InstallBuilder VS PyInstaller

If you want an easy way to create installers for both Linux, Mac and Windows there is https://installbuilder.com/. Source: almost 2 years ago

We use InstallBuilder because the works for both Linux, Windows and Mac. Haven't tried others so don't know how it compares in terms of ease of use, features etc. Source: over 2 years ago

Normally games made with pygame are not playable from the web. They can only be run from the command line or use PyInstaller or cx_Freeze to create a standalone executable. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

I have found PyInstaller [1] to work well for packaging everything into a single ZIP file that unzips to a folder with an executable binary and all accompanying files (or even a single EXE file that self-extracts when run, but that increases startup time). It knows how to package PyQt and its associated Qt libraries (or PySide, which I actually prefer) so that they can be shipped with your application. [1... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

PyInstaller is the main way to build a Python executable. I'd recommenced bundling your program in the default one-folder mode and uploading it to Itch. Source: about 1 year ago

There are tools, not from Python Software Foundation (or officially supported by them), such as Pyinstaller, that will try to produce a single executable file that you can distribute for people to install. Of course, this would depend on the controls on the end user devices allowing such an installation. There can be some compatibility challenges, but if you are using reasonably standard Python it shall probably... Source: about 1 year ago

And to deploy your program you can use one of the programs that will compile your Python code in to an executable such as PyInstaller or Nuitka. Source: about 1 year ago