Software Alternatives & Reviews

Kitty terminal VS rxvt-unicode

Compare Kitty terminal VS rxvt-unicode and see what are their differences

Kitty terminal logo Kitty terminal

Super fast, GPU and OpenGL based terminal emulator with tiling support

rxvt-unicode logo rxvt-unicode

5. 1 Transparency not working after upgrade to v9. 09; 5. 2 Remote hosts; 5. 3 Using rxvt-unicode as gmrun terminal; 5.
  • Kitty terminal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-21
  • rxvt-unicode Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-08

Kitty terminal videos

Kitty Is A Fast And Feature Rich Terminal Emulator

rxvt-unicode videos

No rxvt-unicode videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Kitty terminal and rxvt-unicode)
SSH
53 53%
47% 47
Terminal Tools
74 74%
26% 26
Server Management
54 54%
46% 46
Tool
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Kitty terminal and rxvt-unicode. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Kitty terminal and rxvt-unicode

Kitty terminal Reviews

We have no reviews of Kitty terminal yet.
Be the first one to post

rxvt-unicode Reviews

The 10 Best Linux Terminal Emulators
The key feature of rxvt-Unicode is that it is rock solid as software. It hardly crashes and is free of glitches. Experienced Linux users also prefer it because the main rxvt-Unicode program runs as a daemon, conserving system resources. Developers might love to try its support of Perl extensions which might increase productivity.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Kitty terminal seems to be a lot more popular than rxvt-unicode. While we know about 88 links to Kitty terminal, we've tracked only 3 mentions of rxvt-unicode. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Kitty terminal mentions (88)

  • Warp, the modern terminal, is now available for Linux
    A terminal with built-in telemetry and a pricing model... Just what I never wanted! To avoid being too negative, I'll offer the option of Kitty[1]. My current favorite terminal. Supports many features. Including my personal favorites: * ctrl+c (as opposed to stupid things like ctrl+shift+c) to copy data only when you have content selected. Otherwise, ctrl+c sends a sigint like normal. * font ligature support (a... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • I Just Wanted Emacs to Look Nice – Using 24-Bit Color in Terminals
    IME, this is like the golden age of terminal apps in general and macOS-compatible ones in particular. There are several really good terminals for macOS: [iTerm2 app](https://iterm2.com/) [Kitty terminal](https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/) [WezTerm terminal](https://wezfurlong.org/wezterm/index.html) [Alacritty](https://github.com/alacritty/alacritty) -... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Waveterm
    I haven’t tried this yet (so please take my commentary with a grain of salt), but my initial thoughts are: (1) it looks interesting, (2) it looks overwhelming (there’s a lot going on in those screenshots), and (3) it’s likely slow (I might be completely wrong). To elaborate a bit… 1. I love good design work and well-designed (UI-wise) software, and it certainly looks like the creators of Wave Terminal have made... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Contour: Modern and Fast Terminal Emulator
    There are lots of terminal projects recently. Ghostty (https://mitchellh.com/ghostty) and Terminal Click (https://terminal.click) come to mind. Also Warp and Fig but they don't appeal to me because they're proprietary (and Fig got acquired by Amazon). I've been very happy with kitty (https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/) for years and it would take a lot to make me switch. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Linux Terminal Emulators Have the Potential of Being Much Faster
    I favor kitty[0] and zutty[1]. Gnome terminal / libvte is and has always been slow, and alacritty might have good throughput, but sadly is high latency. 0. https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/ 1. https://tomscii.sig7.se/zutty/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
View more

rxvt-unicode mentions (3)

  • tabby - a terminal for the modern age
    There are many terminal emulators, for throughput, predictable behavior with modern features, quake style, theming, tabs, and much more. Most of the features you need are supported by urxvt, and if it's not, there's sure to be another non-electron terminal emulator that has exactly what you need. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What terminal emulator do you use?
    Urxvt — Highly extendable (with Perl) unicode enabled rxvt-clone terminal emulator featuring tabbing, url launching, a Quake style drop-down mode and pseudo-transparency http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/rxvt-unicode.html. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Any good truecolor terminals ?
    x11-terms/rxvt-unicode Available versions: (~)9.22-r7t *9999lt {-24-bit-color 256-color blink fading-colors +font-styles gdk-pixbuf iso14755 +mousewheel +perl -sgrmouse startup-notification unicode3 +utmp +wtmp xft} Homepage: http://software.schmorp.de/pkg/rxvt-unicode.html Description: rxvt clone with xft and unicode support. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Kitty terminal and rxvt-unicode, you can also consider the following products

wezterm - GPU-accelerated cross-platform terminal emulator and multiplexer made with Rust.

MobaXterm - Enhanced terminal for Windows with X11 server, tabbed SSH client, network tools and much more

iTerm2 - A terminal emulator for macOS that does amazing things.

Gnome Terminator - Terminator is one of the most useful and dynamic terminal emulators for Unix based operating systems.

Console - Console is a Windows console window enhancement.

Tabby.sh - Tabby is a free and open source SSH, local and Telnet terminal with everything you'll ever need.