Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Jekyll VS Umbraco

Compare Jekyll VS Umbraco and see what are their differences

Jekyll logo Jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.

Umbraco logo Umbraco

Umbraco is the leading open source Microsoft ASP.NET CMS. You can start using Umbraco in 2 minutes, by taking a free trial of Umbraco Cloud.
  • Jekyll Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-17
  • Umbraco Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-22

Jekyll features and specs

  • Speed and Performance
    Jekyll generates static websites, which means they load faster compared to dynamic websites. No database queries are required, reducing server overhead and improving performance.
  • Security
    Static sites have a smaller attack surface compared to dynamic sites because they don't rely on databases or server-side code. This means fewer vectors for potential compromises.
  • Simplicity
    Jekyll setups are relatively straightforward, especially if you are comfortable writing in Markdown and HTML. This can make it easier to manage and maintain your website.
  • Integration with GitHub Pages
    Jekyll is designed to work seamlessly with GitHub Pages, allowing you to host your website for free with automatic deployment directly from your GitHub repository.
  • Customizability
    Jekyll allows for extensive customization through its support for plugins, themes, and templates. This can be helpful to create a unique look and functionality for your website.

Possible disadvantages of Jekyll

  • Learning Curve
    While Jekyll is simpler than some other static site generators, it does require some familiarity with the command line, version control (Git), and YAML configuration.
  • Build Time
    For large websites, the build times can become lengthy, which can slow down the development process, especially if you are making frequent updates.
  • Lack of Real-time Content Updates
    Since Jekyll generates static sites, real-time content updates (e.g., comments, dynamic forms) aren't natively supported and require third-party services or additional tooling.
  • Dependence on Ruby
    Jekyll is built with Ruby, so you will need to have Ruby installed and occasionally deal with Ruby-specific issues. This might be a drawback for developers who are not familiar with the Ruby ecosystem.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While Jekyll is very flexible, it doesn’t have built-in support for many features out of the box, which might require you to manually implement or rely on plugins.

Umbraco features and specs

  • Open Source
    Umbraco is an open-source platform, which means it is free to use and has a large community contributing to its continuous improvement and support.
  • User-Friendly
    The CMS has an intuitive and user-friendly interface, making it easy for non-technical users to manage content efficiently.
  • Highly Customizable
    Umbraco is highly flexible and customizable, allowing developers to create tailored solutions to fit specific business needs.
  • Extensive Documentation
    The platform offers extensive documentation and resources, including tutorials and forums, which can be very helpful for developers.
  • Strong Developer Community
    A robust community of developers and contributors provides valuable plugins, packages, and support, enhancing the platform's capabilities.
  • Scalability
    Umbraco is scalable, making it suitable for projects of all sizes—from small websites to large enterprise applications.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The CMS easily integrates with various third-party tools and services, expanding its functionality and adaptability.
  • SEO Friendly
    Umbraco provides multiple SEO tools and options to help improve search engine visibility and performance of your website.

Possible disadvantages of Umbraco

  • Learning Curve
    Although the interface is user-friendly, there can be a learning curve for those new to the CMS or less tech-savvy users.
  • Performance
    For very large and complex sites, performance optimization may require additional attention and expertise.
  • Cost for Advanced Features
    While basic usage is free, some advanced features or support plans may require additional fees, which can add to the overall cost.
  • Dependency on .NET
    Umbraco is built on the .NET framework, which could be a limitation if your development team is not familiar with .NET technologies.
  • Plugin Quality
    The quality of third-party plugins and packages can vary, and some may not be as well-maintained or compatible with the latest version of Umbraco.
  • Limited Out-of-the-box Features
    Compared to some other CMS platforms, Umbraco may offer fewer out-of-the-box features, potentially requiring more initial setup and configuration.
  • Hosting Requirements
    Due to its dependency on the .NET framework, hosting options may be more limited or specific, potentially increasing hosting costs.

