ImageKit.io VS WP Rocket

Having the server decide the image format based on the accept header is simpler. Services like https://imagekit.io/ (no affiliation) can do that for you. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago

Hosting wise, I would reccomend pythonanywhere.com, combined with either https://imagekit.io or https://cloudinary.com. Source: about 1 year ago

Use any third-party service to store images like Cloudinary , imagekit etc... And store image URLs in your database. If you have fewer images you keep image URLs directly in your APIs. Source: over 1 year ago

Imagekit.io – Image CDN with automatic optimization, real-time transformation, and storage that you can integrate with existing setup in minutes. Free plan includes up to 20GB bandwidth per month. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

We'll be using Multer to handle file uploads on our server and imagekit will do all our media heavy lifting. I chose these tools because I just found them easier to use and the latter has a very elaborate documentation (and a free tier too 😋). - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

I also like WP Rocket's database cleaning tool: https://wp-rocket.me/. Source: about 1 year ago

This will have a serious impact based on that kind of database. A good caching plug-in like WP Rocket should help with the overheads and speed things up. If you have server side caching like memcached or lighspeed make sure you are utilising it. Source: about 1 year ago

Purchase a license from the WP Rocket website (https://wp-rocket.me/). Source: about 1 year ago

Sounds like your colleague bought a nulled/"GPL free" copy of WP Rocket - probably not purchased from https://wp-rocket.me/. Source: about 1 year ago

One of the most beloved WordPress caching plugins is WP Rocket. They’ve managed to take something complex and make it extremely easy, yet still powerful and configurable. They have also made it easy to integrate with a CDN in just a few clicks. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago