty is fast, feature-rich, and supports GPU rendering, which can improve performance. It is highly customizable, supports modern terminal features, and has a friendly and active community. Additionally, it supports features like tabs, layouts, and window management, which many users find convenient.

Recommended for

  • Users who require a fast and efficient terminal emulator.
  • Those who need advanced features and customization options.
  • Developers who appreciate GPU acceleration for rendering.
  • Anyone looking for a terminal emulator with active community support.

Kitty terminal videos

Kitty Is A Fast And Feature Rich Terminal Emulator

ZOC Terminal videos

How to Synchronise or Open ZOC Terminal in GNS3 instead of inbuilt GNS3 putty

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Kitty terminal and ZOC Terminal)
SSH
75 75%
25% 25
Terminal Tools
85 85%
15% 15
Server Management
70 70%
30% 30
OS & Utilities
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Kitty terminal and ZOC Terminal. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Kitty terminal and ZOC Terminal

Kitty terminal Reviews

We have no reviews of Kitty terminal yet.
Be the first one to post

ZOC Terminal Reviews

MobaXterm for Mac: Best Alternatives to MobaXterm for Mac
ZOC is a popular terminal emulator software developed for Mac OS and Windows computer. It is a reliable and elegant tool that connects you to hosts and mainframes via SSH, Telnet and Serial Cable. The impressive list of emulations and powerful features make ZOC Terminal the best alternative to MobaXterm for Mac with modern user interface.
Top 10 Best MobaXterm Alternatives for Windows, macOS & Linux In 2021
ZOC Terminal has been promoted as a popular ssh customer and terminal emulator that support Windows and macOS. It has a big list of emulations and features, that makes it among the very best tools for tasks such as connecting to hosts and mainframes utilizing a safe and secure shell, telnet, and other offered communication methods. It has a present user interface in which...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Kitty terminal seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 93 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Kitty terminal mentions (93)

  • Optimizing My Dev Workflow in 2025
    Initially, I used the Mac's built-in Terminal, but encountered issues with font loading. This led me to explore alternative terminal options. I initially chose Kitty, but after the official release of Ghostty, I made the switch. It has been running flawlessly for me. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • iTerm2 Critical Security Fix
    Kitty (https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty) has been my go to for many years and with tmux it's fantastic. I have heard a lot of great things about https://ghostty.org/ but haven't had a chance to check it out. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Preview images, videos, fonts, PDFs ... in Vifm.
    The terminal I am currently using is st but I have also tested this "Vifm" enhancement in kitty and alacritty. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Show HN: Shpool, a Lightweight Tmux Alternative
    Oh, this might be the missing piece of the puzzle for me to get rid of tmux! I've been using screen/tmux for a long time. Recently I switched to kitty[0] locally. I like kitty a lot! But I've been stuck with tmux on my servers for session persistence. [0]: https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
  • Ask HN: What macOS apps/programs do you use daily and recommend?
    Besides the usual Firefox/Chrome, Spotify, etc I use the following: - Karabiner-Elements for key remapping, specifically, for making caps lock into ctrl/esc. I don't know of anything else that does this job. Everyone who remaps keys seems to use this. - Kitty as my terminal of choice. I spend most of my time logged in remotely to a server via ssh where I attach to a tmux session. Kitty was easy enough to... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

ZOC Terminal mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ZOC Terminal yet. Tracking of ZOC Terminal recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Kitty terminal and ZOC Terminal, you can also consider the following products

wezterm - GPU-accelerated cross-platform terminal emulator and multiplexer made with Rust.

WinSSHTerm - A tabbed SSH solution for Windows, combining PuTTY/KiTTY, WinSCP and VcXsrv

iTerm2 - A terminal emulator for macOS that does amazing things.

Tabby.sh - Tabby is a free and open source SSH, local and Telnet terminal with everything you'll ever need.

Console2 - Console2 is a modern Windows terminal that features different profiles and color schemes, running as a system service and with support for VIP profiles.

MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more