i3 VS BoxyHQ
Compare i3 VS BoxyHQ and see what are their differences
Verify your customers in under 15 seconds anywhere in the world with a cutting-edge SaaS & API platform for Identity Verification and AML/KYC compliance.
featured
i3
dwm
awesome
bspwm
Xfce
Openbox
Sway
Xmonad
BoxyHQ
Auth0
Skyflow
Frontegg
Keycloak
WorkOS
CipherStash
Dataset Search
SaaS, Premium Self-Hosted, or FREE OSS Self-Hosted
Enterprise Single Sign On (SSO) SAML SSO enables a secure authentication via an organization’s Identity Provider (IdP), as opposed to users or IT admins managing thousands, of usernames and passwords. With our product SAML Jackson, enterprise users can access your product via one of their secure IdPs (like Okta, Microsoft Azure, AWS, etc), which manages access and security for the entire organization.
Directory Sync Organizations use directories from different providers to manage users and enforce their access to organization resources. By integrating our Directory Sync product into your solution you can activate and deactivate user accounts, create groups, and keep your app in sync with the user directory in real-time. Supports the SCIM 2.0 protocol.
Additionally, we offer Audit Logs to track critical events in your application and a Data Privacy Vault to safeguard sensitive data.
BoxyHQBoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ stands out for its comprehensive suite of security building blocks tailored specifically for developers. With features like SAML/OIDC Single Sign-On (SSO) and Directory Sync with SCIM 2.0, BoxyHQ simplifies identity management and access control for B2B SaaS companies. Its focus on providing a seamless and customizable solution empowers developers to enhance security without compromising user experience. Additionally, BoxyHQ offers Audit Logs to track critical events within the product and a Privacy Vault, an API to protect sensitive data.
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ stands out for several reasons:
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ's primary audience encompasses:
BoxyHQ's answer:
The inception of BoxyHQ is deeply linked with Deepak's journey as the former CTO of a cybersecurity scaleup. In his role, Deepak wrestled with the challenge of allocating resources to enterprise compliance features that diverged from their core value proposition. Alongside Sama, they witnessed the escalating tide of cyber crimes, compounded by the concerning statistic that around 70% of development teams often bypass essential security measures due to time constraints. Motivated by this shared purpose of bringing security earlier in the developer live cycle, they embarked on a mission to address these challenges head-on. BoxyHQ emerged as a solution designed to automate product security and provide low-code APIs for seamless integration, empowering developers to implement enterprise-compliant security measures effortlessly. Through BoxyHQ, Deepak and the team strive to alleviate the burden on development teams while fortifying organizations against the escalating threats posed by cyber crimes.
BoxyHQ's answer:
We value the confidentiality of our large enterprise clients due to NDA agreements. However, some of our notable customers include Cal.com, Dub, Supademo, Spike, among many others.
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ uses the following technologies: - Next.js - PostgreSQL - Docker - Kubernetes
Based on our record, i3 seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 89 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
This is partially why I use tools like i3 (/ sway). I like the tool; it works extremely well for me; the design has stayed the same for 20 years; there's no profit motive to come along and fuck everything up. It just works. It is boring in the best way possible. Source: 5 months ago
I use MacBook Pro (Retina, 15-inch, Mid-2014) with Manjaro as OS using i3 as a window manager. It isn't perfect, but I'm thrilled with it. I have been a Mac OS user for the last 15 years and wouldn't change what I have now for a Mac OS because I don't need more than what I'm using for development. Source: 10 months ago
For daily usage I really like kubuntu with i3wm, but it takes some configuration and getting used to the shortcuts, but it's well worth it. Source: 12 months ago
Some window managers are meant to be used as-is, and provide a minimalist yet functional environment that use very little resources or give power users an almost HUD-like interface. Examples of those window managers are OpenBox and i3wm for X, and Weston and Hyprland for Wayland. Source: 12 months ago
I did use i3 exclusively for a few years. The reasons I chose it were. Source: 12 months ago
dwm - dwm is a dynamic window manager for X. It manages windows in tiled, monocle and floating layouts. All of the layouts can be applied dynamically, optimising the environment for the application in use and the task performed.
Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.
awesome - A dynamic window manager for the X Window System developed in the C and Lua programming languages.
Skyflow - Skyflow’s data privacy vaults deliver security, compliance and governance via a simple API
bspwm - A tiling window manager based on binary space partitioning
Frontegg - Elegant user management, tailor-made for B2B SaaS