Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

jsPerf VS iperf

Compare jsPerf VS iperf and see what are their differences

Safetica
We believe data protection should make running your business easier, not harder. Safetica protects companies against insider threats, offers data loss protection, and supports regulatory compliance. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

jsPerf logo jsPerf

A performance playground for JavaScript developers. Easily create and share test cases and run cross-browser benchmarks to find out which code snippet is most efficient.

iperf logo iperf

A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool
  • jsPerf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-26
  • iperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17

jsPerf videos

No jsPerf videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

iperf videos

+ Add

Using Iperf to measure network speed / bandwidth

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use iperf to test local network LAN speed in Windows 10
  • Review - [HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to jsPerf and iperf)

jsPerf

iperf

Log Management
14 14%
Log Management
86% 86
Monitoring Tools
11 11%
Monitoring Tools
89% 89
Network & Admin
17 17%
Network & Admin
83% 83
Tool
100 100%
Tool
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using jsPerf and iperf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, iperf seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

jsPerf mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of jsPerf yet. Tracking of jsPerf recommendations started around Mar 2021.

iperf mentions (4)

  • Microsoft: Don't Use Iperf3 on Windows
    Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
  • Yet Another Bench Script (YABS): evaluate Linux server performance with this simple Bash script and utility
    Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Speed testing Visible with a modem
    File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: about 2 years ago
  • FTP upload speed isn't great
    I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing jsPerf and iperf, you can also consider the following products

benchmark.js - A benchmarking library that supports high-resolution timers & returns statistically significant results.

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

JSBench.me - Javascript performance benchmark playground based on Benchmark.js.

mtr - mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single...

PPerf - PowerShell Iperf GUI - A PowerShell script to start iperf and show the output (similar to Jperf).

Wireshark - Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer for Unix and Windows. It lets you capture and interactively browse the traffic running on a computer network.

Loading...