Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

IBM Sterling File Gateway VS Cloudfogger

Compare IBM Sterling File Gateway VS Cloudfogger and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

IBM Sterling File Gateway logo IBM Sterling File Gateway

IBM Sterling File Gateway is an easy solution to transfer files with different file formats and protocols.

Cloudfogger logo Cloudfogger

Easy and secure encryption for the cloud. Provides security for all cloud storage services like Dropbox, OneDrive and Google Drive.
  • IBM Sterling File Gateway Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-28
Not present

IBM Sterling File Gateway features and specs

  • Scalability
    IBM Sterling File Gateway effectively handles high volumes of file transfers, making it suitable for large enterprises with significant data exchange needs.
  • Security
    The platform offers robust security features, including encryption and authentication, ensuring the safe transmission of sensitive data.
  • Comprehensive Protocol Support
    Supports a wide range of protocols, allowing for flexible integration with various systems and partners.
  • Automation and Workflow Management
    Enables users to automate file transfer processes through rich workflow capabilities, reducing manual intervention.
  • Enhanced Visibility and Monitoring
    Provides comprehensive tracking and reporting features, allowing users to monitor file transfer activities in real-time.

Possible disadvantages of IBM Sterling File Gateway

  • Complexity
    The platform can be complex to configure and manage, requiring skilled personnel for setup and maintenance.
  • Cost
    As an enterprise-grade solution, it may come with a higher price tag compared to smaller or more niche file transfer options.
  • Resource Intensive
    Might require significant IT resources for deployment and ongoing management, potentially impacting smaller organizations with limited IT staff.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its extensive features and capabilities, users may face a steep learning curve during the initial adoption phase.
  • Customization Limitations
    While highly capable, some users may find the predefined functionalities limiting in terms of customization for specific organizational needs.

Cloudfogger features and specs

  • File-Level Encryption
    Cloudfogger provides file-level encryption, ensuring that individual files are protected, regardless of where they are stored or how they are transferred.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    The service supports multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, iOS, and Android, making it versatile and accessible from a variety of devices.
  • Ease of Use
    Cloudfogger offers a user-friendly interface which simplifies the encryption process, even for users who may not be tech-savvy.
  • Compatibility with Popular Cloud Services
    The service integrates smoothly with many popular cloud storage providers such as Dropbox, Google Drive, and OneDrive, adding an extra layer of security to these services.
  • Free Basic Version
    Cloudfogger provides a free version with basic features, making encryption accessible to users who may not want to invest in a premium service.

Possible disadvantages of Cloudfogger

  • Discontinued Development
    As of my knowledge cutoff in 2021, Cloudfogger has discontinued active development and updates, which could pose security risks over time as new vulnerabilities remain unpatched.
  • No Support for Linux
    Cloudfogger does not offer a client for Linux operating systems, limiting its usability for users who rely on this OS.
  • Limited Features in Free Version
    The free version of Cloudfogger comes with limitations on advanced features, which might necessitate a premium account for full functionality.
  • Dependency on Cloudfogger’s Ecosystem
    Files that are encrypted using Cloudfogger can only be decrypted using its software, which could be a problem if the service were to shut down completely.
  • Performance Overhead
    Encrypting and decrypting files can introduce a performance overhead, potentially slowing down operations especially for large files or slower devices.

Analysis of Cloudfogger

Overall verdict

  • Cloudfogger was a reputable option for those needing file encryption for cloud storage. However, as of now, the service has been discontinued, and its software is no longer supported or available. Therefore, while Cloudfogger was a good option in its time, it is not suitable for use today given the lack of updates and support.

Why this product is good

  • Cloudfogger was a tool used to encrypt files for cloud storage services like Dropbox, Google Drive, and others. It was appreciated for its ease of use and ability to encrypt files locally before uploading, ensuring that only encrypted files were stored in the cloud. This approach provided an additional layer of security for users concerned about privacy and unauthorized access to their cloud-stored data.

Recommended for

    For those seeking active alternatives, it's recommended to look into other encryption services like Boxcryptor, Cryptomator, or services built into modern cloud storage options that provide similar encryption features. These alternatives offer up-to-date support and continued development, ensuring better security and compatibility with current systems.

IBM Sterling File Gateway videos

+ Add

IBM Sterling File Gateway

Cloudfogger videos

+ Add

TEST / REVIEW #006 - Mit Cloudfogger Dateien verschlüsseln

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to IBM Sterling File Gateway and Cloudfogger)

IBM Sterling File Gateway

Cloudfogger

File Sharing
35 35%
File Sharing
65% 65
Cloud Storage
32 32%
Cloud Storage
68% 68
Data Integration
100 100%
Data Integration
0% 0
Backup & Sync
0 0%
Backup & Sync
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using IBM Sterling File Gateway and Cloudfogger. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare IBM Sterling File Gateway and Cloudfogger

IBM Sterling File Gateway Reviews

We have no reviews of IBM Sterling File Gateway yet.
Be the first one to post

Cloudfogger Reviews

16 Tresorit Alternatives
Cloudfogger will bring the names of Dropbox, as well as Box.net or even in terms of the OneDrive, all along with the local storage. It will be creating a virtual drive on top of your system right through which you can process all your files on the automatic versions.
Source: www.topbestalternatives.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing IBM Sterling File Gateway and Cloudfogger, you can also consider the following products

AWS Transfer for SFTP - AWS Transfer for SFTP (AWS SFTP), is a fully managed service hosted in AWS that enables transfer of files over the Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol directly in and out of Amazon S3.

BoxCryptor - Boxcryptor encrypts your sensitive files before uploading them to cloud storage services like Dropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive, Box, and many others.

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct - IBM Sterling Connect:Direct is a leading provider of secure file transfer solutions that help organizations increase efficiency by reducing reliance on FTP for file transfers.

Mega - Secure File Storage and collaboration

MOVEit - Secure data & file transfer for enterprise-level users

Cryptomator - When it comes to saving your files on a cloud server, it is important to ensure the security of those files. Keeping your delicate files out of the wrong hands can save you a lot of time and hassle. Read more about Cryptomator.

Loading...