Hy VS Agda

Hy: https://docs.hylang.org/en/stable/ I tend to stick to vanilla python though, mainly because Hy is too much of an hassle for my use cases. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Q: is there any game dev happening in Lisp? A: https://kandria.com/ and https://itch.io/jam/lisp-game-jam-2022 Q: how do I write a website with Lisp? A: https://lispcookbook.github.io/cl-cookbook/web.html#easy-routes-hunchentoot and https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Web-Examples.html Q: do I have to use emacs for developing Lisp? A: No, https://github.com/vlime/vlime and... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

I really like Hy because it's fully inter-operable with Python. But its documentation is insufficient for anything moderately complex, and its tooling support is pretty basic. If Hy were well documented and supported I'd use it for all my throwaway scripts and prototyping -- today I use Python for that. Source: over 1 year ago

You're looking for https://docs.hylang.org/en/stable. Source: over 1 year ago

I've been using the Hy REPL[0] whenever I've wanted to drop into a python REPL. The lack of whitespace formatting with Hy is great, but it still has access to all of python's libraries. [0] - https://docs.hylang.org/en/stable/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Still, there are many useful tools based on these ideas, used by programmers and mathematicians alike. What you describe sounds rather like Datalog (e.g. Soufflé Datalog), where you supply some rules and an initial fact, and the system repeatedly expands out the set of facts until nothing new can be derived. (This has to be finite, if you want to get anywhere.) In Prolog (e.g. SWI Prolog) you also supply a set of... Source: 10 months ago

Haskell and Agda are probably the most obvious examples. Ocaml too, but it is much older, so its type system is not as categorical. There is also Idris, which is not as well-known but is very cool. Source: 10 months ago

Coq, Agda, Lean, Isabelle, and probably some others which are not coming to my mind at the moment, but those would be considered the major ones. Source: over 1 year ago

Safer doesn't mean better. You could proof program correctness, and get proven program with tools like Coq (https://news.ycombinator.com/) and Agda (https://wiki.portal.chalmers.se/agda/pmwiki.php). However, it leads to much higher cost of creating software than both C++ and Rust. It's a trade-off. A great thing about Rust is that the safety costs very little compared to Coq and Agda. Source: over 1 year ago

At the most extreme level, you disappear into a meditative solitary retreat for a couple of years to seek enlightenment, and when you emerge you're no longer a programmer who writes programs, you're a theorist who proves theorems in Agda, and you have transcended above things that are tainted by the inherent evil of the material plane like "side effects" and "business needs" and "delivery timelines" and "could you... Source: almost 2 years ago