Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Indicative VS CMake

Compare Indicative VS CMake and see what are their differences

Umso
The Website Builder for Startups featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Indicative logo Indicative

Growth marketers, product managers, and data analysts use Indicative to optimize customer conversion, engagement, and retention.

CMake logo CMake

CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.
  • Indicative Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-14
  • CMake Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-09-21

We recommend LibHunt CMake for discovery and comparisons of trending CMake projects.

Indicative features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analytics
    Indicative offers a wide range of analytics and visualization tools that allow users to deeply understand and analyze customer behavior, making it easier to derive actionable insights.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Indicative provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, which can be beneficial for users who are not highly technical or familiar with advanced data analytics tools.
  • Real-Time Data Processing
    The platform supports real-time data processing, allowing businesses to make timely decisions based on the most up-to-date information.
  • Custom Event Tracking
    Allows businesses to track custom events and tailor the analytics to their specific needs, ensuring the data provided is relevant and actionable.
  • Seamless Integrations
    Indicative supports integration with various other tools and platforms, making it easier to consolidate data from different sources for a more comprehensive analysis.

Possible disadvantages of Indicative

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up custom events and integrations can be complex and time-consuming, especially for teams without dedicated technical resources.
  • Cost
    While Indicative offers a free tier, the more advanced features can be quite costly, which may not be ideal for smaller businesses or startups with limited budgets.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, the full functionality of the platform can take some time to master, requiring users to invest a significant amount of time to become proficient.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some other analytics platforms, Indicative may lack certain advanced features or customizations that larger, more data-driven enterprises might require.
  • Support Response Time
    Some users have reported slow response times from customer support, which can be frustrating when dealing with urgent technical issues or needing immediate assistance.

CMake features and specs

  • Cross-platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple operating systems including Windows, macOS, and Linux. This allows developers to write platform-independent CMake scripts.
  • Build tool agnostic
    CMake can generate build files for a variety of build systems including Makefiles, Ninja, and Visual Studio solutions. This means developers are not tied to a specific build tool.
  • Large community and extensive documentation
    CMake has a large user base and an extensive amount of documentation and tutorials available which can be helpful for new and experienced users alike.
  • Integrated testing support
    CMake includes support for testing frameworks such as CTest, which allows for automated testing of code during the build process.
  • Modular and scalable
    CMake is highly modular, enabling users to create reusable and maintainable code by organizing CMake scripts into libraries and modules.

Possible disadvantages of CMake

  • Steep learning curve
    CMake's complexity and its extensive range of features can be difficult for beginners to grasp, leading to a steep learning curve.
  • Verbose syntax
    CMake scripts can often become verbose and difficult to read, especially for large projects. This can make maintenance and debugging challenging.
  • Inconsistent module quality
    The quality and support of different CMake modules can vary, sometimes leading to issues with compatibility or functionality.
  • Performance overhead
    CMake may introduce some performance overhead during the configuration process, especially for very large projects.
  • Complexity in advanced features
    Some of the more advanced features of CMake, such as custom commands and complex dependency management, can be quite difficult to implement correctly.

Analysis of CMake

Overall verdict

  • CMake is generally considered a good tool for managing the build process of software projects, especially those with a complex codebase that spans multiple platforms.

Why this product is good

  • Flexibility
    It offers great flexibility in terms of defining build processes, enabling advanced configuration and optimization techniques to be used.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with many popular IDEs and other tools, providing a smoother development experience.
  • Wide adoption
    CMake is widely used in the industry, which leads to robust community support and regular updates.
  • Cross platform support
    CMake is designed to support multiple platforms, which makes it highly valuable for projects that need to be compiled and run on different operating systems.

Recommended for

  • projects requiring cross-platform compatibility
  • developers looking for a powerful build configuration tool
  • complex software projects with numerous dependencies
  • teams that value strong community and industry support

Indicative videos

+ Add

Review of Indicative Verb Forms Present Stem Part I

More videos:

  • Review - Verb Review Present Stem Indicative Mood Part II
  • Review - Review of the Indicative Mood

CMake videos

+ Add

CMake for Dummies

More videos:

  • Review - CppCon 2017: Mathieu Ropert “Using Modern CMake Patterns to Enforce a Good Modular Design”
  • Review - Hunter, a CMake driven package manager for C/C++ projects - Daniel Friedrich - Lightning Talks

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Indicative and CMake)

Indicative

CMake

Web Analytics
100 100%
Web Analytics
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
0 0%
Front End Package Manager
100% 100
Analytics
100 100%
Analytics
0% 0
JavaScript Package Manager
0 0%
JavaScript Package Manager
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Indicative and CMake. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CMake seems to be a lot more popular than Indicative. While we know about 54 links to CMake, we've tracked only 1 mention of Indicative. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Indicative mentions (1)

CMake mentions (54)

  • DeadLock: Research Results & Tech Stack
    All this C++ project can't be ran as simple C++ code, so I will be building this whole package using CMake. It will streamline building this project onto other computers. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
  • Master This Feature of DevEco Studio to Efficiently Implement ArkTS and C++ Glue Code
    For knowledge in this aspect, you can refer to the relevant documents of the CMake build tool: https://cmake.org/. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Creating a Native Desktop GUI Using C++ with GTK
    I used CMAKE to define the build configurations. I find it very convenient that CMAKE generates the Makefile on Linux and can also create a Visual Studio project on Windows. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Top 7 C++ Tools to explore in 2024 if it's not already the case.
    CMake stands for "Cross-platform Make" and is an open-source, platform-independent build system. It's designed to build, test, and package software projects written in C and C++, but it can also be used for other languages. Here's an overview of CMake and its features:. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • My first Software Release using GitHub Release
    When doing research for this lab exercise I looked at both vcpkg and conan. Both are package managers that would automate the installation and configuration of my program with its dependencies. However, when it came to releasing and sharing my program my options were limited. For example, the central public registry for conan packages is conan-center, but these packages are curated and the process is very... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Indicative and CMake, you can also consider the following products

Hotjar - The #1 Leader in Heatmaps, Recordings, Surveys & More. Sign up for a 15-day free trial and start learning from real user behavior today!

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Mixpanel - Mixpanel is the most advanced analytics platform in the world for mobile & web.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Crazy Egg - Through Crazy Egg's heat map and scroll map reports you can get an understanding of how your visitors engage with your website so you can boost your conversion rates.

SBT - SBT is a build tool for Scala, like Ant or Maven but with hieroglyphics.

Loading...