Iterate VS Apache Camel

Iterate Reviews

1. breakthrough-tom    

   Growth Marketing at Breakthrough | almost 3 years ago
   Quick way to Gather User Information

   I love working with Iterate because it eliminates the need for bulky 50 question user surveys, live in person focus groups (was lovely during covid when this couldn't happen at all), and sifting through Google Analytics data for 'trends' to answer questions.

   We use Iterate because we're constantly testing new features on our site, landing pages with media spend, and messaging tactics. Iterate provides a single script to drop into your source code and then you can create custom branded surveys that keep the user on your site. We've been able to increase conversion rates, launch new products/services and get event/registration hesitation feedback in days/weeks instead of trying to decipher was directional data tells us.

   🏁 Competitors: Survey Monkey, Qualtrics

   👍 Pros:    Easy to track data|Guest satisfaction survey|User friendly interface|Embeddable feedback widget

   👎 Cons:    Can't use survey buttons to create second step on website

Apache Camel Reviews

Iterate mentions (1)

• User survey feedback api for flutter.

  For example, there is this product , but it does not support flutter. Source: about 3 years ago

Apache Camel mentions (12)

• Ask HN: What is the correct way to deal with pipelines?

  "correct" is a value judgement that depends on lots of different things. Only you can decide which tool is correct. Here are some ideas: - https://camel.apache.org/ - https://www.windmill.dev/ Your idea about a queue (in redis, or postgres, or sqlite, etc) is also totally valid. These off-the-shelf tools I listed probably wouldn't give you a huge advantage IMO. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

• Why messaging is much better than REST for inter-microservice communications

  This reminds me more of Apache Camel[0] than other things it's being compared to. > The process initiator puts a message on a queue, and another processor picks that up (probably on a different service, on a different host, and in different code base) - does some processing, and puts its (intermediate) result on another queue This is almost exactly the definition of message routing (ie: Camel). I'm a bit doubtful... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• Can I continuously write to a CSV file with a python script while a Java application is continuously reading from it?

  Since you're writing a Java app to consume this, I highly recommend Apache Camel to do the consuming of messages for it. You can trivially aim it at file systems, message queues, databases, web services and all manner of other sources to grab your data for you, and you can change your mind about what that source is, without having to rewrite most of your client code. Source: over 1 year ago

• S3 to S3 transform

  For a simple sequential Pipeline, my goto would be Apache Camel. As soon as you want complexity its either Apache Nifi or a micro service architecture. Source: over 1 year ago

• 🗞️ We have just released our JBang! catalog 🛍️

  🐪 Apache Camel : Camel JBang, A JBang-based Camel app for easily running Camel routes. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago