jQuery UI VS JQWidgets

Compare jQuery UI VS JQWidgets and see what are their differences

Flagsmith

Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

jQuery UI

Curated set of user interface interactions, effects, widgets, and themes built on top of the jQuery JavaScript Library

JQWidgets

Unique toolkit for HTML5 Web development

Landing page //
2021-10-17

Landing page //
2022-05-01

jQuery UI

Website: jqueryui.com
Pricing URL: -
$ Details

Edit details

JQWidgets

Website: jqwidgets.com
Pricing URL: Official JQWidgets Pricing
$ Details: -

Edit details

jQuery UI features and specs

Ease of Use
jQuery UI simplifies creating and managing complex UI components with straightforward syntax and comprehensive documentation.
Compatibility
jQuery UI is highly compatible with older browsers, offering a broader range of support compared to more modern frameworks.
Extensibility
jQuery UI is designed to be modular and extendable, allowing developers to use only the components they need and easily extend or theming them.
Rich Set of Widgets
It comes with a variety of pre-built widgets such as datepickers, accordions, and sliders, which can save development time.
Animated Effects
jQuery UI includes many built-in animation effects that can enhance the user experience without requiring additional libraries.
Theming
The library provides Themeroller, a tool that allows developers to create custom themes easily, ensuring UI consistency and branding.

Possible disadvantages of jQuery UI

Performance
Due to its extensive feature set, jQuery UI can be relatively heavy, which may affect performance, particularly in resource-constrained environments.
Not Mobile-First
jQuery UI is not designed with mobile-first principles in mind, making it less optimal for modern responsive web applications.
Learning Curve
While easy to use for simple tasks, mastering jQuery UI for more complex applications may require a significant learning curve.
Dependency on jQuery
Since jQuery UI relies on the jQuery library, it adds an additional dependency which can be limiting if you prefer or are required to use vanilla JS or another library.
Declining Popularity
With the rise of modern frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular, jQuery UI has seen a decline in popularity and community support.
Limited Modern Features
Compared to contemporary UI libraries, jQuery UI lacks some of the modern features and performance optimizations found in newer libraries.

JQWidgets features and specs

Comprehensive Component Library
JQWidgets offers a wide range of UI components that are suitable for building complex web applications, providing developers with many options to create feature-rich applications.
Ease of Integration
The library integrates smoothly with popular frameworks such as Angular, React, and Vue, which helps developers seamlessly incorporate JQWidgets into existing projects.
Cross-Browser Compatibility
JQWidgets supports all major browsers, ensuring consistent functionality and appearance across different platforms and devices.
Detailed Documentation
The library comes with extensive documentation, tutorials, and examples, making it easier for developers to get started and understand various components.
Regular Updates
JQWidgets has frequent updates and feature additions, which helps developers stay up-to-date with the latest web development trends and technologies.

Possible disadvantages of JQWidgets

Licensing Cost
Some features and components of JQWidgets come under a commercial license, which might not be suitable for budget-conscious projects or individual developers.
Learning Curve
Despite its comprehensive documentation, developers new to JQWidgets might face a learning curve, especially if they are unfamiliar with more advanced UI components.
Overhead
Using a comprehensive UI library can sometimes lead to increased file sizes and loading times, which can be a concern for performance-sensitive applications.
Customization Complexity
While JQWidgets offers many features, customizing components beyond their default settings can sometimes be complex and might require deep dives into the library's internals.
Dependency Management
Integrating JQWidgets into a project can add additional dependencies that need to be managed, potentially complicating the build and deployment processes.

jQuery UI videos

+ Add

jQuery UI tutorial: Adding a user interface with jQuery UI | lynda.com

JQWidgets videos

+ Add

Tutorial: Angular CLI & jqwidgets-ng

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to jQuery UI and JQWidgets)

jQuery UI

JQWidgets

Javascript UI Libraries

91 91%

Javascript UI Libraries

9% 9

Development Tools

96 96%

Development Tools

4% 4

JavaScript Framework

70 70%

JavaScript Framework

30% 30

Libraries And Widgets

100 100%

Libraries And Widgets

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using jQuery UI and JQWidgets. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, jQuery UI seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 15 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

jQuery UI mentions (15)

Let Me Talk About Component-based Front-end Development
The once popular jQuery, with its strengths fully utilized in jQuery UI and Bootstrap, provides many UI components and is also friendly to backend developers, seemingly meeting the requirements. However, looking at their component implementation and resource loading forms—. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
100+ Must-Have Web Development Resources
jQuery UI: An open-source library for building user interfaces based on jQuery. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
What is a component library and should you build your own?
Fortunately, when I started web development in earnest, many of these issues were ironed out. By this point, there were still a handful of libraries that made writing complex interfaces with cross-browser support a little easier. Jquery UI, the first component library I used, supported accordions and other widgets. But the browser is constantly evolving, and we now have a native way of implementing this accordion... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
Best ReactJS library for Drag-n-Drop Table for plugin Admin view?
Because WordPress is already have these jQuery & jQuery UI libraries (https://jqueryui.com/). Source: almost 2 years ago
jQuery 3.6.2 Released
We still use jQuery + jQuery UI on our website because it is basically battle tested through 15+ years. https://jqueryui.com/ It is easy as hell. What's there to not like? I don't care to be called names or being old fashioned. I also don't care about "right" tooling for frontend. As far it works and it is robust and it is going to be around for many years, I am fine with it. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago