Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Hurl.it VS MockServer

Compare Hurl.it VS MockServer and see what are their differences

Hurl.it logo Hurl.it

Hurl makes HTTP requests.

MockServer logo MockServer

Easy mocking of any system you integrate with via HTTP or HTTPS.
  • Hurl.it Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-05
  • MockServer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-13

Hurl.it features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

MockServer features and specs

  • Flexibility
    MockServer provides extensive support for HTTP and HTTPS as well as customizable responses, which allows developers to simulate various scenarios and behaviors in a flexible manner.
  • Scriptable Expectations
    You can define expectations using Java, JavaScript, JSON, and YAML, enabling you to control responses in a programmatic way for more complex testing scenarios.
  • Ease of Integration
    MockServer can be easily integrated with various build tools and CI/CD pipelines, which streamlines the testing process and makes it more efficient.
  • Extensive Documentation
    MockServer comes with comprehensive documentation that includes usage examples, configuration guides, and API references, which helps in decreasing the learning curve.
  • Support for Unit and Integration Testing
    The tool supports both unit and integration testing, making it versatile for testing different levels of a system in isolation.

Possible disadvantages of MockServer

  • Performance Overhead
    Running MockServer can introduce performance overhead, especially in resource-constrained environments, which may affect the speed of the tests.
  • Complex Configuration
    While powerful, the configuration can become complex, particularly for more elaborate mock scenarios, leading to a steeper learning curve for newcomers.
  • Dependency Management
    When used in a Java environment, managing dependencies can become cumbersome, particularly if there are version conflicts with other libraries in the project.
  • Requires Java Runtime
    MockServer requires a Java Runtime Environment, which can be a limitation if your development environment or CI/CD pipeline does not support Java.
  • Limited Community Support
    While it has good official documentation, the community support around MockServer is not as extensive as some other tools, which may limit the availability of third-party plugins and extensions.

Analysis of MockServer

Overall verdict

  • MockServer is generally well-regarded and recommended for its robust features and ease of use. It is particularly praised for being useful in testing scenarios and for providing reliable mock responses without requiring a running instance of the actual service.

Why this product is good

  • MockServer is considered good by many developers due to its flexibility and functionality in simulating APIs and microservices. It allows for detailed control over request/response manipulation, making it ideal for testing and development environments. Its support for both HTTP and HTTPS, as well as its ability to mock complex interactions, make it a versatile tool in a developer's toolkit.

Recommended for

  • Developers who need to simulate or test API interactions.
  • Teams working on microservices architecture requiring isolated testing environments.
  • QA engineers looking for reliable test doubles in automated test suites.
  • Projects that require testing under conditions where the actual services are unavailable or costly to use.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Hurl.it and MockServer)
Developer Tools
17 17%
83% 83
API Tools
17 17%
83% 83
APIs
17 17%
83% 83
Command Line Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Hurl.it and MockServer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

MockServer might be a bit more popular than Hurl.it. We know about 4 links to it since March 2021 and only 3 links to Hurl.it. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Hurl.it mentions (3)

MockServer mentions (4)

  • MockServer: Easy mocking of any system you integrate (HTTP or HTTPS)
    There are several strategies to solve this kind of challenge, but today we will see MockServer as a tool to resolve it. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Please recommend a good API Mocking tool
    The open-source examples are mockoon, mock-server.com, etc. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Testing with MockServer
    I've just found out MockServer and it looks awesome 🤩 so I wanted to check it out repeating the steps of my previous demo WireMock Testing which (as you can expect) uses WireMock, another fantastic tool to mock APIs. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
  • How to unit test successful Oauth requests of 3rd party API's?
    I tend to use MockServer. With MockServer you can define inputs, so you can say that the request should look like this with that URL, etc etc. That way you can verify that the request looks okay. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Hurl.it and MockServer, you can also consider the following products

Beeceptor - Unblock yourself from API dependencies, and build & integrate with APIs fast. Beeceptor helps you build a mock Rest API in a few seconds.

Webhook.site - Instantly generate a free, unique URL and email address to test, inspect, and automate (with a visual workflow editor and scripts) incoming HTTP requests and emails.

Hurl.dev - Hurl is a command line tool that runs HTTP requests defined in a simple plain text format.

RESTClient - RESTClient can be used to test variety of HTTP communications and RESTful webservices.

Request inspector - Debug web hooks, http clients

Cocoa Rest Client - A free open source, native Apple OS X app for testing HTTP/REST endpoints