Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

JavaScript VS LiveScript

Compare JavaScript VS LiveScript and see what are their differences

JavaScript logo JavaScript

Lightweight, interpreted, object-oriented language with first-class functions

LiveScript logo LiveScript

LiveScript is a language which compiles down to JavaScript.
  • JavaScript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-05

We recommend LibHunt JavaScript for discovery and comparisons of trending JavaScript projects.

  • LiveScript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-23

JavaScript features and specs

  • Wide Browser Support
    JavaScript is supported by all modern web browsers without the need for any plugins, making it highly versatile for client-side scripting.
  • Asynchronous Programming
    JavaScript supports asynchronous programming with features like callbacks, Promises, and async/await, which helps in efficiently handling tasks such as HTTP requests.
  • Rich Ecosystem and Libraries
    The JavaScript ecosystem includes a vast amount of libraries and frameworks like React, Angular, Vue, and Node.js, which streamline development processes.
  • Community Support
    JavaScript has a large and active community, providing extensive resources, documentation, and forums for troubleshooting and development advice.
  • Event-Driven
    The language is inherently event-driven, making it suitable for developing interactive web applications that react to user inputs.
  • Full-Stack Development
    With the advent of Node.js, JavaScript can be used for both client-side and server-side development, enabling full-stack development using a single language.

Possible disadvantages of JavaScript

  • Security Issues
    Being an interpreted language that runs in the browser, JavaScript code is visible to the user, making it susceptible to security risks such as Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).
  • Browser Compatibility
    While JavaScript itself is widely supported, different browsers may implement JavaScript functions and standards differently, leading to compatibility issues.
  • Performance
    JavaScript is generally slower than compiled languages such as C++ or Java. Heavy computations can lead to performance bottlenecks.
  • Single Inheritance
    JavaScript uses prototypal inheritance instead of classical inheritance, which can be confusing for developers coming from object-oriented programming backgrounds.
  • Dynamic Typing
    JavaScript's dynamic typing can lead to runtime errors that are hard to debug, as variable types are checked at runtime rather than during compilation.
  • Fragmentation
    The ecosystem has many competing libraries, frameworks, and tools, which can make it overwhelming for developers to choose the right technologies for their projects.

LiveScript features and specs

  • Syntactic Sugar
    LiveScript offers a lot of syntactic sugar over JavaScript, making the code more concise and expressive. This includes cleaner function syntax, implicit returns, and significant whitespace, which can lead to faster development and more readable code.
  • Functional Programming
    LiveScript is designed with an emphasis on functional programming. It includes features like pattern matching, destructuring assignment, and first-class functions, which make it easier to write functional code compared to traditional JavaScript.
  • Compilation to JavaScript
    LiveScript compiles to JavaScript, which means it can be used anywhere JavaScript runs. This ensures compatibility with any JavaScript environment, including browsers and Node.js.
  • Extensive Built-in Functions
    The language includes a wide array of built-in higher-order functions which make operations like map, filter, and reduce easier to implement without needing to rely on external libraries.
  • Community and Ecosystem
    Benefiting from the JavaScript ecosystem, LiveScript has access to the vast array of JavaScript libraries and tools, making it versatile and largely adaptable to various projects.

Possible disadvantages of LiveScript

  • Small Community
    LiveScript has a smaller user base compared to other JavaScript transpilers like TypeScript or CoffeeScript, leading to fewer resources, less community support, and limited third-party integrations.
  • Learning Curve
    For developers used to traditional JavaScript, LiveScript’s unique syntax and functional programming style can pose a steep learning curve, requiring a shift in thinking and additional time to master.
  • Debugging Challenges
    Debugging LiveScript can be more challenging because developers often have to interpret the compiled JavaScript output rather than the original LiveScript code, which can be time-consuming and complex.
  • Lack of Type Safety
    Unlike TypeScript, LiveScript does not offer built-in static type checking, which can lead to runtime errors that might have been caught during a compile-time check in a language with stronger type support.
  • Adoption and Maintenance
    LiveScript is not as widely adopted as other languages that transpile to JavaScript, which raises concerns about its long-term maintenance and the potential for becoming obsolete if not actively maintained.

JavaScript videos

Learn JavaScript in 7 minutes | Create Interactive Websites | Code in 5

More videos:

  • Review - Top 10 JavaScript Interview Questions
  • Review - Learn JavaScript in 12 Minutes

LiveScript videos

No LiveScript videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JavaScript and LiveScript)
Programming Language
89 89%
11% 11
OOP
91 91%
9% 9
Generic Programming Language
Gaming
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using JavaScript and LiveScript. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare JavaScript and LiveScript

JavaScript Reviews

Top 10 Rust Alternatives
In simple words, the main goal of JavaScript is to develop web pages and is used for authentication procedures. Some of the pros of using JavaScript as an alternative to Rust are follows.
Top 15 jQuery Alternatives To Know
ExtJS, as the name suggests, stands for Extended JavaScript. As an offering from Sencha, it depends on YahooUserInterface. ExtJS helps in creating data intensified HTML5 apps with JavaScript. It consists of a huge collection of customizable and high-performance widgets that assist in creating cross-platform mobile and web apps, for any type of modernized device.
The 10 Best Programming Languages to Learn Today
JavaScript skills are always in high demand – most of the world's top websites and apps rely on JavaScript in one way or another. Plus, JavaScript is a great springboard for learning more complex programming languages.
Source: ict.gov.ge

LiveScript Reviews

We have no reviews of LiveScript yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, LiveScript seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JavaScript mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JavaScript yet. Tracking of JavaScript recommendations started around Mar 2021.

LiveScript mentions (8)

  • Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored
    That's an interesting idea. Just to mention though: LiveScript is a really great language that compiles to JavaScript. https://livescript.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Oracle justified its JavaScript trademark with Node.js–now it wants that ignored
    It was a better name for JavaScript. It is a better name for another project that is better named than JavaScript and owns the name LiveScript now. https://livescript.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Civet: A Superset of TypeScript
    I know this hasn't been updated, and I know it's a fork of CoffeeScript, but https://livescript.net/ has had a lot of the "magic" syntax here for quite a while. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Netscape and Sun announce JavaScript (1995)
    Fun fact: LiveScript is a FP-oriented language which compiles to JavaScript. It's been around for a while now :-) https://livescript.net/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Dear Oracle, Please Release the JavaScript Trademark
    Too late. The name was taken when it was free. https://livescript.net/ (But seems inactive judging by GitHub). Actually a mostly quite nice little toy language. (Only the OOP part seems messed up a little bit; but besides that it looks quite clean). - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JavaScript and LiveScript, you can also consider the following products

Python - Python is a clear and powerful object-oriented programming language, comparable to Perl, Ruby, Scheme, or Java.

CoffeeScript - Unfancy JavaScript

Java - A concurrent, class-based, object-oriented, language specifically designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible

Typescript - TypeScript allows developers to compile a superset of JavaScript to plain JavaScript on any browser, host, or operating system.

Rust - A safe, concurrent, practical language

Kotlin - Statically typed Programming Language targeting JVM and JavaScript