JUnit VS Chai

Unlike I expected, setting up the project with Junit proved to be really time-consuming for me. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

First, I chose a testing framework for my java project. JUnit is the most pupular testing framework for java. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

This code defines a JUnit test case for the getStrings() method of the MyClass class. Then it creates an instance of MyClass, calls the getStrings() method, and asserts that the result is not null using the assertNotNull() method. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago

How you can link JUnit 5 tests with issues in your task tracker systems? - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

JUnit is a popular Java testing framework used for unit testing. It's an open-source tool that's designed to make it easy for developers to write and run automated tests. JUnit provides a set of annotations and assertions that can be used to define test cases and expected outcomes, and it can be easily integrated with other DevOps tools like Jenkins and Maven. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

Mocha as the test runner, Chai as the assertion library, and the Hardhat Chai Matchers to extend Chai with contracts-related functionality. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

Assertion library we used: Chai (comes with a lot of plugins worth exploring). - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

While this is fine and I could have perfectly moved all my tests to use said assertion style, I like the descriptive way Jest tests look like. As a quick way to maintain certain similarity I reached for ChaiJS, an assertion library that is mainly used with mocha. Chai offers expect like assertions that can arguably be more descriptive than Jest’s. Instead of writing expect(…).toBe(true), you’d write... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

The library offers a BDD testing style and fully exploits javascript promises - the resulting tests are simple, clear and expressive. Chakram is built on node.js, mocha, chai and request. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago