> Unlike emacs or vim or even nano, it didn't have a bunch of invisible shortcut keys, just a Windows-like drop-down menu system (but rendered in DOS). You might like "joe", which was inspired by WordStar: . - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

I actually have a bound set for WordStar 4. If you want to use something similar on modern systems, try "Joe's Own Editor." https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

JOE is pretty nice https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/ — a hybrid of WordStar and Emacs, and if you run it with `jstar` you get a pretty authentic WordStar experience which also reminds of the earliest Borland Turbo IDEs. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago

If you want to change your workflow, you might consider using a terminal based text editor though. There are many out there, the most famous being vi or emacs (though both a bit hard to use) and packages specifically for word processing exist as well (for example https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/). It will need more getting used to, but this will pretty much run on a potato and you could use a pi zero or any... Source: over 1 year ago

JOE [1] has worked this way as long as I remember (which is close to 20 years). [1] https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

> it supports my keystrokes You know that there is basically a standard set, imposed by Windows in about 1986 or something and also supported in GNOME 2, MATE, Xfce, LXDE, etc etc.? I am more interested in if it supports them. I mean, I don't know what your set are, and I am not for a moment saying there's anything wrong with them, but there are standards for this stuff, used heavily by millions of blind... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

I've been mostly using fzy which is written in C. I hope skim's matching algorithm is as good as fzy's…. Source: over 1 year ago

Am I the only one who prefers FZY ? https://github.com/jhawthorn/fzy. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

A while ago there was a post on this sub about a plugin called wilder.nvim which looks absolutely awesome. Wilder seems super configurable and it's README has a bunch of different suggested configurations. However, it is designed to work with both Vim and Neovim, but does have a config for Neovim, but it depends on kinda odd plugins like cpsm (which uses ctrlp.vim) as well as fzy. Source: almost 3 years ago