Kate VS Pluma

Kate Reviews

Pluma Reviews

1. Apon    

   about 3 years ago
   It's good

   I have found it really useful. Thanks. Keep developing it. Good luck.

Kate mentions (44)

• JetBrains' unremovable AI assistant meets irresistible outcry

  Have a look at Kate, its not bad and has good support for LSPs https://kate-editor.org. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

• Multiple Notepad++ Flaws Let Attackers Execute Arbitrary Code

  Maybe there are power features or something which makes Notepad++ better, but for my usage Kate (https://kate-editor.org/) fits the same niche. Fast startup / UI, but it has enough features to technically be an IDE (including an LSP apparently). - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• In you opinion is it better to code the arduino in the arduino language or c++, and do you prefer the arduino IDE or vs code IDE

  The Arduino IDE is quite primitive though, and poorly suited for larger or complex projects - if it starts getting in my way I'll feed my project to kate and a makefile. Source: 12 months ago

• "Why people pirate Microsoft Word" and the problems with everyday software like Microsoft Office being ridiculously expensive.

  Kate - a very powerful, very fearure-rich (including language server support for IDE-quality code completion and analysis and error checking for most mainstream languages) alternative to VS Code (has a very similar layout, git integration, and command pallette) that's much faster and lighter and isn't from Microsoft (it's FLOSS). Source: about 1 year ago

• A lightweight editor for rust and python

  Https://kate-editor.org can't understand why it is never mentioned in editor-threads. Source: about 1 year ago

Pluma mentions (0)