Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

jQuery VS Falcon

Compare jQuery VS Falcon and see what are their differences

ASocks
Clear, Fast & Unlimited. Residential & Mobile Proxies For Best Price. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

jQuery logo jQuery

The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Falcon logo Falcon

Ultraportable 2-in-1 Laptop
  • jQuery Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-22
  • Falcon Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-26

jQuery features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    jQuery simplifies complex JavaScript tasks by providing easy-to-use methods, which can lead to shorter development times and cleaner code.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    jQuery handles many browser inconsistencies, ensuring that your code works seamlessly across different browsers without additional effort.
  • Large Community and Ecosystem
    There is a vast community of developers who contribute plugins, extensions, and provide support, making it easier to find solutions and enhance functionality.
  • Animation and Effects
    jQuery offers built-in methods for creating animations and effects, allowing developers to enhance the user interface with minimal code.
  • AJAX Simplification
    The library provides straightforward methods for making AJAX calls, which simplifies the process of loading data asynchronously.
  • Documentation and Learning Resources
    Extensive documentation and a plethora of tutorials are available, making it easier for developers to learn and troubleshoot.

Possible disadvantages of jQuery

  • Performance Overhead
    Using jQuery can add overhead to your application due to its file size and additional abstraction, which can impact performance, especially in resource-constrained environments.
  • Relevance
    With the advent of modern JavaScript frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, and the improvements in native JavaScript (ES6+), the need for jQuery has decreased, making it less relevant in contemporary web development.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic usage is straightforward, mastering more advanced topics and optimizing performance can be challenging for newcomers.
  • Potential for Overuse
    Developers might rely too heavily on jQuery for tasks that can be efficiently handled by native JavaScript, leading to bloated codebases.
  • Maintenance and Legacy Code
    Projects heavily reliant on jQuery may face maintenance challenges as modern frameworks and practices evolve, requiring significant refactoring effort if transitioning away from jQuery.
  • Security
    Older jQuery versions have known security vulnerabilities, and continuing to use outdated versions can pose security risks. Regular updates are necessary to mitigate this issue.

Falcon features and specs

  • Performance
    Falcon is designed to be a highly performant framework, focusing on speed and efficiency. It avoids unnecessary overhead, which makes it faster than many other Python web frameworks.
  • Minimalism
    The framework is minimalistic and doesn't come with a lot of bells and whistles. This makes it easier to understand and use for developers who need to create lightweight applications.
  • Scalability
    Falcon is suitable for building APIs and microservices that need to handle a large number of requests efficiently. Its architecture supports horizontal scaling with ease.
  • Security
    Falcon includes sensible defaults and provides mechanisms to help you write secure web applications and APIs. It doesn't assume or enforce a specific security model, leaving flexibility for implementation.
  • Extensibility
    Falcon can be easily extended to support additional middleware, components, and libraries, making it adaptable for different types of projects.

Possible disadvantages of Falcon

  • Learning Curve
    Due to its minimalistic nature, developers who are used to more feature-rich frameworks may find Falcon's approach requires a period of adjustment.
  • Ecosystem
    Falcon doesn't have as extensive an ecosystem or as many third-party plugins as some other frameworks (like Django or Flask), which might limit functionality or require more custom development.
  • Documentation
    While Falcon does have documentation, it might not be as comprehensive or beginner-friendly as some other frameworks. This could make it challenging for new developers to get up to speed.
  • No Built-in ORM
    Falcon does not include an Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) layer, unlike some other frameworks. This means developers must integrate their choice of ORM separately, which can increase setup complexity.
  • Community Support
    Falcon's community is smaller when compared to other major web frameworks, which could mean fewer resources, third-party tools, and community-driven solutions available.

jQuery videos

+ Add

Quick jQuery Review

More videos:

  • Review - jQuery vs Vue, React and Angular
  • Review - Front-End Development, HTML & CSS, Javascript & jQuery by Jon Duckett | Book Review
  • Review - The Legend of jQuery in 100 Seconds
  • Review - ⭕The one book I regret not having as a beginning web developer || Jon Duckett JavaScript & jQuery

Falcon videos

+ Add

adidas Falcon Review

More videos:

