Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

JSON Web Token VS Cyberduck

Compare JSON Web Token VS Cyberduck and see what are their differences

Zoho Projects
Turn every Project into a Success Story with Zoho Projects featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JSON Web Token logo JSON Web Token

JSON Web Tokens are an open, industry standard RFC 7519 method for representing claims securely between two parties.

Cyberduck logo Cyberduck

A libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Backblaze B2, Azure & OpenStack Swift browser.
  • JSON Web Token Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19
  • Cyberduck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-12

JSON Web Token features and specs

  • Stateless
    Since JWTs are self-contained, they do not require server-side sessions, enabling stateless authentication and reducing server memory usage.
  • Scalability
    JWTs can easily be used in distributed systems and microservices architectures due to their stateless nature, facilitating horizontal scaling.
  • Decentralized Issuance
    Multiple issuers can create and sign their own tokens, allowing for more decentralized and flexible authentication mechanisms.
  • Performance
    JWTs eliminate the need for database lookups during authenticating requests, as the token contains all the necessary information, which can lead to performance improvements.
  • Cross-domain and Mobile Compatible
    JWTs are widely supported by different platforms and can easily be used in cross-domain situations and with mobile applications.
  • Security
    JWTs can be signed and optionally encrypted, ensuring the authenticity and integrity of the data they carry.

Possible disadvantages of JSON Web Token

  • Size
    JWTs tend to be larger than session IDs, which can increase the amount of data transmitted during requests.
  • Expiration Handling
    Managing token expiration can be complex. Once a token is issued, it remains valid until it expires or is explicitly revoked.
  • No Built-in Revocation
    Unlike sessions, JWTs cannot be easily revoked server-side, making it difficult to immediately invalidate tokens without additional mechanisms.
  • Security Risks
    If a JWT is intercepted or compromised, it can be used until it expires. Thus, it should be properly secured and transmitted over HTTPS.
  • Token Overhead
    Embedding too much information in the token payload can lead to performance overhead and potential data exposure risks.
  • Complexity
    Implementing JWT correctly requires a thorough understanding of security practices and token lifecycle management, which can add complexity to the system.

Cyberduck features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Cyberduck features a clean and intuitive interface that makes it easy for users to navigate and manage files across different cloud storage services and servers.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    The software supports a variety of protocols including FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, and Backblaze B2, making it versatile for different needs.
  • Open Source
    Cyberduck is open-source, which means it is freely available and continuously improved by a community of developers.
  • Integration with External Editors
    Cyberduck allows seamless integration with various external editors, enabling users to edit files directly on the server.
  • Bookmark Management
    The application offers robust bookmark management, allowing users to easily save and organize frequently accessed locations.
  • Strong Security Features
    Cyberduck includes strong security features such as support for SSH keys, two-factor authentication, and encrypted transfers with TLS/SSL.

Possible disadvantages of Cyberduck

  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported performance issues, such as slow transfer speeds and occasional freezes, especially when handling large files.
  • Resource Intensive
    Cyberduck can be resource-intensive, consuming a considerable amount of system memory and CPU, which can affect the performance of other applications.
  • Limited Support for Automation
    Unlike some other file transfer tools, Cyberduck lacks extensive built-in scripting or automation capabilities, which could be a drawback for power users looking to automate file operations.
  • Complex Initial Setup
    For users who are not familiar with the protocols supported, the initial setup and configuration can be confusing and time-consuming.
  • Occasional Stability Issues
    Some users have experienced occasional stability issues, including unexpected crashes or connection drops during transfers.

JSON Web Token videos

+ Add

JSON Web Tokens Suck - Randall Degges (DevNet Create 2018)

More videos:

  • Review - JSON Web Tokens with Public Key Signatures
  • Review - RFC 7519 JSON Web Token (JWT), Review

Cyberduck videos

+ Add

How to Use Cyberduck FTP Client

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JSON Web Token and Cyberduck)

JSON Web Token

Cyberduck

Identity Provider
100 100%
Identity Provider
0% 0
FTP Client
0 0%
FTP Client
100% 100
Identity And Access Management
100 100%
Identity And Access Management
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using JSON Web Token and Cyberduck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare JSON Web Token and Cyberduck

