Software Alternatives & Reviews

JSCAPE MFT Server VS Control-M

Compare JSCAPE MFT Server VS Control-M and see what are their differences

JSCAPE MFT Server logo JSCAPE MFT Server

Download the JSCAPE MFT server online today! This secure transfer server supports various protocols and allows for accelerated file transfers using AFTP.

Control-M logo Control-M

Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.
  • JSCAPE MFT Server Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-21
  • Control-M Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-12

JSCAPE MFT Server videos

How to Add an AFTP Service on JSCAPE MFT Server

More videos:

  • Review - Applying AS2 Encryption Using JSCAPE MFT Server 11.2
  • Review - Ad-Hoc File Transfers with JSCAPE MFT Server

Control-M videos

Control-M Version 8 Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Control-M Self Service Overview
  • Review - Connect With Control-M: Control-M/Server 9 High Availability

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JSCAPE MFT Server and Control-M)
File Sharing
100 100%
0% 0
IT Automation
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using JSCAPE MFT Server and Control-M. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare JSCAPE MFT Server and Control-M

JSCAPE MFT Server Reviews

We have no reviews of JSCAPE MFT Server yet.
Be the first one to post

Control-M Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
Job scheduling: On G2, the job scheduling feature receives the highest score with 9.4. However, Control-M alternatives, ActiveBatch and Redwood obtain higher scores for each category under functionality than Control-M (See Figure 5). Integrations/APIs: A user mentioned API and integration to other applications as a weak capability of the tool (Figure 1).
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Verdict: Redwood platform offers better performance and visibility than the Control-M. This tool supports over 25 scripting languages and interfaces such as Python, R, and PowerShell with built-in syntax highlighting and parameter replacement. It also features advanced architecture and provides safe passage to businesses looking for Control-M alternatives through its...
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
Control-M Reports provide insights into job execution and performance. While the BMC Control-M interface provides robust reporting capabilities, there are also alternatives to generate reports using tools such as SQL and Hadoop. These tools can extract data from Control-M job logs and generate custom reports based on specific business requirements.
Source: www.redwood.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JSCAPE MFT Server and Control-M, you can also consider the following products

GoAnywhere MFT - GoAnywhere is a managed file transfer (MFT) solution that secures and automates the exchange of data. GoAnywhere's interface and workflow features eliminate the need for custom programs, scripts, single-function tools or other manual methods.

ManageEngine RecoveryManager Plus - RecoveryManager Plus is one such enterprise backup solution which has the ability to easily backup and restores both the domain controllers and virtual machines.

GlobalSCAPE Enhanced File Transfer - With operational efficiency in mind, Globalscape’s Enhanced File Transfer™ (EFT™) Enterprise features quick and intuitive setup, advanced automation capabilities, real-time visibility into data transfers, and much more.

Heroku Enterprise - Heroku Enterprise is a flexible IT management for developers that lets them build apps using their preferred languages and tools like Ruby, Java, Python and Node.

CData Arc - Secure Data Integration & Managed File Transfer (MFT)

SECDO - SECDO offers automated endpoint security and incident response solutions