Software Alternatives & Reviews

Inngest VS Resque

Compare Inngest VS Resque and see what are their differences

Inngest logo Inngest

Application and Data, Application Hosting, and Serverless / Task Processing

Resque logo Resque

Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.
  • Inngest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • Resque Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-04

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Inngest and Resque)
Application Hosting
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Serverless / Task Processing
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Inngest and Resque. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Resque seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Inngest mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Inngest yet. Tracking of Inngest recommendations started around Apr 2023.

Resque mentions (5)

  • Add web scraping data into the database at regular intervals [ruby & ror]
    You can use a background job queue like Resque to scrape and process data in the background, and a scheduler like resque-scheduler to schedule jobs to run your scraper periodically. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to run a really long task from a Rails web request
    So how do we trigger such a long-running process from a Rails request? The first option that comes to mind is a background job run by some of the queuing back-ends such as Sidekiq, Resque or DelayedJob, possibly governed by ActiveJob. While this would surely work, the problem with all these solutions is that they usually have a limited number of workers available on the server and we didn’t want to potentially... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Building a dynamic staging platform
    Background jobs are another limitation. Since only the Aha! Web service runs in a dynamic staging, the host environment's workers would process any Resque jobs that were sent to the shared Redis instance. If your branch hadn't updated any background-able methods, this would be no big deal. But if you were hoping to test changes to these methods, you would be out of luck. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • #30DaysofAppwrite : Appwrite’s building blocks
    The Schedules worker corresponds to the appwrite-schedule service in the docker-compose file. The Schedules worker uses a Resque Scheduler under the hood and handles the scheduling of CRON jobs across Appwrite. This includes CRON jobs from the Tasks API, Webhooks API, and the functions API. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • A quick look at background jobs in Ruby
    There are a few of popular systems. A few need a database, such as Delayed::Job, while others prefer Redis, such as Resque and Sidekiq. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Inngest and Resque, you can also consider the following products

Taskurai - Background Tasks, Jobs and Workflow for Azure and .NET

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

Spot.io - Build web, mobile and IoT applications using AWS Lambda and API Gateway, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions, and more.

Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

IronWorker - IronWorker is a task processor for applications that isolates the code and dependencies of individual tasks to be processed on demand.

delayed_job - Database based asynchronous priority queue system -- Extracted from Shopify - collectiveidea/delayed_job