  • Review - Falcon Age Review
  • Demo - UVI Falcon Review & Demo - The Ultimate VST [Review // Gear // Sound Demo]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to jQuery and Falcon)

jQuery

Falcon

Development Tools
100 100%
Development Tools
0% 0
Web Frameworks
0 0%
Web Frameworks
100% 100
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
Javascript UI Libraries
0% 0
Python Web Framework
0 0%
Python Web Framework
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using jQuery and Falcon. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare jQuery and Falcon

jQuery Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
jQuery dramatically simplifies JS programming and is easy to learn and use. It is highly extensible and makes web pages load faster. jQuery wraps up a lot of standard functions making the job of the developer easy. A JS code of several lines could be just a method to be called in jQuery. It also has many plugins to perform different tasks. Some of the features of jQuery are...
Source: hackr.io
Top 15 jQuery Alternatives To Know
The world is full of newer technologies and there are alternatives available for all of them. jQuery is no different. The above-mentioned technologies can be a good alternative to jQuery though jQuery itself has a loyal user base of its own. Overall, it depends upon the organizational skills, requirements, budget, and objective, based on which stakeholders can take a call on...
Source: www.spec-india.com
Best Javascript libraries to use in 2021
jQuery has been in the development scene for a long time and has been the unprecedented king for webpage dev. It is one of the most common libraries used throughout the world, with more than 50% of websites using jQuery for their functioning. jQuery is a library used majorly for Document Object Model (DOM) manipulation. The DOM is a tree-like structure that represents all...
Source: codersera.com

Falcon Reviews

Top 8 Python Tools For App Development
About: Falcon is a reliable, high-performance Python web framework for building large-scale app backends and microservices. Falcon apps work with any WSGI or ASGI server, and it runs under CPython version 3.5+ and PyPy version 3.5+. Some of the features are mentioned below:-
Source: analyticsindiamag.com
17 Top Evernote Alternatives for Note-Taking for 2019
It’s not just visually pleasing, it’s also got a kickass name. Falcon users can write in markdown and enjoy live previews as they write. A beginner at writing in markdown? No worries—Falcon’s Markdown Helper guides you each step of the way.
Source: www.workzone.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, jQuery seems to be a lot more popular than Falcon. While we know about 102 links to jQuery, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Falcon. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

jQuery mentions (102)

  • The Unchaining: My Personal Journey Graduating from jQuery to Modern JavaScript
    When I was building a quick frontend to the LLM game, I used jQuery to quickly whip out a prototype. Only after I was happy with it, I ported the code to the modern DOM API. As a result, I totally removed the dependency on jQuery. This whole experience makes me wonder, do people still use jQuery, in this age of frontend engineering? I took some time over the weekend to port one of my old jQuery plugins. This is... - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago
  • This One jQuery Mistake Froze Our Web Page! Here's the Fix You Need to Know
    Whenever the number of items increased, the browser became slow, sometimes even unresponsive. At first, we thought it was a server issue or maybe too much data. But no — the problem was hiding inside a small line of jQuery. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Is jQuery Dead?
    Ah, jQuery — the library that powered a generation of web apps. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Understanding Awaitables: Coroutines, Tasks, and Futures in Python
    Then we have callbacks, which were popularized by AJAX calls. Back then, with jQuery, we could define handlers to deal with both success or failure cases. For instance, let's say we want to fetch the HTML markup of this blog (skipping error failure callback for brevity), we do. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • the entire history of JavaScript, i guess
    One of them is JQuery created by John Resig. The library addresses extremely-frustrating issues related to cross-browser compatibility that existed at the time. To this day, it remains the most widely used JavaScript library in terms of actual page loads. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

Falcon mentions (3)

  • Functional Testing as a Design Tool for Full Stack Projects. Part II: API server and Project Release
    Falcon — a lightning-fast, minimalist Python web API framework for building robust app back-ends and micro-services. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • A viable solution for Python concurrency
    This is why you run one process per core, and you'll typically have something like nginx+uWSGI distribute requests across them. I use this combination with https://falconframework.org/ and boto3 to spool HTTP POST requests to S3 and SQS and am pretty happy with it. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • The Top 5 Python Frameworks for Web Development
    Falcon is a Python Web framework for building large-scale app backends and microservices. It encourages the REST architectural style, and tries to do as little as possible while remaining highly effective. - Source: dev.to / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing jQuery and Falcon, you can also consider the following products

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Django - The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Node.js - Node.js is a platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

OpenSSL - OpenSSL is a free and open source software cryptography library that implements both the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, which are primarily used to provide secure communications between web browsers and …

Ruby on Rails - Ruby on Rails is an open source full-stack web application framework for the Ruby programming...

Loading...