Jekyll videos

Getting Started With Jekyll, The Static Site Generator

Umbraco videos

Wordpress Vs Umbraco

More videos:

  • Review - What is so good about Umbraco?
  • Review - ipso Educated | Umbraco vs. Wordpress - Media Library Comparison

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Jekyll and Umbraco)
CMS
83 83%
17% 17
Blogging
88 88%
12% 12
Blogging Platform
71 71%
29% 29
Static Site Generators
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Jekyll and Umbraco. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Jekyll and Umbraco

Jekyll Reviews

Best Gitbook Alternatives You Need to Try in 2023
Jekyll is a static site generator often used to create blogs and websites, similar to Gitbook in its ability to generate documentation from markdown files. Jekyll is built in Ruby and is known for its flexibility and ease of use. It also has a large community and a wide variety of plugins and themes available. Jekyll's main advantage is that it is highly customizable,...
Source: www.archbee.com
11 Popular Free And Open Source WordPress CMS alternatives in 2021
Unlike some listed alternatives, Jekyll is also a static site generator so it lays in the same category. It uses Ruby and we would say it's simpler, free, and open-source CMS software.
Source: medevel.com
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Jekyll isn’t strict with its content location. It expects pages in the root of your site, and will build whatever’s there. Here’s how you might organize these pages in your Jekyll site root:
9 Reasons I Think Craft is the Best CMS on the Market Today
Craft CMS is simple, minimalistic, agile and has every capability a modern CMS framework needs. Over the past ten years we have worked with every CMS you could think of (Wordpress, Drupal, Rails+ActiveAdmin, Ghost, Weebly, DjangoCMS, Jekyll, Joomla, Tumblr, Squarespace, Expression Engine, Statamic, Blogger)… here are the reasons why we’ve landed firmly with Craft as our №1...
Source: hackernoon.com

Umbraco Reviews

We have no reviews of Umbraco yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jekyll seems to be a lot more popular than Umbraco. While we know about 194 links to Jekyll, we've tracked only 6 mentions of Umbraco. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Jekyll mentions (194)

  • How to create a blog with Quartz, GitHub, and Cloudflare
    If you don't want to use Jekyll as your static site generator for GitHub Pages and you want to have a custom domain for your GitHub Pages. This post is for you! - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Blogging with Obsidian and Jekyll
    Jekyll is a static site generator that transforms Markdown files into a fully functional website. Everything is generated into plain HTML, which makes it simple to deploy on platforms like GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Create a Blogging Platform With No Backend (Zero Hosting Fee)
    Obviously, there are a dozen choices for generating static websites (efficiently and quickly), from the classic Jekyll to the new Next.js. And you are good to go with any of them as long as your confident with it. I choose 11ty because:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • It's easy to dev blog
    In your repository settings you need to turn on GitHub Pages to make it pull Jekyll content (that's the magic✨ default GitHub Pages build tool) from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • How to build a blog with NodeJS
    If you're looking to start a blog (or if you're thinking of redesigning yours although you haven't posted in 2 years), you'll stumble upon a lot of options and it can be incredibly daunting; and if you stumble with the newest Josh's post about his stack it is easy to feel overwhelmed with the shown stack. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
View more

Umbraco mentions (6)

  • Understanding Content Management Systems (CMS): A Comprehensive Guide
    Umbraco.com. (n.d.). Umbraco: The friendly CMS. Retrieved from https://umbraco.com/. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • CMS where you can use c#/ razor code directly in the cms
    As /u/transhumanist2000 said, the only other one I've seen that looked heavily supported and had a sizable following are dot net nuke, and I'd add, Umbraco (https://umbraco.com/). Unfortunately I haven't heard the best of feedback about these cmses. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What’s your favorite CMS?
    I really like Umbraco (https://umbraco.com/), It has a decent community, and is on DotNetCore these days makes it very easy to use. You can setup most basic things yourself, but since it exists as a satellite to your site. You can integrate with it as deeply or not as you want. Plus the workflow for defining content is nice, the customer-facing UI is also slick, and adding custom elements to it and extending is... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Why making Umbraco headless makes sense
    Because of this, the Umbraco HQ created the Umbraco Heartcore project that builds upon the existing Umbraco CMS by adding a headless integration in GraphQL. The only problem with this solution is the pricing. Because Umbraco CMS is open-source and free to use, you might see this product solution as a barrier to entry. It also makes it impossible to use your infrastructure to manage your CMS as they require the... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • WordPress plugin vulnerability opened up one million sites to remote takeover
    Umbraco is the one I was thinking of in terms of popularity and being free and open (the self hosted version at least, they have a paid for cloud solution as well). Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Jekyll and Umbraco, you can also consider the following products

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

Drupal - Drupal - the leading open-source CMS for ambitious digital experiences that reach your audience across multiple channels. Because we all have different needs, Drupal allows you to create a unique space in a world of cookie-cutter solutions.

Joomla - Joomla! is the mobile-ready and user-friendly way to build your website. Choose from thousands of features and designs. Joomla! is free and open source.

GatsbyJS - Blazing-fast static site generator for React