Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Humaaans VS Three.js

Compare Humaaans VS Three.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Humaaans logo Humaaans

Mix-&-match illustrations of humans with a design library.

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.
  • Humaaans Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-31
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

Humaaans features and specs

  • Customizability
    Humaaans allows users to mix and match various elements such as clothing, hairstyles, and poses, providing high flexibility in creating unique human illustrations.
  • User-Friendly
    The platform is very easy to use and doesn't require any design skills, enabling both designers and non-designers to create illustrations quickly.
  • High-Quality Designs
    The illustrations are professionally designed and aesthetically pleasing, making them suitable for a variety of uses such as websites, apps, and marketing materials.
  • Free to Use
    Humaaans offers its resources for free, which is a major advantage for individuals and companies looking to save on design expenses.
  • Versatility
    The illustrations can be adapted for numerous contexts and purposes, providing great versatility to the users.
  • Community and Examples
    The website offers a gallery of examples and a community that shares their creations, which can serve as inspiration and guidance for new users.

Possible disadvantages of Humaaans

  • Limited Styles
    Despite its customizability, Humaaans has a specific illustrative style that may not fit all design needs or brand guidelines.
  • Basic Customization
    While you can mix and match elements, the customization options are somewhat basic and might not meet the needs for highly specialized or detailed illustrations.
  • No Customer Support
    Humaaans does not offer dedicated customer support, which could be a drawback if users encounter issues or have questions.
  • Requires Vector Editing Software
    To make full use of the illustrations, users need to have access to vector editing software like Adobe Illustrator, which might not be available to everyone.
  • Static Illustrations
    The illustrations are static and lack animation or interactivity, which might be a limitation for more dynamic digital projects.

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Humaaans videos

Humaaans—Mix-&-match illustrations of people with a design library

More videos:

  • Review - My Thoughts on Humaaans Maker Rank And Bites!
  • Review - Create Human Images with Humaaans

Three.js videos

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Humaaans and Three.js)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Illustrations
100 100%
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Humaaans and Three.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Humaaans and Three.js

Humaaans Reviews

We have no reviews of Humaaans yet.
Be the first one to post

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be a lot more popular than Humaaans. While we know about 247 links to Three.js, we've tracked only 1 mention of Humaaans. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Humaaans mentions (1)

Three.js mentions (247)

  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Optimizing Three.js: 4 Key Techniques
    But code can also create something visually stunning, something everyone can appreciate. This is where tools like Three.js shine. However, Three.js can be heavy, especially when used in a dynamic web page accessed by devices with varying computational power. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Humaaans and Three.js, you can also consider the following products

Open Peeps - A hand-drawn illustration library.

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

Control Illustrations - 108 free flat illustrations with customizable characters

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

DrawKit - MIT licensed SVG illustrations, in 2 styles

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices