Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

JW Player VS Amazon Elastic Transcoder

Compare JW Player VS Amazon Elastic Transcoder and see what are their differences

IsDown.app
Monitor all your cloud services with our status page aggregator. IT teams choose IsDown to monitor all their vendors and get alerts whenever an outage occurs. Integration with Datadog, PagerDuty, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and a lot more. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JW Player logo JW Player

JW Player is an embeddable media player.

Amazon Elastic Transcoder logo Amazon Elastic Transcoder

Amazon Elastic Transcoder is media transcoding in the cloud.
  • JW Player Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25
  • Amazon Elastic Transcoder Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-02

JW Player

Website
jwplayer.com
Release Date
2004 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
New York
City
New York
Founder(s)
Adam Fawer
Employees
100 - 249
Edit details

Amazon Elastic Transcoder

Website
aws.amazon.com
Release Date
-
Edit details

JW Player features and specs

  • Customization
    JW Player offers extensive customization options, allowing developers to tailor the video player to fit their branding and functionality requirements.
  • Streaming Quality
    The platform supports adaptive bitrate streaming which provides a smooth viewing experience by adjusting video quality based on user's internet connection.
  • Analytics
    JW Player includes comprehensive analytics tools to track viewer engagement, viewership trends, and performance metrics.
  • Monetization
    It has built-in support for monetization through ads, offering integration with various ad networks and ad technologies.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    JW Player is compatible with multiple devices and platforms, including desktop browsers, mobile devices, and smart TVs.
  • Ease of Integration
    The player can be easily integrated with CMSs, frameworks, and various web technologies through its comprehensive API and developer tools.

Possible disadvantages of JW Player

  • Cost
    JW Player can be expensive, especially for small businesses and individual creators, as it charges based on usage and additional features.
  • Learning Curve
    There can be a steep learning curve for new users who are not familiar with advanced video player settings and customizations.
  • Limited Free Version
    The free version of JW Player has limited capabilities and branding, which might not be sufficient for professional use.
  • Ads Restrictions
    There are some limitations and restrictions when it comes to integrating third-party ad services, which can be a drawback for certain users.
  • Customer Support
    While JW Player offers customer support, some users have reported waiting times and variable quality of service.

Amazon Elastic Transcoder features and specs

  • Scalability
    Amazon Elastic Transcoder automatically scales to handle the volume of media files you need to process, accommodating fluctuating workloads without manual intervention.
  • Integration with AWS
    As an AWS service, Elastic Transcoder integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like S3 for storage and CloudFront for distribution, enhancing workflow efficiency.
  • Predefined Presets
    It offers a range of predefined presets that simplify the process of transcoding media into the desired formats for different devices and resolutions.
  • Pay-as-you-go Pricing
    Elastic Transcoder employs a pay-as-you-go pricing model, allowing users to only pay for what they use without upfront commitments.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon Elastic Transcoder

  • Complex Initial Setup
    Setting up Elastic Transcoder can be complex for users unfamiliar with AWS services, requiring an understanding of IAM roles, buckets, and other AWS concepts.
  • Pricing Complexity
    Although it offers a pay-as-you-go model, understanding the pricing structure in detail can be complicated, particularly when estimating costs for large-scale operations.
  • Performance Limitations
    For very high volume or extremely demanding media processing tasks, Elastic Transcoder might not offer the speed or customization that specialized solutions or on-premises systems can provide.
  • Limited Customization
    While Elastic Transcoder supports presets for convenience, there might be limited customization options compared to using dedicated, on-premise media processing software.

JW Player videos

+ Add

JW Player Employee Reviews - Q3 2018

More videos:

  • Tutorial - របៀប Download video ពី JW Player | How to download video from JW Player
  • Tutorial - How to use JW Player 7 with Wowza Streaming Engine
  • Review - JW Player Review: Daily user of JWPlayer
  • Review - Find Out About the Application Process at JW Player

Amazon Elastic Transcoder videos

+ Add

AWS Tutorial 38 - Amazon Elastic Transcoder

More videos:

  • Review - AWS Webcast - What's New with Amazon Elastic Transcoder

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JW Player and Amazon Elastic Transcoder)

JW Player

Amazon Elastic Transcoder

Video Platform
100 100%
Video Platform
0% 0
Video Converter
0 0%
Video Converter
100% 100
Marketing Platform
100 100%
Marketing Platform
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using JW Player and Amazon Elastic Transcoder. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare JW Player and Amazon Elastic Transcoder

JW Player Reviews

Top 26 Alternatives to Vimeo in 2024: Pricing, Features & More
JW Player is one of the alternatives to Vimeo that offers live streaming at a competitive price. So if you’re just starting live streaming and don’t want to pay the hefty costs to live stream on Vimeo, JW Player is Meta description: Explore the best Vimeo alternatives with our comprehensive 2024 guide. Choose from 26 platforms with detailed insights on features, pricing,...
Source: www.dacast.com
Best Online Video Platforms In 2023
Regarding online video platforms, JW Player can also be a fine option. Whether you’re a content creator or a business, JW Player’s versatile features cater to your videos. Its powerful API and analytics capabilities make it a standout choice for those looking to deliver an exemplary video experience.
Source: medium.com

Amazon Elastic Transcoder Reviews

We have no reviews of Amazon Elastic Transcoder yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Amazon Elastic Transcoder seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JW Player mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JW Player yet. Tracking of JW Player recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Amazon Elastic Transcoder mentions (7)

  • AV1 tool to auto compress old video files for archive
    Alternatively, if your Internet connection can handle it, you could upload your videos to a cloud service that processes them for you. For example, Amazon's AWS has a transcoding service called Elastic, which charges 3 cents per minute of video (half of that if it's lower than 720p). Might be worth the reduced time and effort for business use. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Converting Video Audio To A File Using AWS?
    If you're looking for an AWS specific solution, check out Amazon Elastic Transcoder. I think it'll do what you want with a pipeline and you can do it serverless. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Cloud computing noob question(s)!
    If you use https://aws.amazon.com/elastictranscoder/ then you don’t need a computer, it’s a managed service, get your files to s3 somehow and thats it. There are some other services from other providers that can do the same too, I strongly encourage to look into that, unless you have specific encoding specs that you can’t do somewhere. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Where should i compress the video
    However compressing on the server is the better option in case you want to generate gifs, thumbnails, and different sizes and formats of the video. A lot of big video streaming companies will use something like Amazons media convert. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Scaling node.js backend service (Help to choose perfect design pattern and tools)
    This is how I'd do it, but instead of using EC2 for step 5 I'd look into Elastic Transcoder. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JW Player and Amazon Elastic Transcoder, you can also consider the following products

VideoJS - VideoJS is an HTML5 Video Player, built with Javascript and CSS, with a fallback to a Flash video...

Rendi - Rendi is a simple REST API for FFmpeg. We take care the cloud infrastructure and costs, so you don't have to.

Plyr - A simple, accessible and customisable HTML5 media player

AWS Elemental MediaConvert - AWS Elemental MediaConvert is a file-based video processing service that allows video providers to transcode content for broadcast and multiscreen delivery at scale.

Flowplayer - Flowplayer is a video player for web sites.

Cloudinary - Cloudinary is a cloud-based service for hosting videos and images designed specifically with the needs of web and mobile developers in mind.

Loading...