Karate VS JJazzLab
Compare Karate VS JJazzLab and see what are their differences
Music designed for the brain to enhance focus, relaxation, meditation, naps and sleep within 10 - 15 minutes of use.
featured
Karate
Robot framework
Cucumber
Postman
Ghost Inspector
browserling
BrowserStack
soapUI
JJazzLab
Band-in-a-Box
MMA
Guitar Pro 7
Sibelius
Impro-Visor
ChordPulse
NtEd
JJazzLab is a free and open-source application which automatically generates backing tracks for any song.
You type in chord symbols, select a rhythm (style), then JJazzLab generates a complete backing track with drums, bass, guitar, keyboard, strings, etc. JJazzLab can read Yamaha style files, which gives you access to thousands of free styles.
JJazzLab creates realistic and non-boring backing tracks, which can be easily customized even for complex songs.
Karate JJazzLabJJazzLab's answer:
JJazzLab's answer:
It's free, it's simple yet powerful and constantly evolving.
JJazzLab's answer:
JJazzLab's answer:
As a jazz/funk pianist I have tried most of the auto-accompaniment or backing tracks apps (Band In a Box, etc). They are good indeed and I had some fun at first, but I quickly got frustrated: I missed the intensity dynamics which help develop interesting solos. I was aware that a program will never match a real band, but I had a few ideas how to do better. That’s why I decided to start developing JJazzLab.
JJazzLab's answer:
Java, Apache Netbeans platform.
JJazzLab's answer:
Based on our record, Karate seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
This is why we need better tools which will give benefits for the added complexity. If you need to create both the feature files AND the code, it's just complexity with little benefits. But frameworks like https://github.com/karatelabs/karate are hiding this complexity and remove the code layer entirely. Which, in my view, this is where you need to be in 2023, particularly for API testing. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Congrats on the launch ! I'm the lead dev of [Karate](https://github.com/karatelabs/karate) and the IDE and traditional solutions fall short. I hope Karate's syntax passes your "memory friendly" test :) We get regular feedback is that it is easy to read and even non-programmers can pick it up. One thing I feel we do really well is chaining of HTTP requests. And we have plugins for... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
I recently found a BDD style tool that has native HTTP comprehension, which seems like it hits a similar area in the testing concept space: https://github.com/karatelabs/karate. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
I'm doing something similar but taking the approach of karate framework making it a kitchen sink of e2e testing tools. Love to see another rust based solution! I might open source mine at some point, I've implemented curl + webdriver, I will expand to support other things in my stack like desktop automation. Source: over 1 year ago
We use karate to test our fully integrated graphql backend. Has Gherkin language support. Source: over 1 year ago
Robot framework - Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance...
Band-in-a-Box - Band-in-a-Box is so easy to use!
Cucumber - Cucumber is a BDD tool for specification of application features and user scenarios in plain text.
MMA - “MMA—Musical MIDI Accompaniment” is an accompaniment generator.
Postman - The Collaboration Platform for API Development
Guitar Pro 7 - Create, play and share your tabs