Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Iceraven VS Otter Browser

Compare Iceraven VS Otter Browser and see what are their differences

Iceraven logo Iceraven

A web browser for Android, based on Mozilla's Fenix version of Firefox, GeckoView and Mozilla Android Components.

Otter Browser logo Otter Browser

Web browser controlled by the user, not vice-versa.
  • Iceraven Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-26
  • Otter Browser Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-30

Iceraven features and specs

  • Customizability
    Iceraven offers extensive customization options with a wide range of add-ons and extensions available, allowing users to tailor their browsing experience to their preferences.
  • Privacy-Focused
    Built on the Firefox codebase, Iceraven emphasizes user privacy, featuring built-in tracking protection and options to block scripts and cookies effectively.
  • Regular Updates
    The fork-maintainers actively maintain and update Iceraven, ensuring that it stays current with security patches and incorporating desirable features from other projects.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Iceraven allows users to inspect, modify, and contribute to the codebase, fostering a community-driven development model.

Possible disadvantages of Iceraven

  • Lacks Official Support
    As an unofficial fork of Firefox, Iceraven does not have the backing of Mozilla, meaning it lacks formal support and resources typically available to mainstream browsers.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Given that Iceraven incorporates experimental features and community contributions, there may be occasional stability issues or bugs not present in other browsers.
  • Compatibility Challenges
    While it supports a vast array of extensions, not all add-ons from the original platform may work seamlessly, potentially leading to compatibility issues for some users.
  • Limited User Base
    Being a niche browser, Iceraven has a smaller user base than mainstream browsers, which may result in a smaller community or fewer online resources for troubleshooting.

Otter Browser features and specs

  • Customization
    Otter Browser is highly customizable, allowing users to modify the interface and functionality to suit their preferences, making it a good choice for power users who want more control over their browsing experience.
  • Lightweight
    The browser is designed to be lightweight, which means it typically consumes fewer system resources compared to more mainstream browsers, leading to potentially faster performance on older or less powerful hardware.
  • Privacy-Focused
    Otter Browser emphasizes user privacy, providing features and settings that allow users to browse the web with greater anonymity and control over their data.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Otter Browser allows users and developers to inspect the code, contribute to its development, and trust that there are no hidden tracking or data collection methods.

Possible disadvantages of Otter Browser

  • Limited Extensions
    Unlike more popular browsers, Otter Browser doesn't have a vast library of extensions and plugins, which may limit functionality for users relying on specific browser extensions for their workflow.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Some websites may not be fully compatible with Otter Browser, which can lead to rendering issues or lack of functionality on certain web pages that are optimized for more mainstream browsers.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    Otter Browser may not receive updates and new features as frequently as larger browsers, potentially leading to delays in receiving security patches and new functionalities.
  • Smaller Community
    As a less widely used browser, Otter Browser has a smaller user community, which can make it more challenging to find support, troubleshooting advice, or user-generated content compared to more popular browsers.

Analysis of Otter Browser

Overall verdict

  • Otter Browser is a solid choice for users looking for a customizable and lightweight browser that balances classic features with modern web compatibility. It's particularly appealing to those who have fond memories of the classic Opera browser or who want more control over their browsing environment.

Why this product is good

  • Otter Browser is designed to recreate and enhance the best aspects of the classic Opera (12.x) browser, offering a unique and nostalgic browsing experience. It emphasizes user control and customizability, allowing users to tailor the browser to their specific needs. Additionally, it supports modern web standards while maintaining a lightweight footprint, which can be beneficial for users who want a fast and efficient browsing experience.

Recommended for

  • Users seeking extensive customization options
  • Fans of the classic Opera browser
  • Individuals looking for a lightweight, efficient browser
  • Privacy-conscious users wanting more control over their data
  • Tech-savvy users who enjoy tweaking and optimizing their browsing experience

Iceraven videos

最强手机浏览器iceraven下载 | GitHub找不到安装包下载入口怎么办?iceraven版本选择

Otter Browser videos

Пару слов про otter browser (форк opera 12)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Iceraven and Otter Browser)
Web Browsers
45 45%
55% 55
Web Development Tools
47 47%
53% 53
Security & Privacy
47 47%
53% 53
Web Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Iceraven and Otter Browser. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Iceraven and Otter Browser

Iceraven Reviews

We have no reviews of Iceraven yet.
Be the first one to post

Otter Browser Reviews

The 11 Best Web Browsers Not Based on Chromium
Otter Browser is a unique project that aims to bring back the best features of the classic Opera web browser while utilizing modern web technologies. If you're a fan of Opera's earlier versions, you'll appreciate Otter Browser's efforts to recreate the familiar experience with updated capabilities.
Source: stackdiary.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Iceraven should be more popular than Otter Browser. It has been mentiond 41 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Iceraven mentions (41)

  • Mozilla owns information "you input through Firefox"
    I use https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser. If you don't need that, I'd recommend IronFox because of its explicit security goals. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Best web browser for phone
    Thanks, is this it? Just want to make sure I'm getting the correct one and not forked. Https://github.com/fork-maintainers/iceraven-browser. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • MF DOOM's wife speaks out publicly for the first time regarding his sudden death
    Kiwi Browser and Ungoogled Chromium for Android support chrome extensions on mobile. Firefox supports some extensions. Firefox Nightly (warning, unstable) supports even more. Firefox forks like Iceraven, Fennec, and Mull also support extensions. All of these guys support uBlock Origin. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to pirate reddit?
    Maybe I should also mention Kiwi Browser (Chromium-based) and Iceraven (Firefox-based) specifically for mobile. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • YSK: Choosing 'Reject All' doesn't reject all cookies.
    Firefox supports extensions. Firefox Nightly (warning, unstable) supports even more. Firefox forks like Iceraven, Fennec, and Mull also support extensions. Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

Otter Browser mentions (20)

  • Chrome pushes forward with plans to limit ad blockers in the future
    It took me a bit of searching, but it's nice to know that there are desktop browsers that are not based on Chromium or Gecko, i.e. Webkit [1]. I would like to Otter Browser [2], next time I use my Windows machine. [1] https://www.reddit.com/r/browsers/comments/nkzrj0/comment/gzht47d/ [2] https://otter-browser.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • If webkit is open source why isn't there a good webkit based browser on windows
    There are WebKit browsers for Windows: Otter Browser and my Split Browser (alpha). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Opera consumed more than my RAM size ~3.4GB of 3.2GB!
    Ditch Opera for Otter Browser, which is a spiritual continuation of the classic Opera. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What do you think about a lightweight nightly WebKit browser for Windows with split view? I've just made a proof-of-concept in Qt.
    Proof of concept for split screen and based on qt is long available with the otter browser - you may be interested in the project https://otter-browser.org/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Is Opera GX using more memory than Edge?
    Opera GX is overloaded with features, which take more RAM. Use the regular Opera for more lightweight experience. Or Otter Browser for even less RAM. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Iceraven and Otter Browser, you can also consider the following products

Brave - Fast and secure, ad and tracker blocking browser.

Privacy Browser - Privacy Browser is an open source Android web browser focused on user privacy.

Min - Web Browser, Productivity, macOS, Desktop, and Browsers

Opera GX Gaming Browser - The world’s first gaming browser

Lightning Browser - One of the smallest, fastest Android web browsers around.

Maxthon Cloud Browser - Maxthon Cloud Browser is a powerful multi-functional browser.