Software Alternatives & Reviews

Inngest VS delayed_job

Compare Inngest VS delayed_job and see what are their differences

Inngest logo Inngest

Application and Data, Application Hosting, and Serverless / Task Processing

delayed_job logo delayed_job

Database based asynchronous priority queue system -- Extracted from Shopify - collectiveidea/delayed_job
  • Inngest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-05
  • delayed_job Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-02

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Inngest and delayed_job)
Application Hosting
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Serverless / Task Processing
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Inngest and delayed_job. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, delayed_job seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Inngest mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Inngest yet. Tracking of Inngest recommendations started around Apr 2023.

delayed_job mentions (4)

  • How to run a really long task from a Rails web request
    So how do we trigger such a long-running process from a Rails request? The first option that comes to mind is a background job run by some of the queuing back-ends such as Sidekiq, Resque or DelayedJob, possibly governed by ActiveJob. While this would surely work, the problem with all these solutions is that they usually have a limited number of workers available on the server and we didn’t want to potentially... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Delayed Job vs. Sidekiq: Which Is Better?
    Several gems support job queues and background processing in the Rails world — Delayed Job and Sidekiq being the two most popular ones. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Why does rails have a tradition of queuing background jobs in a separate NoSQL store, when both the queueing controller and the job class tend to hammer the main database anyway?
    Back in the day, before Sidekiq and such, we used Delayed Job https://github.com/collectiveidea/delayed_job. Source: over 2 years ago
  • A quick look at background jobs in Ruby
    There are a few of popular systems. A few need a database, such as Delayed::Job, while others prefer Redis, such as Resque and Sidekiq. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Inngest and delayed_job, you can also consider the following products

Taskurai - Background Tasks, Jobs and Workflow for Azure and .NET

Sidekiq - Sidekiq is a simple, efficient framework for background job processing in Ruby

Spot.io - Build web, mobile and IoT applications using AWS Lambda and API Gateway, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions, and more.

Hangfire - An easy way to perform background processing in .NET and .NET Core applications.

IronWorker - IronWorker is a task processor for applications that isolates the code and dependencies of individual tasks to be processed on demand.

Resque - Resque is a Redis-backed Ruby library for creating background jobs, placing them on multiple queues, and processing them later.