JSON Web Token Reviews

We have no reviews of JSON Web Token yet.
Be the first one to post

Cyberduck Reviews

10 Best FTP Clients for WordPress Users (Mac and Windows)
Cyberduck doesn’t provide support for Linux, but Mac and Windows users find it rather simple to use and fast for transferring files to and from local and remote locations. Feel free to download the FTP client from the Cyberduck website or you have options for downloads on the Microsoft and Mac App Stores.
Source: kinsta.com
15 Best Rclone Alternatives 2022
Furthermore, Cyberduck integrates with Cryptomator – one of the rclone alternatives mentioned earlier. With the Cryptomator integration, you get access to extra features like filename encryption and file content encryption.
Source: rigorousthemes.com
7 Best FileZilla Alternatives to Use in 2022
Cyberduck offers a clean user interface which is very easy to use. Most of the web developers use Cyberduck FTP client. However, it is recommended for Mac users, which can be accessed for free. Using this app is completely free, and the users can donate to developers if they want to. This program works on Mac as well as Windows OS.
Source: techdator.net
6 FileZilla Alternatives for Safe File Transfers
While managing files can be challenging, searching for files with Cyberduck is easy and viewing them in Quick Look is as simple as pressing the spacebar. Cyberduck is also compatible with external editors, so you can open and edit files in any third-party editor. Whether you prefer TextWrangler, TextEdit, or Sublime Text, you’ll still be able to edit your files.
Source: www.dnsstuff.com
7 FileZilla Alternatives: What Type of FTP Client Are You Looking for?
Users today, like Cyberduck because it has a more modern look and is compatible with cloud services. While it is easy to use, Cyberduck doesn’t leave out the basics like search, resume, and drag & drop file management. Cyberduck is free to download and use, but they do ask for donations to help continue developing and supporting the product.
Source: www.exavault.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JSON Web Token should be more popular than Cyberduck. It has been mentiond 301 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JSON Web Token mentions (301)

  • OAuth or JWT? Everything Developers Need to Know in 2025
    ​Security Considerations • JWT o Always use HTTPS to prevent token interception o Set short expiration times o Avoid storing sensitive data in the token • OAuth o Always validate redirect URIs o Implement proper token revocation o Consider using PKCE for public clients References • The Ultimate Guide to Implementing Authentication in JavaScript Applications • OAuth 2.0 – RFC 6749 • JWT.io –... - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
  • Guide to JWT API Authentication
    Jwt.io is a great playground to get used to working with JWTs. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
  • Verifying Cognito access tokens - Comparing three JWT packages for Lambda authorizers
    The Lambda authorizer code decodes and verifies the token, and its business logic determines whether the request should proceed to the backend or be denied. Cognito access tokens are JSON Web Tokens (JWTs), and to simplify our coding, we might opt for an external package to handle token verification. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Authentication and Authorization Best Practices in ASP.NET Core
    You can decode the created JWT token using JWT IO web site to see what's inside. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How To Use JWT Token In React JS
    JWT.io – A great resource to decode, verify, and generate JWT tokens. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
View more

Cyberduck mentions (72)

  • Use CLI on any OS to read-write your iPhone folders (without cloud or cable)
    The WebDAV server is Class 1 compliant (Basic), compatible with WebDAV clients like Cyberduck, rclone (GUI & CLI, available on macOS, Windows, and Linux), etc. This guide will use Cyberduck, but rclone works too. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
  • Getting Files from Point A to B: A Developer’s Guide to FTP
    Cyberduck: Nice macOS support, also handles SFTP. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Show HN: DrawDB – open-source online database diagram editor (a retro)
    Or could they just reach out to contributors and ask them to help? Or here’s another route: sell “licenses” regardless of the actual license. I think https://cyberduck.io/ has this: you can donate and get a key that removes the donation nag. You can’t go after the pirates, but would you really want to spend your time on that? (Of course, I would still reach out to the contributors first, explain the situation and... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • VSCode's SSH Agent Is Bananas
    > I distinctly remember seeing some program that was named something duck-related but for the life of me I can't remember any other specifics cyberduck - https://cyberduck.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
    Cyberduck: a cloud storage browser for Mac and Windows. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JSON Web Token and Cyberduck, you can also consider the following products

Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.

FileZilla - FileZilla is an FTP, or file transfer protocol, client. It lets individuals transfer single files or batches to a web server. For many years, FTP was the standard for website design. Read more about FileZilla.

Firebase Authentication - Application and Data, Application Utilities, and User Management and Authentication

WinSCP - WinSCP is an open source free SFTP client and FTP client for Windows.

Spring Security - The Spring portfolio has many projects, including Spring Framework, Spring IO Platform, Spring Cloud, Spring Boot, Spring Data, Spring Security...

Transmit - Transmit is an FTP client for Mac OS X and Mac OS Classic (which is unsupported).

Loading...