JJazzLab VS Icypeas

JJazzLab's answer

• You can start a solo slowly and gradually build up the atmosphere!
• Realistic, non-boring, and easily customizable backing tracks even for complex songs
• Free and open-source application with an extensible plugin-based architecture

Icypeas's answer:

Icypeas has an unparalleled capacity to verify catch-all emails. It allows you to reach out to untapped leads.

JJazzLab's answer

It's free, it's simple yet powerful and constantly evolving.

Icypeas's answer:

Icypeas is a good choice if you care about email discovery rate and bounce rate.

Honest drawbacks: - we are not an all-in-one platform like Apollo.io, which is a lead database, an enrichment tool and an outreach solution, whereas Icypeas focusses on enrichment only. - our response time (for an email search) is between 1 and 5 minutes. It is longer than all our competitors. This is true for single searches, not for bulk searches. When it comes to bulk searches, we are way faster than the competition (because we have a huge capacity to parallelize requests).

JJazzLab's answer

• Musicians who want to have fun practicing their instrument
• Music teachers
• Developers and researchers who need a platform to easily experiment new music algorithms

Icypeas's answer:

Salespeople in B2B SaaS companies and lead generation agencies.

JJazzLab's answer

As a jazz/funk pianist I have tried most of the auto-accompaniment or backing tracks apps (Band In a Box, etc). They are good indeed and I had some fun at first, but I quickly got frustrated: I missed the intensity dynamics which help develop interesting solos. I was aware that a program will never match a real band, but I had a few ideas how to do better. That’s why I decided to start developing JJazzLab.

JJazzLab's answer

Java, Apache Netbeans platform.

Icypeas's answer:

Node.js, Vue.js, Elasticsearch, MongoDB. We plan to replace Node with Rust soon.

JJazzLab's answer

• JJazzLab has more than 25000 individual users across the world