Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

iperf VS Vaping

Compare iperf VS Vaping and see what are their differences

iperf logo iperf

A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

Vaping logo Vaping

Vaping is a healthy alternative to smokeping!
  • iperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17
  • Vaping Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-22

iperf features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    iperf is compatible with a variety of operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it a versatile tool for network performance testing across different environments.
  • Comprehensive Performance Metrics
    Provides detailed metrics such as bandwidth, jitter, and packet loss, which are essential for in-depth network analysis and troubleshooting.
  • Client-Server Model
    Utilizes a client-server model that allows for measuring the maximum TCP and UDP bandwidth between two endpoints, making it suitable for both local and remote testing.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, iperf allows users to review, modify, and contribute to the codebase, ensuring transparency and fostering community involvement.
  • Customizable Test Parameters
    Allows users to customize tests with various parameters such as port number, buffer size, and test duration, offering flexibility to perform targeted network evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of iperf

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The command-line interface and numerous parameters might be overwhelming for beginners who are not familiar with network testing tools.
  • Limited Graphical Interface
    While powerful in functionality, iperf lacks a native graphical user interface, which could be a disadvantage for users who prefer visual tools over command-line utilities.
  • Resource Consumption
    iperf can consume substantial network resources and CPU power during testing, potentially affecting other applications running on the same network or device.
  • Manual Deployment Required
    Users need to manually deploy iperf on both client and server machines, which may be cumbersome for those looking for out-of-the-box network testing solutions.
  • Security Considerations
    Running iperf in server mode might expose a system to network attacks if not secured properly, necessitating careful consideration of security measures.

Vaping features and specs

  • Easy Installation
    Vaping is designed to have a simple installation process, facilitated by its presence on GitHub, which makes it accessible for users familiar with Python and open-source projects.
  • Extensible
    The tool supports plugins which allows users to extend its core functionality to suit their specific needs in network monitoring and performance testing.
  • Active Community
    As an open-source project on GitHub, Vaping can benefit from community support, where users can collaborate, contribute, and share solutions and improvements.
  • Customizable
    Vaping provides significant flexibility in terms of configuration options, allowing users to tailor its operation to their specific network monitoring requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Vaping

  • Technical Knowledge Required
    Users may need a certain level of technical expertise in Python and network administration to effectively implement and utilize Vaping.
  • Limited Documentation
    Documentation may not be as comprehensive as commercially supported software, potentially leading to challenges in understanding and maximizing all of Vaping’s capabilities.
  • Maintenance Responsibility
    Being an open-source tool, the maintenance and update of the software fall under the responsibility of the user or community, which might not be ideal for all users.
  • Scalability Concerns
    While customizable, the tool may face scalability issues when deployed in very large or complex network environments without adequate customization or resources.

iperf videos

Using Iperf to measure network speed / bandwidth

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use iperf to test local network LAN speed in Windows 10
  • Review - [HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Vaping videos

No Vaping videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to iperf and Vaping)
Monitoring Tools
87 87%
13% 13
Log Management
100 100%
0% 0
OS & Utilities
0 0%
100% 100
Network & Admin
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using iperf and Vaping. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

iperf might be a bit more popular than Vaping. We know about 4 links to it since March 2021 and only 3 links to Vaping. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

iperf mentions (4)

  • Microsoft: Don't Use Iperf3 on Windows
    Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Yet Another Bench Script (YABS): evaluate Linux server performance with this simple Bash script and utility
    Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Speed testing Visible with a modem
    File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: about 3 years ago
  • FTP upload speed isn't great
    I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: almost 4 years ago

Vaping mentions (3)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing iperf and Vaping, you can also consider the following products

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

SmokePing - Smokeping is a tool for measuring latency.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

PingPlotter - PingPlotter is a troubleshooting tool that helps IT professionals and neophytes identify, diagnose, and resolve network issues.

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

Pingnoo - Pingnoo is an open-source Windows, macOS and Linux visual trace route analyser.