Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Iron.io VS RabbitMQ

Compare Iron.io VS RabbitMQ and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Iron.io logo Iron.io

Iron.io is the leader in cloud application services. IronMQ is a highly available message queue solution and IronWorker is a powerful async task processing service.

RabbitMQ logo RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.
  • Iron.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-12
  • RabbitMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Iron.io features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

RabbitMQ features and specs

  • Reliability
    RabbitMQ ensures message durability by persisting messages to disk. This enhances reliability, especially for critical applications where message loss is unacceptable.
  • Flexibility
    RabbitMQ supports multiple messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, and STOMP, allowing diverse applications to communicate seamlessly.
  • Advanced Features
    RabbitMQ offers rich features such as message routing, delivery acknowledgments, and clustering, which can satisfy complex messaging needs.
  • Ease of Use
    RabbitMQ provides extensive documentation and user-friendly management tools, making it accessible for developers and administrators.
  • Scalability
    Its clustering and federated queues capabilities allow RabbitMQ to scale both vertically and horizontally to handle increased loads.
  • Transaction Support
    RabbitMQ provides support for transactions, ensuring that a series of operations can be executed atomically, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity.

Possible disadvantages of RabbitMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and configuring RabbitMQ can be complex, especially for users who are unfamiliar with messaging brokers or have limited experience with it.
  • Overhead
    RabbitMQ can introduce overhead in terms of latency and resource consumption, which might be an issue for high-performance applications requiring low latency.
  • Maintenance
    Maintaining RabbitMQ, including tasks such as monitoring, managing clusters, and handling updates, requires ongoing effort and expertise.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its feature-rich nature and various configurations, there can be a steep learning curve for new users to master RabbitMQ.
  • Performance Issues with High Volume
    In extremely high-volume scenarios, RabbitMQ may experience performance bottlenecks and memory issues, requiring careful tuning and scaling strategies.
  • Security Considerations
    Proper security configuration, including user roles, permissions, and encryption, is essential but can be complex and critical for preventing unauthorized access.

Analysis of RabbitMQ

Overall verdict

  • Yes, RabbitMQ is a good choice for most message brokering needs, especially when the requirements include high reliability, ease of integration, and support for complex messaging patterns. Its wide adoption in the industry and active community support make it a trusted solution.

Why this product is good

  • RabbitMQ is a robust message broker that supports multiple messaging protocols, making it highly versatile for various applications. It is known for its reliability, scalability, and ease of use. RabbitMQ provides strong support for clustering and is highly available, ensuring that messages are reliably delivered even in case of node failures. Additionally, it has a rich ecosystem with a plethora of plugins and integrations with other software, making it a flexible choice for different use cases.

Recommended for

    RabbitMQ is recommended for businesses and developers who need a reliable message broker for microservices architecture, asynchronous processing, or distributed systems. It is well-suited for both small-scale projects that need easy setup and enterprise-level applications that demand high throughput and low latency.

Iron.io videos

No Iron.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

RabbitMQ videos

+ Add

數據工程 | 快速review | 如何架設Docker Swarm + RabbitMQ？？

More videos:

  • Review - What's New in RabbitMQ—June 2012 Edition
  • Review - Feature complete: Uncovering the true cost different RabbitMQ features and configs - Jack Vanlightly

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Iron.io and RabbitMQ)

Iron.io

RabbitMQ

Data Integration
8 8%
Data Integration
92% 92
Stream Processing
10 10%
Stream Processing
90% 90
Web Service Automation
6 6%
Web Service Automation
94% 94
DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Iron.io and RabbitMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Iron.io and RabbitMQ

Iron.io Reviews

Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
Korak Bhaduri, Director of Operations at Iron.io, has been on a continuous journey exploring the nuances of serverless solutions. With varied experiences from startups to research and a foundation in management and engineering, Korak brings a thoughtful and balanced perspective to the Iron.io blog.
Source: blog.iron.io

RabbitMQ Reviews

Best message queue for cloud-native apps
RabbitMQ is an open-source message broker software that allows applications to communicate with each other using a messaging protocol. It was developed by Rabbit Technologies and first released in 2007, which was later acquired by VMware.RabbitMQ is based on the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol (AMQP) and provides a reliable, scalable, and interoperable messaging system.
Source: docs.vanus.ai
Are Free, Open-Source Message Queues Right For You?
However, it's important to note that every tool has its strengths and use cases. For instance, Kafka's strength lies in real-time data streaming, NATS shines with its simplicity, and RabbitMQ provides support for complex routing. In contrast, IronMQ provides an excellent balance of simplicity, durability, scalability, and ease of management, making it a powerful choice for...
Source: blog.iron.io
NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
RabbitMQ follows a standard store-and-forward pattern, allowing messages to be stored in RAM, on disk, or both. To ensure the persistence of messages, the producer can tag them as persistent, and they will be stored in a separate queue. This helps achieve message retention even after a restart or failure of the RabbitMQ server.
Source: gcore.com
6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
Due to RabbitMQ’s lightweight design, it can be easily deployed on public and private clouds. RabbitMQ is backed not only by a robust support system but also offers a great developer community. Since it is open-source software it is one of the best Kafka Alternatives and RabbitMQ is free of cost.
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
In this article, we will discuss an overview on RabbitMQ Alternatives. RabbitMQ has a flexible messaging system and functions as a multipurpose broker. But it often stops working, because of its high latency and very slow while doing so. The deployment & management of RabbitMQ is a too dull procedure. It can not be installed as modules, it can be installed only on machines...
Source: gokicker.com

Social recommendations and mentions

RabbitMQ might be a bit more popular than Iron.io. We know about 1 link to it since March 2021 and only 1 link to Iron.io. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Iron.io mentions (1)

  • Tron deposit
    The ledger Tron proxy is not working so you will have your money but the ledger live can't see it. I'm not sure if anyone has logged a ticket, but I do believe if you go into developer options in ledger live you can make it connect directly to iron.io and that will resolve it. Only works on desktop though. I'm also getting some other errors randomly so perhaps there are some bigger issues. Anyway, I'd suggest... Source: about 4 years ago

RabbitMQ mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Iron.io and RabbitMQ, you can also consider the following products

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

AWS Lambda - Automatic, event-driven compute service

Amazon SQS - Amazon Simple Queue Service is a fully managed message queuing service.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.

IronMQ - IronMQ is the distributed systems together by providing a reliable way to communicate between services and components.

Loading...