Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Keycloak VS Azure Virtual WAN

Compare Keycloak VS Azure Virtual WAN and see what are their differences

Keycloak logo Keycloak

Open Source Identity and Access Management for modern Applications and Services.

Azure Virtual WAN logo Azure Virtual WAN

Learn about Virtual WAN automated scalable branch-to-branch connectivity, available regions, and partners.
  • Keycloak Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-20
  • Azure Virtual WAN Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20

Keycloak videos

What is Keycloak and what are the main features | DevNation Live

More videos:

  • Review - Keycloak Overview
  • Review - Easily Secure Your Front and Back End app with Keycloak

Azure Virtual WAN videos

Azure Virtual WAN in 13 minutes

More videos:

  • Demo - Azure Virtual Wan Demo. Connect your remote offices, data centers, users, vnets with Virtual WAN
  • Review - Zero to Hero with Azure Virtual WAN from Derek Smith

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Keycloak and Azure Virtual WAN)
Identity And Access Management
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Identity Provider
100 100%
0% 0
Log Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Keycloak and Azure Virtual WAN. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Keycloak and Azure Virtual WAN

Keycloak Reviews

12 User Authentication Platforms [Auth0, Firebase Alternatives]
You can integrate Keycloak with your applications to have a single-sign-in and single-sign-out experience. Moreover, one can activate social logins without any modification in code. Additionally, it allows user authentication via existing OpenID Connect or SAML 2.0
Source: geekflare.com
10+ Open-source Single-Sign On (SSO) Solutions
Keycloak is a free, open-source identity and access management system with highly configurable Single-Sign-On (SSO) support.
Source: medevel.com
10 Best Auth0 Alternatives and Similar Platforms
Keycloak may be quite beneficial because it provides a built-in method for syncing with databases, such as LDAP or Active Directory, when your users already are registered on. If you use Social Login for social platforms such as Facebook, Keycloak might be a great tool for your organization.
Top 5 Open Source Single Sign-On Software In the Year 2021
KeyCloak is another free software that is based on OpenID Connect, OAuth2.0, and SAML2.0. It provides SSO capabilities across web applications and web services. Above all, this open source software provides integrations with LDAP and Active Directory. There is a logical user interface where users can manage roles, permissions, and sessions. Moreover, this free solution...
IAM: A comparison of open-source tools
/ Digitalberry news / IAM: A comparison of open-source toolsIAM: A comparison of open-source toolsWhy use an Identity Provider (IdP)?Comparative study of Identity Providers (IdP)1. Our team’s first choice: Keycloak2. In second place of our comparative study: Gluu3. Special mention: FusionAuthDiscover our expertiseContact our experts

Azure Virtual WAN Reviews

We have no reviews of Azure Virtual WAN yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Virtual WAN should be more popular than Keycloak. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Keycloak mentions (4)

  • Beyond the login page
    Most of the time nowadays, I prefer offloading this to an identity provider, using OpenID Connect or soon Federated Credential Management (FedCM), even if that means shipping an identity provider as part of the deliverables (I generally go with Keycloak, with keycloak-config-cli to provision its configuration). I'm obviously biased though as I work in IT services, developping software mainly for... - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Okta Says Hackers Stole Data for All Customer Support Users
    Yet another breach of Okta... Why are companies not running something like keycloak [1] themselves? Are administrative/maintenance costs too high or is it plausible deniability? [1] https://keycloak.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • I built a ready-to-use auth server with TypeScript and Express.js
    I'd stick with a solution like https://keycloak.org in that instance. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Authelia is an open-source authentication/authorization server with 2FA/SSO
    A few more projects in this space: - Keycloak (you won't get fired for picking this)[0] - CloudFoundry's UAA[1] - Gluu [2] - Keratin [3] - OpenUnison [4] - Dex[5] - Netlify's GoTrue[6] All of these solutions are a bit different but here are some of the axes: - Whether or not they function as an OAuth provider - Whether they're centered around application-user-login (email + password) or application auth (OAuth) or... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

Azure Virtual WAN mentions (6)

  • Could you have 300 locations connected to one Azure tenancy via site-to-site VPN?
    Azure gateways have limitations (eg100). Check with a Microsoft partner or look into recommended azure virtual wan (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/virtual-wan-about). Source: 12 months ago
  • Need help with VNet Peering
    I think you are looking for: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/virtual-wan-about. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Azure Virtual Firewall Query
    They also mentioned here that they can use Azure Virtual WAN. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Questions about NGFW and SD-WAN
    Https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/virtual-wan-about or https://www.megaport.com/ gives you a great backbone. You can create HUBS with any kind of NGFW. THE NGFW at the spokes/branches provides "the last mile" connection. Source: over 2 years ago
  • VNET peering Hub and Spoke issue
    We have had great success with Azure Virtual WANs. They make many of the hassles you have just go away. They aren't free, but they are faster and easier to set up. You save money on the manpower hours. Https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/virtual-wan/virtual-wan-about. Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Keycloak and Azure Virtual WAN, you can also consider the following products

Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.

Cisco DNA Center - Find and resolve network issues with Cisco DNA Center. Provides software-based network automation and assurance. Control and manage intent-based networks.

Okta - Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices

Nmap - Nmap Free Security Scanner, Port Scanner, & Network Exploration Tool. Download open source software for Linux, Windows, UNIX, FreeBSD, etc.

OneLogin - On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more

Ubiquiti Network Management System - Ubiquiti Network Management System manages all the EdgeMAX, EdgeSwitch, airMAX and UFiber devices.