Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

iperf VS Open Visual Traceroute

Compare iperf VS Open Visual Traceroute and see what are their differences

iperf logo iperf

A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

Open Visual Traceroute logo Open Visual Traceroute

Open source cross-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac) Java Visual Traceroute, packet sniffer and Whois.
  • iperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17
  • Open Visual Traceroute Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-22

iperf features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    iperf is compatible with a variety of operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS, making it a versatile tool for network performance testing across different environments.
  • Comprehensive Performance Metrics
    Provides detailed metrics such as bandwidth, jitter, and packet loss, which are essential for in-depth network analysis and troubleshooting.
  • Client-Server Model
    Utilizes a client-server model that allows for measuring the maximum TCP and UDP bandwidth between two endpoints, making it suitable for both local and remote testing.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, iperf allows users to review, modify, and contribute to the codebase, ensuring transparency and fostering community involvement.
  • Customizable Test Parameters
    Allows users to customize tests with various parameters such as port number, buffer size, and test duration, offering flexibility to perform targeted network evaluations.

Possible disadvantages of iperf

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The command-line interface and numerous parameters might be overwhelming for beginners who are not familiar with network testing tools.
  • Limited Graphical Interface
    While powerful in functionality, iperf lacks a native graphical user interface, which could be a disadvantage for users who prefer visual tools over command-line utilities.
  • Resource Consumption
    iperf can consume substantial network resources and CPU power during testing, potentially affecting other applications running on the same network or device.
  • Manual Deployment Required
    Users need to manually deploy iperf on both client and server machines, which may be cumbersome for those looking for out-of-the-box network testing solutions.
  • Security Considerations
    Running iperf in server mode might expose a system to network attacks if not secured properly, necessitating careful consideration of security measures.

Open Visual Traceroute features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Open Visual Traceroute provides a graphical user interface, making it easier for users to visualize network paths compared to traditional command-line traceroute tools.
  • Visualization Capabilities
    The tool offers visual mapping of network paths on a world map, which helps users understand the geographic path and performance of network connections quickly and intuitively.
  • Platform Support
    It is compatible with major operating systems like Windows, MacOS, and Linux, offering flexibility and accessibility to a wide range of users.
  • Open Source
    Being open source allows users to contribute to its development, customize it to fit their needs, and audit the code for security concerns.

Possible disadvantages of Open Visual Traceroute

  • Performance Limitations
    As a graphically intensive application, it may consume more system resources compared to traditional traceroute tools, possibly impacting performance on lower-end systems.
  • Learning Curve
    While it is user-friendly, new users still might need some time to understand the various settings and interpretations of network data visualizations.
  • Dependency on Java
    The application requires Java to run, which might be seen as a disadvantage for users who prefer not to install additional software or manage Java dependencies.
  • Potential Inaccuracy
    IP geolocation is not always precise, which can result in inaccurate visual mapping of the network paths.

iperf videos

Using Iperf to measure network speed / bandwidth

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use iperf to test local network LAN speed in Windows 10
  • Review - [HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Open Visual Traceroute videos

Open visual traceroute

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to iperf and Open Visual Traceroute)
Monitoring Tools
86 86%
14% 14
Log Management
89 89%
11% 11
OS & Utilities
0 0%
100% 100
Network & Admin
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using iperf and Open Visual Traceroute. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, iperf seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

iperf mentions (4)

  • Microsoft: Don't Use Iperf3 on Windows
    Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Yet Another Bench Script (YABS): evaluate Linux server performance with this simple Bash script and utility
    Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Speed testing Visible with a modem
    File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: about 3 years ago
  • FTP upload speed isn't great
    I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: almost 4 years ago

Open Visual Traceroute mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Open Visual Traceroute yet. Tracking of Open Visual Traceroute recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing iperf and Open Visual Traceroute, you can also consider the following products

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

SmokePing - Smokeping is a tool for measuring latency.

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

Pingnoo - Pingnoo is an open-source Windows, macOS and Linux visual trace route analyser.

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

PingPlotter - PingPlotter is a troubleshooting tool that helps IT professionals and neophytes identify, diagnose, and resolve network issues.