Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

IBM Cloud Object Storage VS Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Compare IBM Cloud Object Storage VS Azure Database for PostgreSQL and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

IBM Cloud Object Storage logo IBM Cloud Object Storage

IBM Cloud Object Storage is a platform that offers cost-effective and scalable cloud storage for unstructured data.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL logo Azure Database for PostgreSQL

Try Azure Database for PostgreSQL to build reliable and intelligent applications for your organization.
  • IBM Cloud Object Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-18
  • Azure Database for PostgreSQL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-05

IBM Cloud Object Storage features and specs

  • Scalability
    IBM Cloud Object Storage offers very high scalability, allowing businesses to store large amounts of data easily. This flexibility is crucial for businesses that are growing their storage needs or have fluctuating demands.
  • Data Resiliency
    The service provides robust data resiliency options, including geo-dispersed storage configurations, enabling enhanced protection against data loss and improved availability.
  • Cost Efficiency
    With its flexible pricing model, businesses can choose options that best fit their budget, such as 'Pay-as-you-go' plans, thereby optimizing costs according to actual usage.
  • Security Features
    It comes with comprehensive security features, including encryption, access control, and integration with IAM policies, ensuring that data is protected both at rest and in transit.
  • Integration
    Seamless integration with the broader IBM Cloud ecosystem, as well as other cloud services and applications, allows businesses to easily incorporate this storage solution into their existing cloud strategy.

Possible disadvantages of IBM Cloud Object Storage

  • Complexity
    The extensive feature set and customization options might lead to a steeper learning curve for new users or smaller teams without dedicated IT resources.
  • Performance Variability
    Depending on the region and specific use case, users might encounter variability in performance, particularly in scenarios requiring low-latency or high-throughput data access.
  • Support Availability
    While IBM offers various support plans, certain users might find the support mechanisms, such as community forums and basic plans, less responsive compared to some other providers.
  • Pricing Complexity
    Although pricing models are flexible, they can also become complex and convoluted, making it difficult for some businesses to predict costs precisely without detailed monitoring and analysis.
  • Limited Proprietary Tooling
    Compared to some competitors, IBM might have fewer proprietary tools and native applications directly integrated with their cloud storage, potentially requiring additional third-party tools or custom development for specific needs.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL features and specs

  • Scalability
    Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers high scalability with the ability to easily scale up or down based on demand, which ensures that you can efficiently manage changes in workloads without downtime.
  • Managed Service
    As a fully managed database service, Azure handles database management tasks like patching, backups, and monitoring, allowing developers to focus more on application development rather than infrastructure maintenance.
  • High Availability
    The service provides built-in high availability within the same region, ensuring that your database has minimal downtime and can manage failovers effectively.
  • Security Features
    Azure Database for PostgreSQL offers advanced security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, virtual network service endpoints, and integration with Azure Active Directory for comprehensive security management.
  • Integration with Azure Ecosystem
    The service tightly integrates with other Azure services such as Azure Data Factory, Azure Analytics, and Power BI, enabling comprehensive data solutions and seamless workflows across different applications.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Database for PostgreSQL

  • Cost
    While offering a broad array of features, Azure Database for PostgreSQL can be more expensive compared to managing your own on-premises or cloud-hosted PostgreSQL database, especially as the need for more resources and higher performance grows.
  • Limited Control
    As a managed service, users have less control over the server configurations and underlying hardware, which may be a drawback for applications requiring specific customizations or optimizations.
  • Dependency on Azure Infrastructure
    Relying on Azure's infrastructure means your database availability is tied to Azure's performance and data center outages, which may impact access and operations if issues arise.
  • Learning Curve
    New users transitioning to Azure Database for PostgreSQL from other environments might face a learning curve due to Azure-specific tools and interfaces, requiring time and resources to fully leverage the platform.
  • Feature Parity
    There might be delays in the availability of the latest PostgreSQL features or extensions within Azure Database for PostgreSQL, as updates undergo additional validation and rollout through Azure's platform.

IBM Cloud Object Storage videos

IBM Cloud Object Storage: Built for business

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started with IBM Cloud Object Storage
  • Review - IBM Cloud Object Storage webinar

Azure Database for PostgreSQL videos

Introducing Azure Database for PostgreSQL and Azure Database for MySQL

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Azure #17 - Azure Database for PostgreSQL | Azure Tutorial
  • Review - New ways to get started with Azure Database for PostgreSQL | Azure Friday

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to IBM Cloud Object Storage and Azure Database for PostgreSQL)
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Storage
100 100%
0% 0
MySQL Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using IBM Cloud Object Storage and Azure Database for PostgreSQL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Database for PostgreSQL seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

IBM Cloud Object Storage mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of IBM Cloud Object Storage yet. Tracking of IBM Cloud Object Storage recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Azure Database for PostgreSQL mentions (9)

  • Everyone Uses Postgres… But Why?
    Cloud deployment: PostgreSQL can be deployed in the cloud with AWS RDS, Amazon Aurora, Azure Database for PostgreSQL, or Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Configuring a Connection Pool
    Azure database for PostgreSQL supports built-in PgBouncer. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Top 8 Managed Postgres Providers
    Microsoft Azure Database is a completely managed PostgreSQL database service made to manage important workloads with included high availability and ability to grow. - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • DBT with Azure SQL Database
    I started writing a much longer post, but it really boils down to one thing - just use Azure PostgreSQL. It's great value, well supported by DBT, and an actual DW option. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Sharing a web layer fails with error 00231, despite the database already being registered as an ArcGIS Server data store
    I have a PostgreSQL database instance running in the Azure Database for PostgreSQL service. I am able to successfully connect and create enterprise geodatabases within. I am also able to successfully register the data store, both via ArcGIS Pro and ArcGIS Server Manager. However, when attempting to share a table in the database as a web layer (right click > Sharing > Share as web layer), it will ultimately fail... Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing IBM Cloud Object Storage and Azure Database for PostgreSQL, you can also consider the following products

Alibaba Object Storage Service - Alibaba Object Storage Service is an encrypted and secure cloud storage service which stores, processes and accesses massive amounts of data

Amazon Athena - Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Wasabi Cloud Object Storage - Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

Navicat Premium - Navicat Premium allows user to connect MySQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, SQL Server, SQLite, Oracle & PostgreSQL databases within a single application, includes data modeling feature

Contabo Object Storage - S3-compatible cloud object storage with unlimited, free transfer at a fraction of what others charge. Easy migration & predictable billing. Sign up now & save.

Toad for Oracle - Toad is an industry-standard tool for application development.