Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

iperf VS PingInfoView

Compare iperf VS PingInfoView and see what are their differences

iperf logo iperf

A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

PingInfoView logo PingInfoView

PingInfoView is a small utility that allows you to easily ping multiple host names and IP addresses, and watch the result in one table.
  • iperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17
  • PingInfoView Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-25

iperf features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    iperf is compatible with a variety of operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it a versatile tool for network performance testing across different environments.
  • Comprehensive Performance Metrics
    Provides detailed metrics such as bandwidth, jitter, and packet loss, which are essential for in-depth network analysis and troubleshooting.
  • Client-Server Model
    Utilizes a client-server model that allows for measuring the maximum TCP and UDP bandwidth between two endpoints, making it suitable for both local and remote testing.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, iperf allows users to review, modify, and contribute to the codebase, ensuring transparency and fostering community involvement.
  • Customizable Test Parameters
    Allows users to customize tests with various parameters such as port number, buffer size, and test duration, offering flexibility to perform targeted network evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of iperf

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The command-line interface and numerous parameters might be overwhelming for beginners who are not familiar with network testing tools.
  • Limited Graphical Interface
    While powerful in functionality, iperf lacks a native graphical user interface, which could be a disadvantage for users who prefer visual tools over command-line utilities.
  • Resource Consumption
    iperf can consume substantial network resources and CPU power during testing, potentially affecting other applications running on the same network or device.
  • Manual Deployment Required
    Users need to manually deploy iperf on both client and server machines, which may be cumbersome for those looking for out-of-the-box network testing solutions.
  • Security Considerations
    Running iperf in server mode might expose a system to network attacks if not secured properly, necessitating careful consideration of security measures.

PingInfoView features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    PingInfoView features a simple and intuitive interface, making it easy for users to add and manage multiple hosts without complicating the process.
  • Portable Application
    The software is portable and doesn't require installation, making it convenient to run from any location, such as a USB drive.
  • Detailed Reports
    It provides comprehensive information such as ping round-trip time, success count, and failure percentage, helping users analyze connectivity effectively.
  • Free to Use
    PingInfoView is free, allowing users to access all its features without any cost, making it a budget-friendly option for network monitoring.
  • Customizable Frequency
    Users can customize the ping frequency, allowing for flexibility in monitoring different networks or hosts depending on their needs.

Possible disadvantages of PingInfoView

  • Basic Features
    The tool provides basic ping functionality without advanced features like graphs or historical data analysis seen in more comprehensive network management tools.
  • Limited Support
    There's limited technical support or community engagement compared to more popular network monitoring solutions, which might be an issue for users needing assistance.
  • Windows Only
    PingInfoView is only available for Windows, which restricts users on other operating systems from using this tool without running a virtual machine or similar solution.
  • No Real-Time Alerts
    The application does not offer real-time alerts or notifications, which can be a disadvantage for users monitoring critical network infrastructure needing immediate response.
  • Manual Configuration
    Adding hosts and setting preferences requires manual configuration, which may become cumbersome for users looking for automation capabilities within network monitoring tools.

iperf videos

Using Iperf to measure network speed / bandwidth

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use iperf to test local network LAN speed in Windows 10
  • Review - [HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

PingInfoView videos

شرح برنامج PingInfoView وطريقة العمل عليه والاستفاده من البرنامج

More videos:

  • Review - pinginfoview - Network Scanning Tool for Windows OS

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to iperf and PingInfoView)
Monitoring Tools
64 64%
36% 36
Log Management
82 82%
18% 18
OS & Utilities
0 0%
100% 100
Network & Admin
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using iperf and PingInfoView. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, iperf seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

iperf mentions (4)

  • Microsoft: Don't Use Iperf3 on Windows
    Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Yet Another Bench Script (YABS): evaluate Linux server performance with this simple Bash script and utility
    Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Speed testing Visible with a modem
    File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: about 3 years ago
  • FTP upload speed isn't great
    I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: almost 4 years ago

PingInfoView mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PingInfoView yet. Tracking of PingInfoView recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing iperf and PingInfoView, you can also consider the following products

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

Ping Meter Gadget - Customizable, graphical, semi-transparent ping (latency) meter.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

Fping (open source) - fping is a program to send ICMP echo probes to network hosts, similar to ping, but much better performing when pinging multiple hosts.

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

Multiping - Get MultiPing Support. Network monitoring in 60 seconds. MultiPing provides a graphical view of network performance, monitors hundreds of targets, and sends automatic alerts..