Jinja2 VS Haml

I have a list say list[a][b] of length 10.I want to print from list[0][b] to list[10][b] and use it in jinja2 template. Source: about 2 years ago

I am using Flask with Jinja2 as templating language. Source: about 2 years ago

I'm trying to issue a POST request within a Jinja template in Flask. However, parameters are passed in via GET by default, and this particular method only accepts POST requests. Source: about 2 years ago

For our application above, we defined the string "My flask app" within our Python code. This was okay, as it was a single line, but as our front-end code grows, it will be cumbersome to define everything in our Python file. Flask allows for separation of concerns though so-called "templates." These are usually .html files, with some Python logic mixed in through the Jinja template engine language. Let's add a... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

First of all, I like Slim. I like the beauty and cleanness of Slim templates, to me they are way more readable than regular ERB templates and I think they fit in the ruby/Rails ecosystem very well. Slim is a close cousin to Haml, without the ugly percent characters, haha. I've used Slim exclusively in my projects since about 2016. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

> I can't say what problem it is supposed to solve "Haml accelerates and simplifies template creation" https://haml.info/ If you'd rather write raw HTML, keeping track of closing tags etc, then don't use HAML. No need to bash it because you personally feel it is ugly or unnecessary. FWIW I personally feel the exact opposite. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

There is a better side by side of the syntax here https://haml.info (i've been using haml for 17 years lol, I find it more enjoyable to read and write). - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Personally, I'd recommend Maud if you don't need something with runtime reloading. Not only is it much faster, it implements a template language that is effectively the Rust-syntax equivalent to Slim or Haml using a procedural macro, so you get compile-time verification that your HTML output is well-formed. Source: about 1 year ago

Does this support HAML-style syntax? We're 100% HAML-only for templating, whether normal Rails views or ViewComponent... https://github.com/haml/haml so going back to writing HTML or ERB feels like a huge downgrade. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago