Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Make.com VS react-testing-library

Compare Make.com VS react-testing-library and see what are their differences

Flagsmith
Flagsmith lets you manage feature flags and remote config across web, mobile and server side applications. Deliver true Continuous Integration. Get builds out faster. Control who has access to new features. We're Open Source. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Make.com logo Make.com

Tool for workflow automation (Former Integromat)

react-testing-library logo react-testing-library

[`React Testing Library`][gh] builds on top of `DOM Testing Library` by adding
  • Make.com Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-05
  • react-testing-library Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-08-21

Make.com features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Make.com offers a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible for non-technical users.
  • Integration Options
    The platform supports a wide array of integrations with popular apps and services, enabling complex workflows.
  • Custom Workflows
    Users can create highly customized workflows tailored to specific business needs, allowing for greater flexibility.
  • Scalability
    Make.com is built to handle both small-scale and enterprise-level tasks, providing a scalable solution as your business grows.
  • Community and Support
    There is an active community and comprehensive support, including documentation and forums, to help users troubleshoot and optimize their usage.
  • Real-time Monitoring and Analytics
    The platform offers real-time monitoring and analytics, allowing users to track the performance of their workflows and make data-driven decisions.
  • Versatile Triggers and Actions
    Make.com offers a variety of triggers and actions that can be used to automate a wide range of tasks across different services.

Possible disadvantages of Make.com

  • Pricing
    The pricing structure can be expensive for small businesses or individual users, especially for advanced features and high-volume usage.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, there is still a learning curve for newcomers to understand all the capabilities and features.
  • Occasional Bugs
    Users have reported occasional bugs and issues, which can disrupt workflows and require troubleshooting.
  • Limited Offline Support
    Make.com heavily relies on internet connectivity, which can be a drawback for users requiring offline functionality.
  • Complexity for Advanced Features
    While basic workflows are easy to set up, leveraging more advanced features may require a deeper understanding of the platform and potentially some coding knowledge.
  • Dependency on Third-party Services
    The platform’s effectiveness is influenced by the reliability and performance of third-party services it integrates with, making it susceptible to external issues.
  • Data Privacy Concerns
    Storing and processing data through third-party services may raise privacy and compliance issues for businesses dealing with sensitive information.

react-testing-library features and specs

  • Focused on user-centric testing
    React Testing Library encourages tests that closely resemble how users interact with an application. This approach makes tests more reliable and meaningful.
  • Reduces coupling to implementation details
    By encouraging developers to interact with components via the DOM, the library minimizes dependencies on component internals, making tests less prone to breaking from refactors.
  • Improved test readability
    Tests written with React Testing Library are generally easier to read and understand because they focus on what the user sees and does, rather than the internal logic of the components.
  • Comprehensive query options
    The library provides a wide range of query methods (e.g., getByText, getByRole), which makes it easy to select elements in ways that resemble how users think.
  • Active community and well-maintained
    React Testing Library has a strong, active community and it's maintained by experienced developers who keep the library up-to-date with React's evolution.

Possible disadvantages of react-testing-library

  • Limited support for non-DOM testing
    The library is heavily focused on DOM interactions, making it less suited for testing non-DOM logic or scenarios that don't involve user interactions.
  • Can be slower
    Tests that involve the DOM can be slower compared to tests that interact directly with component methods and state, which can lead to longer test execution times.
  • Learning curve for traditional testers
    Developers who are used to testing implementation details with other tools (like Enzyme) might find it challenging to adjust to the user-centric approach advocated by React Testing Library.
  • Potential for less granular control
    Because the library encourages testing through the UI, developers might find it harder to test specific, isolated internal behaviors of components that aren't directly visible to users.
  • Dependencies on browser APIs
    The library's reliance on browser APIs means that tests may behave differently in different environments or may require polyfills for certain features, leading to potential inconsistencies.

Analysis of Make.com

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Make.com is considered a good platform for those looking to streamline processes and improve efficiency through automation. Its flexible and powerful features cater to a wide range of needs, although there may be a learning curve for those new to automation or with limited technical knowledge.

Why this product is good

  • Make.com, formerly known as Integromat, is a popular platform for automating workflows and integrating various software tools. It offers a visual interface that allows users to connect different applications and automate repetitive tasks, enhancing productivity. Its ability to create complex multi-step automations with various conditions and triggers makes it a robust tool for both small businesses and larger enterprises.

Recommended for

  • small business owners
  • project managers
  • IT professionals
  • digital marketers
  • anyone looking to automate tasks without extensive coding knowledge

Analysis of react-testing-library

Overall verdict

  • React Testing Library is highly regarded in the React community for its simplicity and effective approach to testing React components. It’s known for promoting good testing practices that result in reliable and maintainable code.

Why this product is good

  • React Testing Library is considered good because it encourages testing practices that closely resemble how users interact with the application. It emphasizes testing components from the user's perspective and discourages testing implementation details, which can lead to more robust and maintainable tests.

Recommended for

  • Developers looking to improve the reliability of their React applications
  • Teams interested in adopting user-centric testing methodologies
  • Projects that prioritize maintainable and understandable test code

Make.com videos

+ Add

Zapier vs Integromat - Quick Comparison Review

More videos:

  • Review - Integromat feature tour
  • Review - Introduction to Integromat

react-testing-library videos

+ Add

React unit testing with Jest & React-testing-library

More videos:

  • Review - Test a React Component that renders a list with react-testing-library

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Make.com and react-testing-library)

Make.com

react-testing-library

Automation
100 100%
Automation
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Web Service Automation
100 100%
Web Service Automation
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Make.com and react-testing-library. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Make.com and react-testing-library

Make.com Reviews

The Best n8n.io Alternatives for Workflow Automation in 2025
Make, formerly known as Integromat, is a versatile no-code platform that enables users to create sophisticated workflows with ease. It offers a visual workflow builder that allows users to connect various applications and services, define conditional logic, and manipulate data without writing any code. Make's strengths lie in its ability to handle complex workflows and its...
Source: latenode.com
N8n.io Alternatives
One of the standout features of Integromat is its flexibility and customization options. Users can set up multi-step workflows with conditional logic, ensuring that each automation is tailored to their specific needs. Additionally, Integromat offers advanced error handling and data manipulation capabilities, providing robust solutions for complex automation requirements. For...
Source: apix-drive.com
The Best MuleSoft Alternatives [2024]
Make (formerly Integromat) is an integration solution that allows you to automate and connect applications, databases, web services, chatbots, and other systems.
Source: exalate.com
Top 9 MuleSoft Alternatives & Competitors in 2024
Make, one of the best Mulesoft alternatives, the ultimate IT process automation tool for enhancing efficiency, productivity, and collaboration. By automating routine tasks, integrating with existing infrastructure, and offering powerful workflow automation, Make empowers your team to streamline processes and achieve remarkable results.
Source: www.zluri.com
Zapier vs. Make.com: Which Automation Tool Will Take the Business Lead?
Make.com offers a cost-effective option for those looking for a business process automation solution, even if it may compromise usability and integration. From your scenario, Make.com seems like a realistic alternative for those with a more limited budget or those willing to work with additional API documentation and webhooks instead of the broader integration that Zapier...
Source: www.listproductsreview.com

react-testing-library Reviews

We have no reviews of react-testing-library yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, react-testing-library seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 133 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Make.com mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Make.com yet. Tracking of Make.com recommendations started around Mar 2021.

react-testing-library mentions (133)

  • Migrating from AngularJS to React
    Additionally, I wrote Jest and Enzyme unit tests to demonstrate how to go about unit testing the components, as test driven development (TDD) is another methodology my organization subscribes to. Jest is a unit testing framework that actually shipped with React if you use the Create React App CLI to make a new React project. And at the time, Enzyme was created by Airbnb and added additional functionality to Jest... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How To Convert HTML CSS JS To React JS
    After converting your components, take some time to test your application. Make sure everything is working as expected. React’s development server automatically reloads your application whenever you save changes, which makes testing a lot easier. Tools like Jest and React Testing Library are also available to help you write tests for your components. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How To Write Unit Test Cases In React JS
    React Testing Library: For testing React components from a user’s point of view, visit the React Testing Library documentation. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Top 20 Modern React Libraries To Supercharge Your Next Big Project
    Resource: React Testing Library Documentation. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Next.js Testing Guide: Unit and E2E Tests with Vitest & Playwright
    In this article, you will write unit tests in Next.js client components and synchronous server components using Vitest and React Testing Library, and you will write end-to-end tests for your async server components using Playwright. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Make.com and react-testing-library, you can also consider the following products

Zapier - Connect the apps you use everyday to automate your work and be more productive. 1000+ apps and easy integrations - get started in minutes.

Jest - Jest is a delightful JavaScript Testing Framework with a focus on simplicity.

ifttt - IFTTT puts the internet to work for you. Create simple connections between the products you use every day.

Storybook - Storybook is an open source tool for developing UI components in isolation for React, Vue, and Angular. It makes building stunning UIs organized and efficient.

n8n.io - Free and open fair-code licensed node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks across different services.

Vitest - A blazing fast unit test framework powered by Vite

Loading...