Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

IBM Cloud Object Storage VS Azure Stack

Compare IBM Cloud Object Storage VS Azure Stack and see what are their differences

IBM Cloud Object Storage logo IBM Cloud Object Storage

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a platform that offers cost-effective and scalable cloud storage for unstructured data.

Azure Stack logo Azure Stack

Microsoft Azure Stack is an extension of Azure that brings the innovation of cloud computing to build and deploy hybrid applications anywhere.
  • IBM Cloud Object Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18
  • Azure Stack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-12

IBM Cloud Object Storage features and specs

  • Scalability
    IBM Cloud Object Storage offers very high scalability, allowing businesses to store large amounts of data easily. This flexibility is crucial for businesses that are growing their storage needs or have fluctuating demands.
  • Data Resiliency
    The service provides robust data resiliency options, including geo-dispersed storage configurations, enabling enhanced protection against data loss and improved availability.
  • Cost Efficiency
    With its flexible pricing model, businesses can choose options that best fit their budget, such as 'Pay-as-you-go' plans, thereby optimizing costs according to actual usage.
  • Security Features
    It comes with comprehensive security features, including encryption, access control, and integration with IAM policies, ensuring that data is protected both at rest and in transit.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with the broader IBM Cloud ecosystem, as well as other cloud services and applications, allows businesses to easily incorporate this storage solution into their existing cloud strategy.

Possible disadvantages of IBM Cloud Object Storage

  • Complexity
    The extensive feature set and customization options might lead to a steeper learning curve for new users or smaller teams without dedicated IT resources.
  • Performance Variability
    Depending on the region and specific use case, users might encounter variability in performance, particularly in scenarios requiring low-latency or high-throughput data access.
  • Support Availability
    While IBM offers various support plans, certain users might find the support mechanisms, such as community forums and basic plans, less responsive compared to some other providers.
  • Pricing Complexity
    Although pricing models are flexible, they can also become complex and convoluted, making it difficult for some businesses to predict costs precisely without detailed monitoring and analysis.
  • Limited Proprietary Tooling
    Compared to some competitors, IBM might have fewer proprietary tools and native applications directly integrated with their cloud storage, potentially requiring additional third-party tools or custom development for specific needs.

Azure Stack features and specs

  • Hybrid Cloud Capabilities
    Azure Stack allows for a seamless hybrid cloud experience, enabling organizations to use Azure services both on-premises and in the cloud, which promotes flexibility and scalability in IT infrastructure.
  • Consistent Development Environment
    Developers can use the same tools, APIs, and processes used in the Azure public cloud, providing a consistent and efficient development experience across environments.
  • Data Sovereignty
    Organizations can keep sensitive data on-premises, complying with regional data sovereignty laws and regulations while still leveraging Azure services.
  • Edge Computing
    Azure Stack can process and analyze data locally, close to the source, which is beneficial for scenarios that require low latency, such as IoT and real-time analytics.
  • Customizable Hardware
    Azure Stack can be deployed on hardware options from several OEM partners, offering flexibility in terms of hardware choices to meet specific organizational needs.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Stack

  • Initial Cost
    Implementing Azure Stack can be expensive due to the need for specific hardware, licensing fees, and the potential complexity of integration with existing systems.
  • Management Complexity
    Managing an Azure Stack environment can be complex, requiring skilled personnel and additional resources to maintain and support the hybrid cloud infrastructure.
  • Limited Service Availability
    Not all Azure services available in the public cloud are supported on Azure Stack, which may restrict certain functionalities and require careful planning and architecture design.
  • Updates and Maintenance
    Azure Stack requires regular updates and maintenance to keep it aligned with the Azure cloud and to ensure security, which can add to operational overhead.
  • Scalability Constraints
    Although Azure Stack offers scalability, it is still bound by on-premises infrastructure limits, which may constrain growth compared to the scalability offered by the full Azure public cloud.

IBM Cloud Object Storage videos

IBM Cloud Object Storage: Built for business

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with IBM Cloud Object Storage
  • Review - IBM Cloud Object Storage webinar

Azure Stack videos

Azure Stack - An extension of Azure | Azure Friday

More videos:

  • Review - Azure Stack HCI 20H2 with Cosmos Darwin
  • Review - Dell EMC Solutions for Microsoft Azure Stack HCI Deep Dive

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to IBM Cloud Object Storage and Azure Stack)
Cloud Computing
85 85%
15% 15
Cloud Storage
86 86%
14% 14
Object Storage
87 87%
13% 13
Storage
93 93%
7% 7

User comments

Share your experience with using IBM Cloud Object Storage and Azure Stack. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Stack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

IBM Cloud Object Storage mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM Cloud Object Storage yet. Tracking of IBM Cloud Object Storage recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Azure Stack mentions (3)

  • Oxide: The Cloud Computer
    Oracle, AWS & Azure all have "Cloud at Customer" offerings. And these offerings have existed for years. https://www.oracle.com/cloud/cloud-at-customer/ https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/azure-stack https://aws.amazon.com/outposts/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Some old propaganda from the Windows 7 Retail Release.
    Azure runs a specialised version of Windows server called Azure Stack. You can get info on the versions Microsoft released to the public here https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/overview/azure-stack/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Did they just invent on-prem hosting?
    Azure Stack - https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/overview/azure-stack/. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing IBM Cloud Object Storage and Azure Stack, you can also consider the following products

Alibaba Object Storage Service - Alibaba Object Storage Service is an encrypted and secure cloud storage service which stores, processes and accesses massive amounts of data

Azure Storage Explorer - Easily manage your Azure storage accounts in the cloud, from Windows, macOS, or Linux, using Azure Storage Explorer.

Contabo Object Storage - S3-compatible cloud object storage with unlimited, free transfer at a fraction of what others charge. Easy migration & predictable billing. Sign up now & save.

AWS Storage Gateway - AWS Storage Gateway is a service connecting an on-premises software appliance with cloud-based storage.

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage - Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

VMware vSAN - VMware vSAN is radically simple, enterprise-class software-defined storage powering VMware hyper-converged infrastructure.